Are black men really bigger?

[ItsAll4Kim]

They may grow more but that does not proof that they will be larger in size while erect. Comprehension of what is being said is key.

Do you comprehend what I wrote? I never stated that it was proof. The point is that flaccid size is not a predictor of erect size.

 

[CURVEDANDTHICKK]

Back in the days of slavery slave owners used to sell their slaves just like farmers do cattle because slaves legally were property just like animals. Of course the strongest slaves were the most valuable. And so just like cattle slave owners used to breed their strongest male slaves and sell the children for profit. Sadly this breeding usually started at young age just as the boy and girl were able to reproduce because the life span of a slave was not long. If the they didn't willingly have sex they would take the boy tie him up and sexually stimulate him for a period of time then force him to rape a female slave in order to be able to ejaculate and get relief.

The belief back then was that the larger a male's genitals were the more fertile he was and was a sign of strength. So the biggest slaves with the largest genitals were used like stud horses. It doesn't take a biology class to explain what the result would be as this practice continued through generations. Obviously the big dick slaves weren't the only ones having babies but selectively allowing the males with the biggest dicks to have the most babies is going to make a difference genetically.

The stereotype of black men having a larger than normal penis also dates back to slavery and for a very ugly reason. To prevent white women from sexually desiring a slave the white men would tell them that black men were sexually very aggressive and their large penises were more like an animal than a man. Basically they made it seem like black males were like an uncontrollable animal when they were sexually aroused and very dangerous. To make their point they would compare the large dark genitals of a horse with the large dark genitals of a slave and say that male slaves had sex just as violently as a horse. Want to guess where the hung like a horse term comes from. Now what's funny is it didn't seem to stop white men from having entire families with females slaves.

The slave trade also effected areas outside of the USA. Most of the Caribbean Islands and some areas of South America were ports where slaves brought from Africa were kept and sold so the same things were practiced there also.

So all of this talk about black men having a large penis has a very ugly history. So to answer the question yes black men historically have larger than average penises. But the reason why is part of one of the most horrible times of American history. Now as attitudes towards mixed race families eased and bloodlines started mixing the averages are closer and statistically it's probably a moot point in 2018.

By the way that mixing goes both ways. Light skin mixed race blacks would sometimes live as white people to have an easier life. Black people readily admit that a lighter skin color or eyes and a straighter hair texture comes from a Caucasian heritage. Caucasians on the other hand don't admit that they might have curly hair or a naturally darker skin tone from black ancestors. So a big dick white man might owe that to a black great, great, grandparent. Just saying.

 

[902369]

Do you comprehend what I wrote? I never stated that it was proof. The point is that flaccid size is not a predictor of erect size.

Comprehension is not your forté. You said the smaller flaccid black guy may be larger than the two white guys. I said that there is no proof that the black guy would be larger. Your original statement implied and presumed that he would be larger. Thankfully you cannot edit posts on LPSG so people can see what a dumbass you are.

 

[902369]

Back in the days of slavery slave owners used to sell their slaves just like farmers do cattle because slaves legally were property just like animals. Of course the strongest slaves were the most valuable. And so just like cattle slave owners used to breed their strongest male slaves and sell the children for profit. Sadly this breeding usually started at young age just as the boy and girl were able to reproduce because the life span of a slave was not long. If the they didn't willingly have sex they would take the boy tie him up and sexually stimulate him for a period of time then force him to rape a female slave in order to be able to ejaculate and get relief.

The belief back then was that the larger a male's genitals were the more fertile he was and was a sign of strength. So the biggest slaves with the largest genitals were used like stud horses. It doesn't take a biology class to explain what the result would be as this practice continued through generations. Obviously the big dick slaves weren't the only ones having babies but selectively allowing the males with the biggest dicks to have the most babies is going to make a difference genetically.

The stereotype of black men having a larger than normal penis also dates back to slavery and for a very ugly reason. To prevent white women from sexually desiring a slave the white men would tell them that black men were sexually very aggressive and their large penises were more like an animal than a man. Basically they made it seem like black males were like an uncontrollable animal when they were sexually aroused and very dangerous. To make their point they would compare the large dark genitals of a horse with the large dark genitals of a slave and say that male slaves had sex just as violently as a horse. Want to guess where the hung like a horse term comes from. Now what's funny is it didn't seem to stop white men from having entire families with females slaves.

The slave trade also effected areas outside of the USA. Most of the Caribbean Islands and some areas of South America were ports where slaves brought from Africa were kept and sold so the same things were practiced there also.

So all of this talk about black men having a large penis has a very ugly history. So to answer the question yes black men historically have larger than average penises. But the reason why is part of one of the most horrible times of American history. Now as attitudes towards mixed race families eased and bloodlines started mixing the averages are closer and statistically it's probably a moot point in 2018.

By the way that mixing goes both ways. Light skin mixed race blacks would sometimes live as white people to have an easier life. Black people readily admit that a lighter skin color or eyes and a straighter hair texture comes from a Caucasian heritage. Caucasians on the other hand don't admit that they might have curly hair or a naturally darker skin tone from black ancestors. So a big dick white man might owe that to a black great, great, grandparent. Just saying.

This is a botched history lesson because black bodies were objectified in Africa by invaders long before slavery was even established in the Americas, but I can tell that you are also black so I’ll let you slide.

 

[CURVEDANDTHICKK]

This is a botched history lesson because black bodies were objectified in Africa by invaders long before slavery was even established in the Americas, but I can tell that you are also black so I’ll let you slide.

I think you missed the point of what I wrote. I was not speaking specifically on the objectification of black bodies, which as you point out has been going on for centuries. I was pointing out it was the white slave owners who falsely believed that larger genitals in male slaves was a indication of masculinity and fertility and chose those males to purchase and breed. Consequently this form of selective breeding created the larger penis in black men.

 

[LilJock]

Back in the days of slavery slave owners used to sell their slaves just like farmers do cattle because slaves legally were property just like animals. Of course the strongest slaves were the most valuable. And so just like cattle slave owners used to breed their strongest male slaves and sell the children for profit. Sadly this breeding usually started at young age just as the boy and girl were able to reproduce because the life span of a slave was not long. If the they didn't willingly have sex they would take the boy tie him up and sexually stimulate him for a period of time then force him to rape a female slave in order to be able to ejaculate and get relief.

The belief back then was that the larger a male's genitals were the more fertile he was and was a sign of strength. So the biggest slaves with the largest genitals were used like stud horses. It doesn't take a biology class to explain what the result would be as this practice continued through generations. Obviously the big dick slaves weren't the only ones having babies but selectively allowing the males with the biggest dicks to have the most babies is going to make a difference genetically.

The stereotype of black men having a larger than normal penis also dates back to slavery and for a very ugly reason. To prevent white women from sexually desiring a slave the white men would tell them that black men were sexually very aggressive and their large penises were more like an animal than a man. Basically they made it seem like black males were like an uncontrollable animal when they were sexually aroused and very dangerous. To make their point they would compare the large dark genitals of a horse with the large dark genitals of a slave and say that male slaves had sex just as violently as a horse. Want to guess where the hung like a horse term comes from. Now what's funny is it didn't seem to stop white men from having entire families with females slaves.

The slave trade also effected areas outside of the USA. Most of the Caribbean Islands and some areas of South America were ports where slaves brought from Africa were kept and sold so the same things were practiced there also.

So all of this talk about black men having a large penis has a very ugly history. So to answer the question yes black men historically have larger than average penises. But the reason why is part of one of the most horrible times of American history. Now as attitudes towards mixed race families eased and bloodlines started mixing the averages are closer and statistically it's probably a moot point in 2018.

By the way that mixing goes both ways. Light skin mixed race blacks would sometimes live as white people to have an easier life. Black people readily admit that a lighter skin color or eyes and a straighter hair texture comes from a Caucasian heritage. Caucasians on the other hand don't admit that they might have curly hair or a naturally darker skin tone from black ancestors. So a big dick white man might owe that to a black great, great, grandparent. Just saying.

Oh, dear. . .

The internet has a lot to answer for.

 

[TinyPrincess]

But notice who wound up banned. Troll privilege is real.

And troll #1 will never be banned as he generates too much traffic.

 

[326807]

Tiny Princess you have had black white and others..since you are the resident expert what is the biggest you'vesampled?and was it as satisfying as you had hoped?

 

[902369]

I think you missed the point of what I wrote. I was not speaking specifically on the objectification of black bodies, which as you point out has been going on for centuries. I was pointing out it was the white slave owners who falsely believed that larger genitals in male slaves was a indication of masculinity and fertility and chose those males to purchase and breed. Consequently this form of selective breeding created the larger penis in black men.

Your last sentence is incorrect because you would have to prove that it is only the male dna that can determine penis length and not the female dna, even when men carry BOTH male (Y chromosome) and female (X chromosome) genomes. This is why I think what you’re saying is a completely botched history lesson (lol) from one black person to another. I’ve actually read studies that say the opposite, that penis size comes from the female side of the family - the X chromosome so perhaps you should read up on that. The Y chromosome (from the male) determines the sex, the X chromosome (from the female) determines its size and shape.

And lastly, race does not determine penis length.

 

[TinyPrincess]

Tiny Princess you have had black white and others..since you are the resident expert what is the biggest you'vesampled?and was it as satisfying as you had hoped?

This thread should be solely on scientific proof - nothing else. Especially not the usual unsubstantiated racist BS.

I love big cocks and have been extremely lucky more than once. They have all been very satisfying. They have been a mix of colours. Even if I had been with 10, 100 or 1,000 times as many guys as I have been with, it would still be a personal experience in line with all the fictional locker room stories we see over and over. Not going down that line in this thread.

 

[soren10]

Hmm can this be considered as a " bigger works best " kind of statement. ? Because it feels like it, since you said that all have been satisfying. By default this means that all bad experiences happen with " normal " or less " fortunate " men. So in a way you admitted that bigger is better. This make you contradict yourself. See ??

 

[TinyPrincess]

As you bloody well know already, Soren, one of my best ever lovers was my first BF - and he was tiny.

I've told you plenty about former lovers, so don't make up stories out of what I said or didn't say just to fulfil your SPH needs.

 

[soren10]

You said it yourself all the big ones where very satisfying. Your words not mine. Which by default mean that every bad sexual experience you had was with guys that weren't big. Those are YOUR words not mine. As for the sph this is flat out BS. Because I pointed out that you contradict yourself in a post YOU made. You not I. So there is that. Glad that the truth is out in the open and it came from you after all these years.

 

[February12]

The answer is ... YES!

 

[SUCCUBUS.]

The 'showers' won't get smaller, obviously, but the smaller black guy standing between them may be a 'grower' who'll get as large or larger than them when erect.

maybe also the white guys are grower too

 

[TinyPrincess]

Sure he meant we can all cherry pick pictures and stories. That's the point of the thread - only scientific studies can prove if there's a difference in penile sizes.

So far only a correlation with height has been suggested. No correlation with race has been suggested.

This is not the same as saying there's no correlation. It could be that the data sample is still too little. This seem unlikely due to the datasets in existing studies but it's still a valid option for those hoping for a different result.

 

[CURVEDANDTHICKK]

Your last sentence is incorrect because you would have to prove that it is only the male dna that can determine penis length and not the female dna, even when men carry BOTH male (Y chromosome) and female (X chromosome) genomes. This is why I think what you’re saying is a completely botched history lesson (lol) from one black person to another. I’ve actually read studies that say the opposite, that penis size comes from the female side of the family - the X chromosome so perhaps you should read up on that. The Y chromosome (from the male) determines the sex, the X chromosome (from the female) determines its size and shape.

And lastly, race does not determine penis length.

Don't read things that don't exist. I never said that only males were conceived as a matter of fact I never mentioned the sex of the children. And you're right, if a baby girl has a dad with a large penis and somewhere down the line she has a son he could very well get his grandpa's big dick. And he could later have a son or daughter that can pass down that same trait and it can continue from generation to generation.

Simply put what I was saying is that if males with the biggest genitals are preferred for procreation it's obvious that that trait will likely be passed on to his offspring and he will have more offspring than the non preferred males. That is not a botched history lesson it's common sense LOL.

Also, as I said in my original post, in multicultural societies the differences in penis size of races is less significant than it was generations ago. But to gloss over the history of how this stereotype got started is foolish. I don't see you questioning any other part of my botched history lesson like how slaves were treated like cattle, how they were sold, how they were forced to have children and then had those children taken away and sold. Was any of that wrong?

 

[TinyPrincess]

The above made me wonder

• Is the any evidence of penile sizes running in families? Any data supporting this? It sounds fair but any evidence of this being other than random?
• Is there any evidence of penile sizes being less significant in multicultural societies? Firstly, it would require penile sizes being different, secondly, it would require that difference being reduced over the last couple of generations. As penile sizes isn't linked the race but is mildly correlated with height, your argument would require a multicultural society where height was very different among races a few generations ago but are less so now.

 

[902369]

Don't read things that don't exist. I never said that only males were conceived as a matter of fact I never mentioned the sex of the children. And you're right, if a baby girl has a dad with a large penis and somewhere down the line she has a son he could very well get his grandpa's big dick. And he could later have a son or daughter that can pass down that same trait and it can continue from generation to generation.

Simply put what I was saying is that if males with the biggest genitals are preferred for procreation it's obvious that that trait will likely be passed on to his offspring and he will have more offspring than the non preferred males. That is not a botched history lesson it's common sense LOL.

Also, as I said in my original post, in multicultural societies the differences in penis size of races is less significant than it was generations ago. But to gloss over the history of how this stereotype got started is foolish. I don't see you questioning any other part of my botched history lesson like how slaves were treated like cattle, how they were sold, how they were forced to have children and then had those children taken away and sold. Was any of that wrong?

The middle paragraph is wrong because you don't understand genetics and it's not common sense - it's ghetto hoodrat logic. Black people in the Americans were slaves for roughly 400 years, which I'm sure you are aware of. But before this 400 year period, they were living Africa for a much longer time. Since during slavery black people were being bred to produce more slaves and according to you this practice lead to a larger penis size among black males because hung black men were preferred for procreation, this doesn't conclude that black men have larger penises because selective breeding for over 400 years creates only a drop of difference in a long line of genes. Basically, if you practice selective breeding for 400 years this doesn't effect much a person who is carrying genes that cover 1,000+ years. Do you get what I'm saying? Selective breeding doesn't determine penis size. It honestly doesn't determine most physical characteristics.

 

[902369]

The above made me wonder

• Is the any evidence of penile sizes running in families? Any data supporting this? It sounds fair but any evidence of this being other than random?
• Is there any evidence of penile sizes being less significant in multicultural societies? Firstly, it would require penile sizes being different, secondly, it would require that difference being reduced over the last couple of generations. As penile sizes isn't linked the race but is mildly correlated with height, your argument would require a multicultural society where height was very different among races a few generations ago but are less so now.

It's ghetto logic that he swears is the truth. Read my post above.