yes
and no
but then yes
but then no
how bout this, anytime you wanna group people by some arbitrary line in the sand, the closest you'll come to finding any ultimate truth is that YOU'LL be the one who is wrong
and interesting thoughts on your terminology, "blacks" versus "caucasians" and then having an issue apparently with the specific term "african-american" seeing as 'black' is a color, caucasian is a race and african-american is a sociological term. if its a 'versus' type question why wouldn't it be 'blacks' versus 'whites', (raising the questions where's yellow, red and the rest); or 'caucasian' versus 'negro', (again, where are the asiatics, american indians and others) and so on and so on and so on. again, all going back to the idea that when you decide to draw random arbitrary lines in the sand for grouping you more often than not end up with erroneous or useless data and resultant conclusions.
as for life in hawaii, i live there (here) and seems no different to me than where i came from in whitebread redneck land where i can go to 'the wrong' area and get jumped by someone, or living in new orleans go to the wrong area and get jumped by someone, or living in the caribbean, go to the wrong area and get jumped by someone, or living in a diverse cosmopolitan metropolis, go to the wrong area and get jumped by someone. human beings are territorial, human beings all feel they've been fucked over by some other randomly selected sub-group of human beings, human beings all to some degree have a RIGHT to feel this way as if you actually look at their story with an open mind they all HAVE been fucked over by other groups. i think you'll be disappointed though (and wrong) to try to engage in some hunt to find out WHO in all these randomly subjectively created sub-groups we dream up is the MOST racist, or MORE racist than others. what a waste of time.