Another Evangelical Cocksucker

Gisella

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Posts
4,822
Media
0
Likes
114
Points
193
Location
USA
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
I do think that his style of expressing and see things goes with his mind set he learned..if he was raised in this environment of thinking, he had to fight his desires as a monster inside "repulsive and dark" and use drugs while in his 'monster' mode...for me is pure hypocrisy and arrogance you think you can control this strong force inside, repression in some type of personalities may even become out of control and because of 'need' of hiding it can start to act 'sicker'... to be caught...and other personalities looking for more grandiose power in their professions...even when their own lives is out of control...

I'm sick of people for one reason or another choosing this kind of path...I'm thinking about those people that choose jobs they are 'above' the radar to 'hide'..yeh right...and now I'm thinking about policemen that battered their own wives and are called to other men's home that are doing the same...as a 'law and order officer'...:rolleyes:

Than to me this situation has not much to do with sexual preference but dealings of power, control and maybe status in some peoples minds...
 

eljoaco

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2006
Posts
10
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
223
Location
Denver, CO
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
It amazes me how these religious fanatics interpret the bible to their convenience. There are a few lines that suggest that gay sex is wrong. The most typical is something about a man should not lay with another man the same way as with a woman (something like that). However, these fanatics forget other lines such as you should love each other the way I (Jesus) have loved you. Also, that person who is free of sin shall cast the first stone. On the more interesting side, in the bible, it was ok to have slaves and it was also ok to have sex with your wife's slave to have children. How would that look in our society? How come the evangelists so faithful to the bible do not preach those things as written in the bible? As human beings we need spirituality to explain those things that we cannot understand but when people like Haggard, deceive thousands of people using religion that is beyond the basic human needs. We need true separation of church and state; we should not allow fanatics influence our government using lies as the foundation.
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
It amazes me how these religious fanatics interpret the bible to their convenience. There are a few lines that suggest that gay sex is wrong. The most typical is something about a man should not lay with another man the same way as with a woman (something like that).

I interpret this line as very early sex education. Men don't have vaginas, therefore, men must lie with them in a different way than with a woman.

Seems pretty straightforward, if you'll pardon the expression.
 

scanjock8

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
448
Media
6
Likes
343
Points
283
Age
34
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
WHAT?? I'm simply mascara-black with envy! You've met her? -the high priestess of L'Oréal???

Make no mistake.. I'm totally enamored of the little doll. I think she's a freaking hoot.

lashes and all. she was preaching at the time but i never made it to one of her services (going to church is somehow easily forgotten in palm springs;-)







I happen to ADORE her too DV!

"God makes no mistakes" - Tammy Faye Bakker Messner speaking about homosexuals.

(plus there's some high kitsch quality to her that's simply irresistible to this homo)

high kitsch yet still so genuine--rare combination. it's why i love dolly parton too (i often put her on my "who would you invite to dinner" list--seated next to henry kissinger, who would undoubtedly adore her)
 

Nelly Gay

Experimental Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
662
Media
0
Likes
19
Points
163
Gender
Male
Here's another log for the cabin:

First*, there was virulently anti-gay congressman Ed Schrock (MP3). Then there was virulently anti-free-Internet congressman Mark Foley.

Today, the president of the National Association of Evangelicals, Ted Haggard, who was featured in this year's documentary Jesus Camp preaching against homosexuality and who has been an aggressive proponent of Colorado's hate amendment --- has stepped down following revelations that he had relations with a male prostitute who kept recorded messages that Haggard left on his answering machine.



*Okay, not "first" by a long-shot: There was Roy Cohn (1950's), Robert Bauman (1980), John Paulk (2000), Brent Parker (2003), James Guckert (2005), Jim West (2005), and many other lesser-known right-wingers.


Wasn't J.Edgar Hoover a cross-dresser who lived with his boyf. whilst ruining so many good lifes ?
I firmly believe arch-homophobes are latent homosexuals hence their obsession with buggery, unnatural sex, etc. etc.
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Shelby, it just really tickles me that you see Democratic conspiracies in all this. I'm certain that you just rolled your eyes and villified those conspiracy theorists who questioned the timing and sequence of events with Monica Lewinsky, her stained dress that was tucked away in a closet, the emails and recorded phone calls that failed and had to be re-created... but of course, none of that was a conspiracy, I'm sure.

joyboytoy and others, right as always. It wasn't the acts, it was the facts. Frequenting hookers was not Ted's sin, it was doing those things that he condemns in others. Uh, if you suck cocks on weekends, don't stand in the pulpit on Sunday and talk about how bad it is to suck cock. If you beat your wife, don't talk about how horrible wife-beaters are. If you pick your nose, don't make fun of nose-pickers.

By the way, I also agree that his "I bought drugs, but didn't use them" was probably even less believable than "I smoked pot, but didn't inhale."
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
111
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm mostly pissed that these idiots are gay----they are really giving gay people a bad name. I think we should demand equal time about all the child-molsting degenerate heterosexuals as well...an stupid evil shit is a stupid evil shit, and yet what seems to be being made the most of about these guys is that they are "Them eee-vile homersexshuuls". Sexuality has nothing to do with it--they were all just fucking perves.
 

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
111
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
So, where on the scale does that put Phred Felps?

If that evil son of a bitch turns out to be a homosexual, I will change to fucking women--100%---I will NOT have ANYTHING associated with that satanic fuckwad---if he or his bastard children followers ever show up at a funeral where any of my friends or family are being buried, I swear to God I will kill everyone of them dead where they stand. That man needs to he dragged naked by his testicles across 40 miles of acid infused broken glass....:mad:
 

joyboytoy79

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Posts
3,686
Media
32
Likes
60
Points
193
Location
Washington, D.C. (United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Not sure if this is a fact or not, BUT I read a post somewhere that he has a lesbian daughter. God help her! Not for being gay but for having him for a father.

I've not heard this one, but it wouldn't really surprise me. Having a lesbian daughter seems to be the hallmark of being a represser of gays. Let's take a few moments to note some of the more popular i-have-a-lesbian-daughter-but-hate-gays fanatics.

Sonny Bono
Dick Cheney
Bob Corker
Dick Gephardt
Newt Gingrich (well, it's his sister, but close enough)
Sadie Fields
Alan Keyes

I'm sure there are many more i'm failing to note... but you get the picture. It's surely not unheard of for the gay bashers to either be gay or have gay family members.

Sickening, really.
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
I'm mostly pissed that these idiots are gay----they are really giving gay people a bad name. I think we should demand equal time about all the child-molsting degenerate heterosexuals as well...an stupid evil shit is a stupid evil shit, and yet what seems to be being made the most of about these guys is that they are "Them eee-vile homersexshuuls". Sexuality has nothing to do with it--they were all just fucking perves.


Sorry, but the hits will keep on coming. While the VAST majority of sex crimes are committed by heteros, I think we'll keep hearing about the homo ones because it's just so much more fun to demonize fags. Right now, right-wingers get to use their own people's misdeeds to marginalise a group they are already targeting- isn't that just ducky? I shudder to think what they'd do to Jesus.

And sexuality does have something to do with it too- repressed sexuality, that is. This conspiracy of repression that the right wing seeks to standardise can only lead to more outbursts, as a person really cannot change the nature of who they are by lying about it. They can't change it by going to church, popping out a bunch of unwanted kids, marrying someone to whom they are not really attracted, or living a life of resigned despair. Who on earth would want to take advice from people like this?

The only way to deal with this demon is in the light. ONLY when gay people are at ease in our society to be who they really are will we be able to address this phenomena head on, but don't hold your breath. "Fine upstanding citizens" always need someone to look down their noses at to come out looking better by comparison. I'm afraid homos will be it as long as we, as a society, allow it. For too many people, they feel that as long as it's homos being marginalised, their little sub-group is safe.

Look at how pathetic we've done with paedophilia- a predominantly heterosexual issue. Actually, the victims don't determine whether a person is hetero or homo in that one, that is mainly determined by their lifestyle, which is largely married men. Yeah, we're really going to start going after that one. *rolls eyes*. As many as one in THREE girls will be molested by the time she's 14, but for some reason all we hear about anymore is the boys who get it. Ain't that special? I think a proven incident of paedophelia where the victim is 10 or under should carry the death penalty automatically on the FIRST incident. Fuckers would think twice once a few of those were televised. A whole fucking lot of social misfits would be out of our way by now, instead of going on to molest hundreds and hundreds more victims, thus continuing the cycle. But who asked me?

Hypocrites are just so easy to spot, and so completely predictable. I think what pissed me off the most is that after years of KNOWING that this is how the human psyche works, we still find assholes with the audacity to say "Well, I never say THAT coming!"

Why not? What gives ANYONE the right to be that fucking stupid?
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
I've not heard this one, but it wouldn't really surprise me. Having a lesbian daughter seems to be the hallmark of being a represser of gays. Let's take a few moments to note some of the more popular i-have-a-lesbian-daughter-but-hate-gays fanatics.

Sonny Bono
Dick Cheney
Bob Corker
Dick Gephardt
Newt Gingrich (well, it's his sister, but close enough)
Sadie Fields
Alan Keyes

I'm sure there are many more i'm failing to note... but you get the picture. It's surely not unheard of for the gay bashers to either be gay or have gay family members.

Sickening, really.

I see this sort of differently.

Just about everyone (not just gay-bashers) has a lesbian daughter or sister or aunt. Or a gay nephew or brother-in-law. Statistically, that's pretty much obvious. The gay-bashers are no different - it's just more sadly ironic, and not a quirk of statistics.

Rather than point out that irony, I think it's much more important that members of the larger population realize that same-sex rights issues affect people they love, directly.
 

goffer009

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Posts
26
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Location
Germany
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
I see this sort of differently.

Just about everyone (not just gay-bashers) has a lesbian daughter or sister or aunt. Or a gay nephew or brother-in-law. Statistically, that's pretty much obvious. The gay-bashers are no different - it's just more sadly ironic, and not a quirk of statistics.

Rather than point out that irony, I think it's much more important that members of the larger population realize that same-sex rights issues affect people they love, directly.
RJR, I agree with you 100%!!