After reading the other thread in the Relationships, Jealousy and Discrimination forum titled 'newly divorced man' it got me thinking about the title of this thread.
When do you think it's relevant to use a personal experience as potential 'evidence' or to back up an argument/position?
You see, I keep hearing that my fellow n-words get unfairly treated by the police, can't walk around town without being controlled, get severely beaten up when they spend the night in custody, etc.
I'm now 22 and I've never ever been controlled by the police, despite having been in situations where that could have been legitimate.
Does that mean what they say is false? Certainly not!
Anecdotal evidences or testimonies, let's admit they are honest and not exaggerated, are proofs that some things can happen under certain circumstances, but they don't give any information about the frequency at which these events happen.
Very few things in life are absolute, moreso when they concern human interactions. That's why adding your personal experience to your argument can only give it more weight but cannot be used as an evidence. It may help draw a pattern but not create an absolute rule.
Hell, even scientific theories, that are the only things that I would consider absolute, get challenged everyday and get replaced by more relevant ones when they are proven wrong (or not entirely true).