Clever. :biggrin:
Ac - sign me up for the survey team. I'd happily door to door with that questionnaire. :smile:
Consider yourself added...
I think it should be a points based system:
1-20 - Shows no signs of skirt based erectile influence, possibly gay. Can be safely allowed to remain in society and injected with a safety compliance chip reading "This animal is safe to touch"
20-40 - Shows signs that skirts can influence erectile state, no aggression or need for power exhibited. Can be safely allowed to remain in society and injected with a safety compliance chip reading "This animal poses only mild risk of causing harm, use judgement"
40-60 - Shows of skirt based influence to erectile state and a moderate need for power exhibited. Can be allowed to remain in society, be injected with a safety compliance chip reading "This animal can cause harm, use caution" and added to the dangerous wild men list.
60-80 - Shows an above average skirt based erectile influence and need for power. Should be moved to special supervised housing, clearly marked with "Dangerous wild men" signs, injected with a safety compliance chip that reads "Dangerous - Do not touch" and tagged so that they can be tracked.
80-100 - Shows extreme signs of skirt based erectile influence, an uncontrollable need for power, and/or shows sympathy and understanding for those who've fallen foul of the project indicating that they may have falsified the answers provided. Should be immediately removed from society and placed in high security prisons for the potentially harmful.