Anita Hill or Clarence Thomas
- Thread starter B_quietguy
- Start date
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
Dave NoCal
Superior Member
bananaclubcock
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2010
- Posts
- 191
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 22
- Points
- 53
- Location
- Eastern U.S.
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Anita Hill for sure. One thing seldom discussed was that Hill was a protégé of Robert Bork, a very right-wing justice. She had almost nothing to gain by speaking out and much to lose.
And today we have Clarence Thomas's Tea Party whack job wife ask for an apology. Fuck off.
Yeah, that was really offensive of Virginia Thomas! Asking for an apology is like some rapist wanting an apology from his victim because she turned him into the police and ruined his life. Just goes to show she is clueless!
slurper_la
Superior Member
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
wilder
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts
- 39
- Media
- 11
- Likes
- 39
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 68
- Location
- Freestone, CA
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Anita Hill. Remember: she didn't volunteer the information. She was sought out and interviewed after he was offered up as a potential justice. I wish one of those politicians had stood up to him when he claimed the questioning was a "high tech lynching for uppity blacks". His questioning was no more intensive than others of our times. I only wish he WAS an "uppity black"! That would have been a real asset to this court, which is in the pocket of our corporate overlords. In what way does he consider himself "uppity"? Maybe Anita could call up Virginia and gently recommend that CT publicly apologize for lying under questioning and calling Anita a liar.
Hoss
Loved Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2010
- Posts
- 11,801
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 589
- Points
- 148
- Age
- 73
- Location
- Eastern town
- Sexuality
- 60% Gay, 40% Straight
- Gender
- Male
- Hoss,
I'd rather have her than Clarence, she's attractive, he's just scary!
Back to the subject and truth. There may be truth from both sides.
When somebody shows up at a confirmation hearing, having had years to complain about alleged improprieties I have doubts . She was used by Democrats, and obviously made a few deals from her story (like writing a book & speaking engagements). Could have been partially accurate, it could have been completely accurate. That doesn't mean I feel Clarence Thomas was a saint, I have doubts with him as well.
Since what was said to have happened had happened yrs. earlier and she'd never said anything, there will always be lingering doubts in the minds of some people.
SilverTrain
Legendary Member
You thought you were being cute. But,
Anita Hill
Virginia Thomas
What were you saying about which dudes would be wanting to touch what?
B_VinylBoy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Posts
- 10,363
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 70
- Points
- 123
- Location
- Boston, MA / New York, NY
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I guess tedbted chooses his girls based on their willingness to spit or swallow? :biggrin1:
SilverTrain
Legendary Member
For anyone who watched those hearings to not acknowledge that Anita Hill would rather have been ANYWHERE in the universe than in front of the US Congress talking about pubic hairs and office shenanigans on a continual worldwide television feed, is indicative of either complete insincerity or complete ignorance.
Hoss
Loved Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2010
- Posts
- 11,801
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 589
- Points
- 148
- Age
- 73
- Location
- Eastern town
- Sexuality
- 60% Gay, 40% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I believe Anita Hill because she gave very detailed descriptions of his behavior. Her testimony was clear and consistent despite being questioned by one senator after another for several days. She really held up well under all that scrutiny and pressure.
Clarence Thomas on the other hand denied everything without even acknowledging any specific allegations by Anita Hill. He even admitted he did not know what she said about him since he did not attend or watch any hearings where Anita Hill was present. (Apparently, his wife told him what Ms. Hill said in the hearings.)
His responses came across to me as complete denial.
Clarence Thomas on the other hand denied everything without even acknowledging any specific allegations by Anita Hill. He even admitted he did not know what she said about him since he did not attend or watch any hearings where Anita Hill was present. (Apparently, his wife told him what Ms. Hill said in the hearings.)
His responses came across to me as complete denial.
Similar threads
