Anyone else dislike Queens, Nelly, or femme men?

earllogjam

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
4,917
Media
0
Likes
179
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
We must all conform to what the majority says is appropriate behavior. Assimilate now or face complete and utter annihilation. Sissies your days are numbered.

We are Borg, resistance is futile.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Posts
3,028
Media
0
Likes
28
Points
123
If gay men want to be effeminate, they should be allowed that option. If straight men want to be effeminate, they should be allowed that option. If lesbians want to be masculine, they should be allowed that option. If straight women want to be masculine, they should be allowed that option. I look forward to the day when sexual determination and gender presentation are not seen as necessarily linked and compliance with the cliches doesn't feel like the only option (i.e. naturally masculine guys who might play up the queeniness in order to have more gay visibility), but blanket hating on any of the above groups is not going to expedite it.


Tell the truth! Agreed.
 

Hotasballs

Admired Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Posts
88
Media
14
Likes
835
Points
303
Location
New York, NY
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Anyone hate overally macho men who try to "alpha" in every situation? Who have to make everything a competition and do everything that a "man" should?
What a bullshit question. Mine are as dumb as yours. Let's just try to judge each person solely on their individual personality rather than rash generalizations
 

invisibleman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Posts
9,816
Media
0
Likes
495
Points
303
Location
North Carolina
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
We must all conform to what the majority says is appropriate behavior. Assimilate now or face complete and utter annihilation. Sissies your days are numbered.

We are Borg, resistance is futile.


Beyotch, please. The Oracle said that I can do whatever I please in THE GAYTRIX.
 
Last edited:
4

458409

Guest
It was drag queens, nelly boys and fems that fought back at Stonewall back in 1969. Without them, we may not even have a LPSG board. You think we as a nation would be able to have open discussions about someone's penis online without the ability to co-exist with people who are homosexual?

Respect your roots. ALL of them. That has nothing to do with who you want to fuck. :rolleyes:

That's bullshit of course we could have LPSG without stonewall. It's a site about sex, human anatomy, and it's not a "gay" site. You really are giving WAY TOO much credit to stonewall when there's no point to it, and we're not all brainwashed queens like yourself who live in the gay ghetto of Chelsea NYC, and we GLBT people would have gotten our rights anyway even without stonewall which is an overrated sacred cow that is pointlessly brought up yearly to claim diversity when there is no such thing as this among GLBT people and there's no such thing as a GLBT community. :rolleyes: In the history of the world and humanity Stonewall does not mean shit. I'm sorry that you are such a conformist fool who has bought into liberal Gay politics, the Stalanist Gay Party, and the PC-Overkill of being an urban gay man who is really a brainwashed dogmatic Prude and Puritain at heart. As far as Stonewall goes it was way too chaotic and crazy to have anyone actually know if a nelly guy or Drag queen really did throw the first limp wristed punch in Stonewall.
 
4

458409

Guest
Flamboyantly gay guys can get annoying since they are highly obnoxious. Yes I understand you're gay. Yes I understand you're comfortable with your sexuality and don't care what other people think about it. No I don't need to be reminded that you're gay every 5 minutes. People that take one aspect of their lives and use it to define themselves completely are usually shallow, boring. or seriously psychologically fucked up underneath their overly exuberant facade. In my experience, "overly flamboyantly" ANYTHING almost always equals: "Mask For Insecurity."
 

invisibleman

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Posts
9,816
Media
0
Likes
495
Points
303
Location
North Carolina
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
As far as Stonewall goes it was way too chaotic and crazy to have anyone actually know if a nelly guy or Drag queen really did throw the first limp wristed punch in Stonewall.

:rolleyes:

Flamboyantly gay guys can get annoying since they are highly obnoxious. Yes I understand you're gay. Yes I understand you're comfortable with your sexuality and don't care what other people think about it. No I don't need to be reminded that you're gay every 5 minutes. People that take one aspect of their lives and use it to define themselves completely are usually shallow, boring. or seriously psychologically fucked up underneath their overly exuberant facade. In my experience, "overly flamboyantly" ANYTHING almost always equals: "Mask For Insecurity."


But I think that you are most certainly wrong in your assessment that flamboyance is a MASK FOR INSECURITY. You could use that same argument for hypermasculinity. I could say that extreme butchiness could be a disguise. Overcompensation for being a total femme. Every man...every woman hides behind something. And sometimes it isn't about gender roles or sexual orientation. People use religion as a mask to hide their true unevolved selves.

As far as being reminded every five minutes by someone that they're gay. Straight men and women have let people know that they are straight. So what. People do take aspects of their lives and build around them as well. That is human nature. Women do that. Men do that.
 
Last edited:

shadow28

Expert Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
320
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
533
Wow, this is quite the political thread, but the original question is interesting.

I have many "nelly / femme / queeny" friends and they are all wonderful people. So no, I don't dislike them.

But I do not find them sexually attractive at all. I prefer masculine men, and that's no judgement against anyone who isn't, it's just what I like.

There should be nothing political in an individual's sexual preference. And in this country (Canada) at least, there is less now than ever before. As our late great PM Pierre Trudeau said, "the State has no place in the bedrooms of the nation".

Many would say that the more radical and perhaps more feminine gay men have been responsible for the majority of the human rights advances to which the larger LGBT community has grown accustomed. I am extremely grateful for their contributions. However, it does not make them any more attractive to me, physically.

To each his own I guess.
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
That's bullshit of course we could have LPSG without stonewall. It's a site about sex, human anatomy, and it's not a "gay" site. You really are giving WAY TOO much credit to stonewall when there's no point to it, and we're not all brainwashed queens like yourself who live in the gay ghetto of Chelsea NYC, and we GLBT people would have gotten our rights anyway even without stonewall which is an overrated sacred cow that is pointlessly brought up yearly to claim diversity when there is no such thing as this among GLBT people and there's no such thing as a GLBT community. :rolleyes: In the history of the world and humanity Stonewall does not mean shit. I'm sorry that you are such a conformist fool who has bought into liberal Gay politics, the Stalanist Gay Party, and the PC-Overkill of being an urban gay man who is really a brainwashed dogmatic Prude and Puritain at heart. As far as Stonewall goes it was way too chaotic and crazy to have anyone actually know if a nelly guy or Drag queen really did throw the first limp wristed punch in Stonewall.

My public and my endearing fans... how they love me so??!? So sorry to see you go, although I'm sure it's not going to stop you from making another fake account and come back. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

B_am12388

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Posts
618
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
101
Age
35
Location
Newport Beach, CA
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
:rolleyes:




But I think that you are most certainly wrong in your assessment that flamboyance is a MASK FOR INSECURITY. You could use that same argument for hypermasculinity. I could say that extreme butchiness could be a disguise. Overcompensation for being a total femme. Every man...every woman hides behind something. And sometimes it isn't about gender roles or sexual orientation. People use religion as a mask to hide their true unevolved selves.

As far as being reminded every five minutes by someone that they're gay. Straight men and women have let people know that they are straight. So what. People do take aspects of their lives and build around them as well. That is human nature. Women do that. Men do that.

Preach it honey!!!!!!!!!! :biggrin1:
 

dolfette

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
11,303
Media
0
Likes
108
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
rejoined and banned again. sheesh.

do you get the feeling his camp boyfriend left him?
of that his crush ditched him in favour of a queen?

either way his shrill, bitchy tantrum is the very cliche he claims to hate.
 

D_Tim McGnaw

Account Disabled
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Posts
5,420
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
133
Camp doesn't mean decietful and insecure, and Masculine doesn't mean honest and self assured.

There are nice people and nasty people, some people are nasty and nice. Massive and unpleasant generalisations about huge numbers of people aren't a rational argument.

I know totally straight guys who are camp as a row of pink tents, and gay guys who could have auditioned for old timey cigarette adverts. In my experience relative masculinity has very little to do with sexuality. I'm attracted to hot guys, totally camp and totally masculine and everything in between. It's fashionable with some gay guys to hate on camp, I'm not sure why ( maybe it's climate change, maybe it's an alignment of planets ) but personally I like to make my decisions on people based on more than whether or not they call me Sweetie or crush my hand shaking it.
 

B_henry miller

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Posts
2,917
Media
0
Likes
175
Points
193
Location
Big Sur, California
Gender
Male
It's a societal double standard based on the sexist idea that men are better than women. Women who act feminine are accepted by society; women who act masculine are also accepted by society. But men are expected to only behave in a way that is masculine, because it is perceived that for a man to behave as a woman or in a feminine way is to take a step down in the social hierarchy.