Will you please stop.
stop being a victim. It was a valid question by the op.
this is a porn site not a platform for nonsense micro triggers and starting arguments.
im asexual and understand the question fully
Hmm. Maybe I missed something. The thread shows two individuals answered OP's question. It also shows OP did not like the response of the second, which he could have glossed over. Instead, he chose to question the second individual about what he could and could not say in the response to the individual informing him the question was not okay to ask, not to not ask the question; this is what initially poisoned the thread as OP claims another potentially did as it quickly created animosity where there was none. Did I... miss something?
Everything OP said in his response to the second individual - and some other statements like there being little research into asexuality, could have been laid out in the op to avoid miscommunication, especially on a topic where there is already a lot of misinformation and assumptions, some of the latter which he displayed. Statements like "asexuals can have fulfilling lives, but could certainly be missing out on something important" and 'since the very definition of libido is a "person's sexual desire" (libido), by definition, asexuals have low libido," are problematic.
In the former statement, it is the faulty implications. Important? What is? Sex? Of which many asexuals actually have had and do. (His statement is no less applicable to anybody). Just because a significant enough majority of other people find it important? Just because he thinks it possibly the greatest pleasure in life - which, in my opinion, are representative of mindset due heavily to his gender identity, sexual orientation, and socialization? That is not to say individuals of other genders, sexual orientation, etc., do not find it important, or that every person in his demographics will; rather, that it does not go without notice the trend, be it a stereotype those of his demographics simply buy into or something of actual great importance to them, that it is potentially the most important thing to them, and often stringently based around physicality and assumed characteristics thereof.
In the latter, the very definition from Wikipedia he uses, which at least one has noted as problematic, does not cast ALL asexuals as having low or no libido, though he erroneously presumes so using faulty logic. In fact, to repeat, he stated, "according to Wikipedia, 'Asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to others, or low or absent interest in or desire for sexual activity. It may be considered a sexual orientation or the lack thereof...' The word "OR" is extremely important here. That means, for instance, an asexual, as at least one individual has pointed out, can lack sexual attraction to other people, but in fact have a normal or higher libido, whatever "normal" even means here.
Nonetheless, to answer OP's question, no, I have not. Being a demisexual, which may throw him for a loop given some of the assumptions he has displayed and tried to argue as factual (despite others responses he has mostly disregarded except the portions he did not like and thereafter responded to), it is rare for me to be sexually attracted to a person, as in want to have sex with him, without an emotional bond. An even then, it is furthermore unlikely for me to actually engage in sex even on the rare occasion. In fact, any time I have engaged in sex without having/or having a damaged emotional bond, sex has been less than pleasurable. I can count on one hand the number of times I orgasmed in roughly a hundred sexual encounters involving roughly thirty (different) people to include boyfriends and a husband, which required a lot of mental gymnastics. That does not mean I am not sexually aroused by porn, erotica, or even sexual touching, but rather that my what the OP may consider "low" libido is due to the fact I do not seek sex to be validated based purely/mostly on my physicality and assumed characteristics, but rather who I am as a person, which is not reduced to my physicality or anybody else's. (If he does not like that response, he can just gloss over this too.)