Anyone with morals on this site?

[Calboner]

Oh, it's probably because it's almost 4 in the middle of the night here.. but this cracked me up! Hahaha! xD

Ba da boom!

 

[ManofThunder]

Ba da boom!

Just so you know...I have several holes, none of which are for you. :biggrin1:

 

[Chase1600]

I’ll assume TheRenn has departed.

He raised a decent enough question. His posts betrayed a different agenda.

Each of us should accept responsibility for being the person we are. We should let others do the same and respect them for it.

He’s wrong, there are ethical people here. There are religious believers here. Members of LPSG often discuss doing the right thing vs. the wrong thing. I’ve seen posts in which members object to hurting spouses and trusting significant others; I’ve read posts in which members display great concern over the immorality of risking disease or spreading disease to others; many members show great respect for the sensitivities and feelings of others, for being honest, for respecting the privacy of others.

Many LPSG discussions address ways in which we maintain personal respect for our own dignity as sexual persons and accept responsibility for adult behavior.

Very importantly, we are all meticulously respectful of underage minors and do not accept any breech of laws or morals with respect to minors.

But let’s not let TheRenn confuse us. This is a forum for discussions of penises. We are about sex. If people think discussions of sex are immoral, they will think discussions in our forums are immoral, and given what they think, if they want to be moral, they should not be here.

Nothing about LPSG.org implies it is a site or forum for specific religious discussions of sex. It is not a place for evangelizing [it’s OK if you are an evangelist]. Those discussions might have a place; this is not it.

Nothing about our organizations suggests we impose our morals upon one another. We needn’t apologize for them, there’s room here for people with strong moral footing; many people here show it, but it isn’t a religious site. It is OK for us to ask others for their opinions if we are struggling with our own moral or religious questions about our own sexual experiences. Asking others for help isn’t preaching to them.

Indeed, most definitely indeed, because this is a place for people who want to talk about sex, we should welcome everyone – invite everyone – with something to offer on the subject. There might be many members here who do not come off as particularly moral about these things. We don’t judge. It’s none of our business and no one should be afraid to post what’s on his mind because he might come off as not being moral.

I hope no LPSG member would be intimidated by a stranger’s moralizing. I hope we stick together and do not let moralizers bully members.

 

[tgirlsrgreat]

My question is, "How can you safeguard against a woman cheating on you with some dumb idiot who happens to catch her fancy one day?"

my first reaction was to tell you just to piss off, you are an asshole! but i think it warrants some more. why do you think that the woman is going to cheat and not the man?

find a woman who makes you happy and the two of you work toward making it a strong relationship.

p.s. don't bring god into everything.

 

[unzipped]

You can't stop her from cheating.. it is her committment / love for you or myself that keeps her in check... conversly same applies to us dicks..

 

[maxcok]

First off, could you please learn how to use the quote function so we know who and what you're responding to? It's that little button that says "quote" at the bottom of each post. Simple.

O.K. Mr. Cranky.

Don't confuse a formidable challenge to abject bullshit with crankiness.
You grossly overestimate yourself if you think you've made me the least bit cranky.

See, why is it that whenever anyone brings up religion, there's always this default defensiveness that comes out?

I'm not the least bit defensive either. Unlike many people, I don't have a problem with religion per se.

Everyone thinks they know what Christianity is about. They think it's all about a list of do's and don'ts and living life in a state of self-inflicted fear.

There's not a damn thing you can tell me about Christianity I don't already know. I was raised in the South surrounded by bible bangers, and I have many close relationships with Catholics. However, in my own moderate mainstream freethinking Christian home, the lessons of the church were simply expressions of a fundamental humanistic morality and ethic, parables for conducting one's life with generosity, kindness, consideration and appreciation. I have since vastly expanded my spiritual horizons and undertaken an independent comparative study of world religions and philosophy, and I well understand the origins, the overlap, the parallels, and the common threads.

As in any religion, there are good Christians and bad Christians, and I'm not aware of anyone on this board who's been more vocal in distinguishing and defending the former against the actions and rhetoric of the latter. Good Christians do not pass judgement on others, nor do they express the misogynistic attitudes you do, calling women with sexual experience "hoes", which in my mind clearly places you with the latter - the stone throwers, the Pharisees. In addition, you impress me as a "conditional Christian", fitting the "do's and don'ts" to suit your convenience, to justify and excuse your own self-centered desires.

The funny thing is, it can be incredibly empowering and give life new meaning, answers to questions like 'What is our purpose here?' and 'Why was I (specifically) put here on this earth?'

I'm glad for you if you're comfortable in thinking you've found definitive answers to those questions. Hopefully you came to understanding through your own life experience, reflection and contemplation, not just because it was preached to you. Regardless, it's plain arrogance to think your answers may be superior to others' answers, or even others' lack of resolution on these most monumental of questions.

But I'm not dense. I understand that everyone goes about trying to understand the world around them in different ways. There's no one right path to going about having a relationship with the Creator. Whether someone goes about doing this via Judaism, Christianity, Islam, or any other religion is irrelevant (if you ask me, Judaism-Christianity-Islam are like Acts I,II, and III of the same play).

If Christianity is Act III of the three act play, should we conclude from that it provides the final resolution and supercedes the acts that came before, namely Judaism and Islam?

However, what I don't subscribe to is this idea that truth is relative. That I do not accept. There is ONE truth and ONE truth only. If we can accept this, then I believe that we can live more conscious lives.

That may or may not be true, but I find the way you expressed it somewhat trite and platitudinous. I don't necessarily see a high level of 'consciousness' reflected in your words either, particularly in your OP. That's not surprising or out of character though. I have noticed in past encounters on the board you display a rather unoriginal and simplistic mode of thinking.

And to answer your question, no, I don't condemn gays. I believe that God created gays for a reason. They should be treated just like anyone else, based on their own individual merit. In fact, gays gave me a lot of breaks in my life.

I'm mildly curious to know for what "reason" you think your god "created" LGBT people. Do you also believe LGBT people are equal to heterosexuals in the eyes of your god? Since you believe "they should be treated just like anyone else", do you believe they have an equal right to marry and have children according to your idealized view of family life? Do believe think they are deserving of all the same rights and privileges heterosexuals enjoy, e.g. in employment, marriage tax credits, Social Security benefits, inheritance, etc.? Finally, do you believe laws should be written or amended to protect and guarantee their equal rights?

And I'm sorry if me saying 'balls' was too crude for you. I apologize.

As you well know, I didn't say it was too crude for me, which means you're being deliberately deceitful, and your 'apology' is sarcastic and disingenuous. What would Jesus think of your underhanded, dishonest debate tactics? At the same time, I can't help but notice you failed to answer the second half of that same question, "Does your god approve of you talking about "balls" in polite company and calling women "hoes"?"

I said it before and I'll say it again. I am no different than anybody else. I sin habitually, but I do try to be the best person I can be. And why is it that just being on a forum like this is wrong? I don't necessarily feel that way, although it does distract me from doing more important things.

It's hypocritical of you to try to occupy some morally superior position and judge others for their "sin", while you are engaging in "sin" according to your own definition. Hypocrisy - another hallmark of judgemental Christians, excusing their "bad" behavior by protesting "I am no different than anybody else", while "habitually" continuing the behavior. Isn't the whole point of being a Christian to be "different", to be a better person?

Anyway, you need to chill out, bro. I'm sorry if you had bad experiences with religious types in the past, but don't paint us all with the same brush. :redface:

I'm only painting you with the brush you handed me through your own Holier-than-Thou words, dear Pharisee.
If you don't like the picture, maybe you should get a new brush, and/or take a good long hard look in the mirror.

Again, you overestimate yourself if you think I'm anything but "chill". You should see how chill I am when someone tries relentlessly to prosthelytize to me IRL. I can outquote them chapter and verse, turning their spoonfed version of Christianity inside out and upside down, until they're reduced to a stammering mass of confusion and questioning their own faith at its shallow core. Why it's really something to behold.

In conclusion, I sincerely hope that after you get your fill sowing your self-justified wild oats, screwing around with all the loose "hoes", and jacking off to the big cocks on LPSG, you'll find yourself a nice virginal little 'Christian' girl to settle down with and make lots and lots of good 'Christian' babies. Good luck with all that. :wink:

 

[Drifterwood]

Later.

Thank fucking god.

 

[B_subgirrl]

Hi,

I'm obviously not an innocent person (done things I'm not proud of). Also, being I'm a quasi-member on this site, to most of the world I'm probably kind of a pervert.

So I'm not trying to be holier than thou, but are there any members here with character, or morals?

There are a few reasons I ask:

1) A lot of members talk about random hookups with hoeish women (come on, while it is a turn-on to read about women who are enthusiastic about our dicks, these women are pretty much hoes).

2) A lot of members hook up with these hoeish women while drunk, or meet them in a bar.

Now, this worries me because I would like to think that when I get married, the woman I marry will not be the type to slink away with another man because he happens to be bigger than me (I don't care how big you are, there's always someone bigger, so don't give me that bullshit).

Yet, as I read these anecdotes, that's exactly what seems to be happening (assuming these stories are true, which some probably are).

So I guess what I'm saying is, it seems like great fun to talk about different encounters and 'noches de pasion' with strange women, but this behavior seems to be anathema to a healthy, one might say, Godly relationship.

Now, I'm inexperienced in the marriage realm, so hopefully, those of you who are married can provide some insight.

I'm just a guy who wants to make ONE women very happy one day, preferably a woman who has high enough morals and self-restraint not to sleep around with other men.

My question is, "How can you safeguard against a woman cheating on you with some dumb idiot who happens to catch her fancy one day?"

I'm thinking date and marry church-going people only. That's all I've got. I haven't really come up with any other solutions yet.

What a woman (or man) does when single is no indicator at all of what she will do when in a relationship.

And of course people here have morals. They just happen to be different to yours

 

[B_ILIW]

Hi,

I'm obviously not an innocent person (done things I'm not proud of). Also, being I'm a quasi-member on this site, to most of the world I'm probably kind of a pervert.

So I'm not trying to be holier than thou, but are there any members here with character, or morals?

There are a few reasons I ask:

1) A lot of members talk about random hookups with hoeish women (come on, while it is a turn-on to read about women who are enthusiastic about our dicks, these women are pretty much hoes).

2) A lot of members hook up with these hoeish women while drunk, or meet them in a bar.

Now, this worries me because I would like to think that when I get married, the woman I marry will not be the type to slink away with another man because he happens to be bigger than me (I don't care how big you are, there's always someone bigger, so don't give me that bullshit).

Yet, as I read these anecdotes, that's exactly what seems to be happening (assuming these stories are true, which some probably are).

So I guess what I'm saying is, it seems like great fun to talk about different encounters and 'noches de pasion' with strange women, but this behavior seems to be anathema to a healthy, one might say, Godly relationship.

Now, I'm inexperienced in the marriage realm, so hopefully, those of you who are married can provide some insight.

I'm just a guy who wants to make ONE women very happy one day, preferably a woman who has high enough morals and self-restraint not to sleep around with other men.

My question is, "How can you safeguard against a woman cheating on you with some dumb idiot who happens to catch her fancy one day?"

I'm thinking date and marry church-going people only. That's all I've got. I haven't really come up with any other solutions yet.

morals are relative. besides people here are of a more liberal, sexual bent. most of Western society is.

 

[D_Flesshewer Timbergirth]

too ugly

 

[azladd]

dude - if your perception of relationships in the real world is that colored by ONE website, or MANY pornographic websites, for that matter, I would suggest perhaps broadening your horizons.

ps - Is this a real question/dilemma anyway?

pps - since when have church and morals been mutually exclusive?

Couldn't have said it any better.

 

[Lambycake]

I have the highest of moral standards. I don't eat the cum of just anyone out of my wife's cunt. The guy must be a close friend whom I truly care about.

I'm with bi_mff

The real question I have is: Why do people come to a website and solicit the advice of people they dont know and then want to argue with these people they dont know? It makes no sense to me. Get a therapist, talk to a friend you trust, or figure it out for yourself.

 

[OCMuscleJock]

Wow...just wow. I cannot even believe the OP felt inclined to post anything like this. Mainly because of the MULTITUDE of beliefs that people have on here. Not everyone is Christian, Buddist, Muslim or whatever...some are Agnostic and even athiest. Morality is different for everyone. Also, why is it people with no pics, filled out REAL profiles or those do not contribute to the site at all, all the sudden pop up and say stuff that is DEFINITELY going to offend someone. Just sayin'

 

[D_Alvin Allrod]

I just don't understand why you posed this question on THIS site. You are addicted to a site that you are convicted about, and yet you are trying to be a 'moral' person. I understand that you admit that you too have faults and this is one of them. However, this is pointless and going nowhere, you need to choose now if you want to be 'moral' or stay here, BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY: it was rediculous to expect answers here in the first place if you wanted a 'moral' one. Grow a pair and ask another man who has a successful mairraige. And btw, you will probably find the most God fearing man, with the best mairrage, outside of the traditional church, as it is an institution of man, and has no power to help anybody apart from God.

Clarification: I am not saying that there are no people with morals here. I am saying probably very few who adhere to "traditional christian' morals.

 

[maxcok]

. . . . Also, why is it people with no pics, filled out REAL profiles or those do not contribute to the site at all, all the sudden pop up and say stuff that is DEFINITELY going to offend someone. Just sayin'

Probly he was instructed by the Lord.

 

[brklynboy]

It's your version of god, you a##hole. Don't even try to impose your narrow minded, sexist version of morality on me. Why don't you take your fundamentalist crap some place else. You let your 'pastor' think for you. I think for myself. Oh, wasn't it Christ who told the religious hypocrites who were about to stone a 'fallen' woman ' Let he who is without sin cast the first stone". Forgot that didn't you.[/QUOTE

Agreed! Take your fundamentalist crap someplace else and let us "sinners" enjoy our time in Eden!

 

[HiddenLacey]

*snip*
1) A lot of members talk about random hookups with hoeish women (come on, while it is a turn-on to read about women who are enthusiastic about our dicks, these women are pretty much hoes).

2) A lot of members hook up with these hoeish women while drunk, or meet them in a bar.

So I guess what I'm saying is, it seems like great fun to talk about different encounters and 'noches de pasion' with strange women, but this behavior seems to be anathema to a healthy, one might say, Godly relationship.

I'm just a guy who wants to make ONE women very happy one day, preferably a woman who has high enough morals and self-restraint not to sleep around with other men.

My question is, "How can you safeguard against a woman cheating on you with some dumb idiot who happens to catch her fancy one day?"

I'm thinking date and marry church-going people only. That's all I've got. I haven't really come up with any other solutions yet.

I like men. I like sex. I am quite enthusiastic about dick. I have what I consider to be morals. I personally find your post to be offensive towards the female gender. Should women be held to a different set of standards than men?

There is no way to safe guard against a PERSON cheating on you. Some people cheat, it happens.

Going to church has nothing to do with whether or not someone cheats.

 

[Incocknito]

Yeah he seems quite against women. Any woman who isn't having sex with him is "hoeish" every guy - except him - is a "dumb idiot".

I think Renn is a pretty good example of what going to church does for you. Obviously he has been institutionalised.

 

[xxnineinchxx]

I like men. I like sex. I am quite enthusiastic about dick. I have what I consider to be morals. I personally find your post to be offensive towards the female gender. Should women be held to a different set of standards than men?

There is no way to safe guard against a PERSON cheating on you. Some people cheat, it happens.

Going to church has nothing to do with whether or not someone cheats.

god bless you sg!

 

[D_Relentless Original]

I like men. I like sex. I am quite enthusiastic about dick. I have what I consider to be morals. I personally find your post to be offensive towards the female gender. Should women be held to a different set of standards than men?

There is no way to safe guard against a PERSON cheating on you. Some people cheat, it happens.

Going to church has nothing to do with whether or not someone cheats.

QFT!! This poster says it all ^ excellent post.