musclebutt2
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2007
- Posts
- 450
- Media
- 7
- Likes
- 110
- Points
- 163
- Location
- San Francisco
- Sexuality
- 80% Gay, 20% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Contrary to what you might think about Lincoln, the Civil War was to keep the Union intact; ending slavery was a secondary benefit.
I second Madame Z's vitriol. The reason the US doesn't want to help Mexico and Latin America develop industrially/economically is simple, we don't want competition. Ever since the Spanish American war there has been a long history of American intervention in the region to make the governements politically unstable and screw with their economies to make them dependent on US markets. Also, the more these governments take out loans, especially from the "World Bank" it brings them further into debt and vunerable to US gov't pressure (AKA US corporate pressure). For example, many Carribbean economies became monocroppers and only raised bananas and pineapples for the benefit of the American Dole fruit corporation; it eventually destroyed their economy and land, etc. etc. etc....
I second Madame Z's vitriol. The reason the US doesn't want to help Mexico and Latin America develop industrially/economically is simple, we don't want competition. Ever since the Spanish American war there has been a long history of American intervention in the region to make the governements politically unstable and screw with their economies to make them dependent on US markets. Also, the more these governments take out loans, especially from the "World Bank" it brings them further into debt and vunerable to US gov't pressure (AKA US corporate pressure). For example, many Carribbean economies became monocroppers and only raised bananas and pineapples for the benefit of the American Dole fruit corporation; it eventually destroyed their economy and land, etc. etc. etc....