B_VinylBoy
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Posts
- 10,363
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 68
- Points
- 123
- Location
- Boston, MA / New York, NY
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Maxkok, Vinal Boy,
Of course there is a difference.
The most important reason is
that Pres. Clinton was underoath
at the time. Sex is usuall a personal
issue, however, if it starts taking
part in the work place. That's another
story.
In one breath you make a statement suggesting that a person's sex life shouldn't be a public issue and that a person should be able to be untruthful about it. In the next, you ignore your own beliefs to suggest that what happened to Bill Clinton was justified. Wanna see a perfect example of the true hypocrisy? Look no further than your last two statements. Because the fact is... if your original rhetoric had any relevance, Bill Clinton wouldn't have ever been brought to trial for an affair with an intern to begin with. It would have been considered a personal issue and Republicans wouldn't have made this a concern. But we all know when it comes to bullshit party politics and a person's blinding partisan beliefs, everything is do what we say and not what we do.
As far as I know, Mehlman
never got caught having sex at the
office. (After all, it's my tax money
that pays for the upkeep of the oval
office---shouldn't I be entitled to have
sex in there too!)
Most Democrats won't give a damn about this. We've seen politicians "flip flop" on more minor things. He came out of the closet when he was vehemently against many issues surrounding gay rights. There will be some opportunity whores who will try to cash in, of course, because when it comes to scoring morality points with the feeble minded "family values crowd" these things are easy sells. But watch when some of his own kind throw him under the bus for this.
Last edited: