Well, good on yer all, is what I say. Glad you're happy. Don't like the implication, though, from some that circ is 'cleaner' and therefore uncirc must be less clean and even unpleasant. Ever heard of the shower and soap and water? I'm very glad I'm not circ'd, for these reasons:
> If we were meant to have no foreskin would we not have developed that way? Do we mutilate any other part of our body to 'improve' it?
> I like the variety - both of look and action. My foreskin retracts fully on erection - so I can have a 'circumcised' look automatically, but the presence of that extra covering gives a much better (and varied) wanking routine; and the glans has to be more sensitive.
> OK, you may say this is cheating a bit, but the foreskin can give that impression of extra fullness and length when flaccid - which can't be bad! After all, nothing has been added, but the circumcised have certainly had something taken away.
> If we were meant to have no foreskin would we not have developed that way? Do we mutilate any other part of our body to 'improve' it?
> I like the variety - both of look and action. My foreskin retracts fully on erection - so I can have a 'circumcised' look automatically, but the presence of that extra covering gives a much better (and varied) wanking routine; and the glans has to be more sensitive.
> OK, you may say this is cheating a bit, but the foreskin can give that impression of extra fullness and length when flaccid - which can't be bad! After all, nothing has been added, but the circumcised have certainly had something taken away.