Are Black Men Bigger?

[madame_zora]

Please don't presume to speak for Black people.

I don't. I presume to speak for myself against racism in general. And sexism. And homophobia. And any kind of discrimination I find.

 

[Lordpendragon]

I am not from the USA and I do not share your cultural experience of Race.

I do need to say though that I find the dehumanised exploitation of this myth deeply disturbing with regards to the producers, the exploited and the consumers.

When I consider the motivation and psychology of the consumers, the conclusions that I lean towards are unpleasant on many levels. I have more experience in understanding the exploited and the exploiters.

 

[Lex]

I don't. I presume to speak for myself against racism in general. And sexism. And homophobia. And any kind of discrimination I find.

MZ--I couldn't have said it better myself. All discrimination is destructive and should be fought. It's not about speaking FOR anyone as it is about speaking OUT against that which is WRONG.

If you love it, it's an archetype. If you hate it; it's a stereotype. Go figure.

 

[rawbone8]

wonders which great american Nazi admirer will replace the new Lindbergh avatar?
Henry Ford?

you know that discriminate has alternate meanings in popular usage and that is a fact

there can be no doubt which meaning the previous posters intended

 

[EbonyOnly]

As a Gay male exclusively into BLACK men.......many times........many many times....my WHITE 9.5 X 7.5 was the biggest in a room of many MANY Black men.

Donna, men love their cocks. It's who we are. Black men may not post here, but their are several sites dedicated to Black cock where both Homo / Hetro Black men post pictures of their cocks.

My I suggest when you only use salt on your food, and add Black pepper, the taste of the food changes. Same as with human sexuality. Variety, is the spice of life. Sterotyping Black males is the Mandingo image. Black men who's cocks aren't of superhuman size have many internal to " measure up " to the Mandingo theory.

Black PEOPLE are more free with their emotions. Again, a different variation from the White population.

May I ask, are you interested in the person or just the size of the cock. For the measure of a man doesn't begin below his belt.

 

[Lordpendragon]

Freedom of speech is critical.

I only remember how much I am repulsed by racists, sexists and bigots of all kinds, when I hear them speak, particularly when they try to give their ignorance an intellectual foundation.

 

[madame_zora]

Freedom of speech is critical.

I only remember how much I am repulsed by racists, sexists and bigots of all kinds, when I hear them speak, particularly when they try to give their ignorance an intellectual foundation.

You speak my thoughts as well. I want these kinds of people to be free to speak, if only to allow the majority to remind ourselves of our horrific past. We can never relax our vigilance against these ideas lest they return our society to the dark ages. Progress comes slow enough.

 

[Lex]

The ability to discriminate is an important factor in general intelligence; it is believed to have a genetic basis.

There are obvious ("Darwinian reproductive") advantages to those who are more able to discern between a (malignity) and b (benignity). "Fighting" discrimination is as futile as "fighting", perhaps, lying, of which there is evidence to suggest that a genetic basis might be present.

I meant Discrimination as in treating people differently and unfairly due to differences, NOT discrimination as in telling the difference between warm and cold. You KNOW what I meant ChimeraTX and we both know this. Stop being a juvenile ASS by attempting to interject every fucking conversation on the board with your Nazi bullshit. Thanks. It's SO fucking tiring. I bet you get sent to the principal's office all the time. Lord knows I wish I could give you a lengthy time out.

 

[B_Spladle]

My intension was to implicitly address the supposed connotation (2).

Quit being such a douche. Jesus.

 

[longbaugh]

I can't believe this thread is still going strong


Amazing

 

[madame_zora]

I am not so naïve as to believe that "...truth shall prevail" in all situations; I hope that recent and future events will encourage people to re-evalute their opinions, and the supposed truths that underly them.

Except that this current administration, while annoying NOW, is actually serving a purpose in underlining the stupidity of the beliefs it represents. It is showing us what human nature is capable of if left UNCHECKED. The thing is, we ARE capable of more than our instincts. Thinking people everywhere need to show the animals what human beings are made of. Sorry Chimera, I know you can argue better than me, but that will have no effect on the will of the world. You and I are inconsequential in the eventual outcome. Slavery is over. Women work. We as a society will continue to move forward despite the desperate clingings of people like yourself.

 

[black_hung]

Can we stop comparing different races to each other when it comes to penis size. I used to believe differently(I'm prepared to admit that), I now believe there is no difference when it comes to penis size and racial origin. There are hung guys who are black, white, and asian. Guys with small/average penis come from every racial origin.

 

[Matthew]

Donna, men love their cocks. It's who we are.

People are still responding to Donna. I love it when a thread stays on track.

 

[B_Latin Dong]

Donna = Jewish propaganda
or
Donna = Black dude

 

[Matthew]

Latin Dong = Stacked.

Now there's a blast from the past -- mmmm, make that more of a mild fizzle than a 'blast.'

 

[Lex]

I am not a neo-Nazi. You have been offered an out-clause, but as you have refused it, it would appear you only read and reply to my posts as entertainment or to insult me. I have made my choice; you, yours.

1. I read your posts, hoping against hope that you will learn to at least contribute to the thread topic rather than promoting your own marginalized agenda. Since you can type a coherent sentence I keep thinking that maybe you might have something beneficial to add to this board even TANGENTALLY related to a Penis, Sex, Underwear or SOMETHING.

2. I said Nazi, Not neo-Nazi.

3. Update your thesaurus. Shades of meaning do not make two words equivalent. Words can also have different meanings, which is why definitions are numbered in dictionaries.

4. You are correct. I should have never UN-ignored you. Consider the lesson learned.

 

[Lordpendragon]

You have not seen ignorance until you have been acquainted with the blatant denial of fact by multiculturalists and egalitarianists; albeit well-meaning, perhaps.

It is my belief that life is too short to emerse one's self in moralistic fallacies, no matter how demagogically-phrased, nor how elegantly-spoken.

I have no time intellectually for any of the 'isms, 'ists and 'ities. You may as well sit in a darkened room and self justify.

You totally miss the point - freedom of opportunity. If you don't have the ability to take it, be you black white shades in between and beyond, jewish hindu sikh islamic shinto christian coptic parsee zoroastrian animist atheist agnostic, male female somewhere in between, striaght gay or somewhere in between, it doesn't matter - you have the opporunty.

One race - frankly how dumb to deny us the benefit of talent based on discrimination. No wonder the bigots have a problem with Darwin.

e pluribus unum

 

[B_Spladle]

I am not a neo-Nazi.

Maybe not, but you are without a doubt the biggest douche still contributing this thread, douche.

 

[madame_zora]

Perhaps, but defeatism is the plague of but intelligent minds. I can do little; not nothing. Idealism is the only choice for you and I, madame.

No, "idealism" is a choice for YOU. You have decided to use your mind to inflict damage in the world around you, but it is a choice. You can do little, and that point I grant you is true, but with that little you have chosen stagnation over growth. Good call.

I actually like it when you post, no one is ever won over and that gives me increased respect for human beings.

 

[Freddie53]

The principles are identical. One would not treat an egg in the same manner as they would treat a rock; one would not treat a lion in the same manner as they would treat a mouse.

The concept of "fairness" and "equality" begs the question, "Why should I treat two different people as equal if I would not treat two different animals as equal; if I would not treat two different objects as equal?" Egalitarianism is the result of irrational reactionism, "imperial guilt", the decline of chauvinism, and a result of both the moralistically-fallacious and evolutionarily-incorrect political systems of democracy and socialism; it can be noted that both of the aforementioned may be the result of religious-convictions, the absence of the traditional "ruling-class", and populist revolutions due to demagogic-institutions such as "individualism".
I am not a neo-Nazi. You have been offered an out-clause, but as you have refused it, it would appear you only read and reply to my posts as entertainment or to insult me. I have made my choice; you, yours.

I have no hope of influencing your opionions. But I do want to influence the opionoins of some who might read what you write.

Once again, you have taken a word and twisted its meaning with an analogy. Analogies only help explain. They are not the real thing. In truth, humans are not eggs or rocks. And your meaning of equal is not the meaning in the US Constitution either. You are implying that equal means that everyone is treated exactly the same, gets the same thing and on and on. And it has a name Marxism. The US Consitution is not Marxist in the least.

The word that you have distorted as equal as in equality. All Americans have equal access to the same rights, priledges, advancements and so forth in terms of gernment dealings. Companies of a certain size also have to meet these goals, privedges and rights.

Example:
A job is open down at the government office or a large company. In general, every one has equal access. Age, color gender, religion and culture are not used to determine who is hired. All have equal access to the job. All can apply. But equal? The job requires excellent typing and literate computer skills, Applicant A has never typed before and hasn't ever turned on a computer. Applicant B has an associate degree in computer and keyboard skills. The law requires that applicant A has an equal access to the job. Applicant A can't just be not considered. But when skills tests are adminsitered, applicant B is going to beat applicant A. So applicant A is not hired and applicant B is. But applicant A had an equal access to the job. He just didn't have the skillks required for that job so he wasn't hired.

(OK for the record, a miracle occurrs and applicant A not only discovers where the on button is, but miraculously finds Word Perfect and Office. and types 120 words a minute on an old typwriter with no letters and makes no mistakes. and Applicant B doesn't know where the on switch is on this particular brand and types 15 words a minute with 14 miistakes a minutes, yes Applicant A gets the job. That would of course require a believe in supernatural intervention or an absolute prodigy. But if it happened yeah, hire applicant A.)

In the old days, a black with a master's degree in computer science would be looked over and a white who had to be trained on the job would be hired just becasue the white was a nephew, brother, friend, etc. In this case, there never was equal access to that job. The black applicant never had a chance in hell of being hired. Nevermind the fact that he was the most qualified computer person in the entire county, he never would ever been hired decades ago. There was no equal access.

Again, I have no hopes of changing your mind, I just wanted impressionable young minds to know what equality means.

What pisses off some of you guys is that Applicant A may have been validictorian of her class, honor graduate from college, daughter of the most respected family in the area. But the job requirements never mentioned intelligence, beauty, gender, religion, or advance education. The qualifications are being able to successfully operate a computer in business. Applicant B has those skills. Too bad that appliucant B is a gay black male and applicant A is a brilliant white beauty queen and tenth cousin of the Queen of England. This is what really pisses off people, people with rich family and cultural backgrounds are being passed over by people in the lower and middle class because the job was given based on abiity to do that particular job, not race or family background.