I do find this thread very interesting, lol. Lots of people on here claim facts but never actually provide any facts. So, in my spare time, I thought I’d compile some facts!
FACT 1. There has been no study comparing the ERECT penis length between males of different races to find differences in erect size among different races or ethnicities.
Source 1: No such study could be found.
FACT 2: The widely referred to study from the British Journal of Urology (a study of studies) only included ~400 Black men from Nigeria and Tanzania. A small number were also Asian, while the overwhelming majority of men were White, over 14,000 out of the ~15,000+ men measures. (Is that a fair distribution? No.
Black men accounted for 2.6% of the men studied while White men accounted for 93%)
Source 2: British Journal of Urology
FACT 3: The Nigerian study of 320 Black men measured flaccid length, not erect (also, not stretched, as I had previously said). Therefore, there is no valid comparison. Also, most of the men were below the age of 23; the youngest being 17: “Their ages range from 17 to 23 years.” The study states: “The
size of the genitalia increases with the increase in age in younger year groups. The
adult stages of genitalia development are reached at the age of 21 years in 89.0% of the individuals. (Therefore, most of the men who participated hadn’t even developed completely, rendering this study useless in terms of measurement between races in adult males.)
Source 3: M L Ajmani et al. Anthropol Anz. 1985 Jun.
FACT4: The Tanzania study included men from the ages of 10 (yes, 10) to age 47: “In 253 Tanzanian males 10 to 47 years old” Also they write, “As expected,
given the variability of puberty, measurements in younger males varied significantly.” (Now, would a 10-20 year old male have finished developing enough to have his penis measured? These results are inconclusive to the size of adult males (18+, or 21+, taking full development into consideration).
Source 4: Kristin Chrouser et al. J Urol. 2013 Aug.
FACT 5: The BJI study explicitly states this about race: “
It is not possible from the present meta‐analysis to draw any conclusions about any differences in penile size across different races. Lynn suggest that penis length and girth are greatest in Negroids (sub‐Saharan Africans), intermediate in Caucasoids (Europeans, South Asians and North African), and smallest in Mongoloids (East Asians), but this is based upon studies that did not meet our present inclusion and exclusion criteria.” and “
The question of racial variability can only be resolved by the measurements with large enough population being made by practitioners following the same method with other variables that may influence penis size.” Finally, “
The greatest proportion of participants were Caucasian and Middle Eastern men. Therefore, it is not possible from the present meta‐analysis to draw any conclusions about any differences in penile size across different cultures.” (Also, no indication of race is the US, French, etc. study)
Source 5: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010
No opinions were created here. These are facts. There is no study comparing sizes based on race. So for all who keep referring to this study, READ IT FIRST! That’s all I have. Lol. No one can argue this. Black men were not tepee in this study, white men were. Numbers don’t lie. Hope this helps!