I can only post an opinion from which I've drawn working as
a CNA and having mostly male patients for close to ten years.
According to what I've seen,
Height HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DICK SIZE.
Again,
this has been my experience. I have seen most of
my past employers soft, however. Nevertheless, the discrepancy
that existed among them was far too extreme, even
being soft, to chalk the difference up to " showing and
growing".
A five inch soft dick is going to be above average size
when hard, we can reasonably assume that.
I had a 6'5" patient who was a decorated WWII general
and I had a hard time seeing his dick.
Soft, it was as small as a childs.
I mean teeny small, not just small.
He needed to fiddle around with his fingers to
grasp it when peeing, and even that was
messy due to its short length.
Then, I had a patient (my friends father) who came
from Sicily, Italy.
The man was so small, I could hoist him into bed by
scooping him up into my arms, one around his upper
back, the other around the back of his knees.
He barely stood five feet tall.
When removing his pajamas one morning when
I first started taking care of him,
I held him
up with one arm to keep him from falling,
and with the other I attempted to grab the
leg portion of his pants and yank them off.
I was quite far down around his knee area while I was
about to do this.
I gave a hard yank and this guy started
hollerin like a freakin banchee.
It turns out I had gabbed the end of his cock
and yanked it like a church bell.
Soft, he was an easy six inches and unusually
thick. It almost appeared sausage like and
not really like a dick.
Now I know why he had five children in rapid succession.
Another buddy of mine from years back,
had hands like a little girl.
He was short and skinny and reminded me
of the singer "Prince".
Yet, in the cock department, he was bigger than
the rest of us.
I realize these examples can be the exception,
but I've personally seen them repeated too often
to be coincidences.
As some have already stated,
THERE ARE NO CONSISTENT ANATOMIC PHALLIC
CORRELATIONS on men, at least none that
are 100% trustworthy.
Now about the walk-"gate"-
being a possible indication for size,
I don't know.
Strangely, and for reasons I can't quite
articulate, I would say it's not entirely
impossible.