Anyone believe in Natural Order...like this?

Discussion in 'Relationships, Discrimination, and Jealousy' started by manplezrks, Apr 13, 2009.

  1. manplezrks

    manplezrks New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    KC/DC/NY
    In my experience, men I know who have XL cocks tend to be more Alpha types...and smaller men I know (gay and str8) feel somehow they must submit to the larger-cocked males...both sexually and non-sexually.

    I think there is really something natural about submission to a larger specimen...thoughts?
     
  2. dongalong

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    5,311
    Likes Received:
    1,773
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Paris (FR)
    Size in general, be it height or build would also give a natural advantage for some people but others achieve the same Alpha male status with their superior intelligence and communication skills.
    One thing that their natural advantage gives them is confidence, which tends to make less confident men more submissive.
     
  3. larocca

    larocca New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    636
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Croatia
    It does seem like a natural thing. For example, in porn, I am stunned when a guy with a much bigger penis than the other one ends up bottoming. It just seems weird to me.
     
  4. manplezrks

    manplezrks New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    KC/DC/NY
    so true, but I have heard of many big-dicked bottoms. a waste, I think!
     
  5. Corius

    Corius New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Michigan
    IMHO, that list of things that make for the "leader type" would have to be much longer. Let's face it, we don't get to check out a man's endowment right off the bat. I am tall and the only thing that I find is that the ladies in the supermarket are more likely to ask me to fetch something from a high shelf than are to ask a shorter or more handsome guy. Get off it: it's not what you have but what you do with what you have. My observations lead me to believe that a super-size in cocks is no guarantee of anything that's really important.
     
  6. StraightDave

    StraightDave New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Alabama
    Exactly. How would any weak minded, submissive beta-male know who he should submit to? lol

    Of course, well endowed guys will likely have more confidence with women, or maybe it's more accurate to say smaller guys are more likely to have problems with a lack of confidence. I've spoke with several big, even huge dicked guys on thevisualiser site who said they're terrible with women, suck at talkin to em, lack confidence, etc. Simply having a big one doesn't make you an alphamale. And of course, there are plenty of small and average dudes who are as cocky, arrogant, assertive, and dominant as you can get.

    In pornography, especially various fetish related stuff like femdom/sph/cuckolding, the topic creator's comments ring true. I mean as a fan of this type of stuff, I do in fact feel more submissive towards bigger dicked guys. But this is almost purely fantasy. Some guys who engage in it might honestly believe it, but the overwhelming majority of us know it's all an act, all for fun, I'd say ALL the women involved in it feel the same.

    In the real world, your natural order stuff is hogwash.
     
    #6 StraightDave, Apr 13, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2009
Draft saved Draft deleted