you missed my point. my point was that anatomically a petite woman's genitals don't seem to be scaled downward all that much or even at all-- so that if very small women can have a very large babies, there's probably isn't that much of a difference with penis size either.
but i know a lot of guys get off on the idea their big cock busting open a tiny woman or whatever. there's enough of it in porn to know that big cock plus small woman is a turn on a for a good number of guys. there's no problem with that at all-- just that it seems to be more fantasy than reality.
It appears you aren't stating it absolutely can't be, but believe it doesn't nevertheless. I, on the other hand, believe there is some overall correlation between height and vagina size. I'm not trying to state small chicks can't have big vaginas, but that they will 'tend' to not have as big of vaginas as taller or bigger hip women. I believe this based on my study of height vs penis size, in which there is a moderate correlation. So it stands to reason, to me, that if it applies to guys it probably will apply to gals also.
I assume you are one who tends to not believe correlations exist in this type subject matter invloving penises and vaginas? For instance, you probably think there probably isn't a correlation between height and penis size, correct? For if you did I don't think you would have worded this post as you did. Usually when someone dismisses height as correlated with penis size, I've noticed they tend to dismiss all other suggested correlations pertaining/related to this type topic. And those who tend to accept a correlation tend to too easily accept other correlations. Unlike so many others, I actually research this stuff (and recieve no credit for it I might add) with every available resource I can find that can be deemed probably credible.
Correlations don't exist in some suggested connections, but despite popular opinion, in other suggested connections they do. Also, correlations that do exist vary from mild to moderate to strong. In other words, the height to penis correlation is moderate, but the penis length to penis girth correlation is strong (the length and girth size relation sort of surprised me), and the shoe size correlaton is mild (except in the penis size outliers in which it jumps up to moderate). The hand hasn't been found to correlate with penis size (but the index finger has). There are many others I could bring up, such as the growers vs showers belief in which popular opinion is wrong, and I could post doctor studies, my own database studies, etc, on very many of these debated areas, but I'm not about to do all that again.
There isn't any study on female size vs vagina size that I know of. So I have to make what seems like a reasonable assumption based on other info I have. Just like there isn't any good study on black guys penis size, yet based on my studying flaccid vs erect databases, and doctor studies of flaccid vs erect, and my study of white chicks vs black chicks in how deep mandingo can go in them, there is strong implication black guys are bigger than white guys. If the implication was different I would say so. I'm for the truth, no matter what my predisposed inclination to believe is.
I'll stop here, but my point is that I doubt your belief of lack of correlations is really any more than your predisposed thinking that way. And I'm not speaking of just you. Everyone seems to have their predisposed ways of thinking on such matters, including me. The difference between me and the masses is that I try to objectively study in detail in ways that hardly anyone else does. Your post that there are small gals who can have big babies is not sufficient to determine that an overall correlation probably doesn't exist.
I'm not quite sure why I even posted, but anyway there it is.
