Are Men Becoming Endangered?

2

2322

Guest
Yet more evidence pthalates, toxic pollutants, and other environmental estrogens are quietly causing the doom of humans:

Are males becoming an endangered species?

That's the question scientists and researchers have been pondering since alarming trends in male fertility rates, birth defects and disorders began emerging around the world.

More and more boys are being born with genital defects and are suffering from learning disabilities, autism and Tourette's syndrome, among other disorders.

Male infertility rates are on the rise and the quality of an average man's sperm is declining, according to some studies.

But perhaps the most disconcerting of all trends is the growing gender imbalance in many parts of heavily industrialized nations, where the births of baby boys have been declining for many years.

What many scientists are calling the most important -- and least publicized -- issue surrounding the future of the human race will be highlighted in a CBC documentary that features two Windsor researchers who've studied the phenomenon.

Titled The Disappearing Male and premiering tonight at 9 on CBC-TV, the documentary includes interviews with Jim Brophy and Margaret Keith, adjunct sociology professors at the University of Windsor.

They have been studying the decline in the birth of male children in the Aamjiwnaang First Nation community located next to the infamous Chemical Valley, Canada's largest concentration of petrochemical plants, near Sarnia.

A paper co-authored by Keith and published three years ago in the U.S. journal Environmental Health Perspectives suggests that exposure to various chemicals produced by industrial plants surrounding the Aamjiwnaang reserve land may be skewing the community's sex ratio.

The researchers looked at the community's birth records since 1984 and saw "a dramatic drop in the number of boys being born in the last 10 years, particularly in the five-year period between 1998 and 2003," Brophy said.

Of 132 Aamjiwnaang babies born between 1999 and 2003, only 46 were boys. Typically, about 105 boys are born for every 100 girls in Canada.

High miscarriage rates and a unusually high number of children suffering from asthma were also noted by researchers.

Although the link between pollutants and human reproduction has not been firmly established, there is growing evidence that the birth sex ratio can be altered by exposure to certain chemicals, such as dioxin, PCBs and pesticides. Brophy said studies done in the United States, Japan and Europe seem to support the theory that the so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals have a particular effect on males.

Some of these chemicals are found in commonly used products such as baby bottles and cosmetics. They can also cause miscarriages and a "whole host" of disorders in a male child, Brophy said.

Brophy said soil and water contamination in and around the Aamjiwnaang reserve had been documented before, including in a University of Windsor study that found high levels of PCBs, lead, mercury and various chemicals in the area in the late 1990s. Accidental chemical spills in the area have not been uncommon.

But it wasn't until the Aamjiwnaang birth ratio study was published that the global science community really took notice.

"It triggered ... calls from scientists and researchers from around the world who had been looking at this issue in Europe and the United States," Brophy said. "Aamjiwnaang became almost the poster child."

While Brophy has not seen The Disappearing Male documentary yet, he believes the story of the Aamjiwnaang community will be "the focal point."

He said the documentary also includes interviews with "some of the foremost experts in the world" on environmental effects on reproductive health.

Brophy and Keith have also studied other occupational and environmental exposures to pollutants, including the link between breast cancer and certain types of jobs in the Windsor-Essex region. -The Windsor Star
One of the birth defects, decreased ano-genital distance in males, has been observed around the world. But I also wonder if there just simply aren't more gay men because of this as well? Could environmental pollution be skewing male sexual preference as well? What if there really are more gays per capita than there used to be because of these pollutants?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1BiGG1

Sexy Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
123
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Doom? No, just a “correction” in the population explosion the world will not be able to feed soon anyway. :shhh:
 

Principessa

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Posts
18,660
Media
0
Likes
141
Points
193
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Yet more evidence pthalates, toxic pollutants, and other environmental estrogens are quietly causing the doom of humans:

One of the birth defects, decreased ano-genital distance in males, has been observed around the world. But I also wonder if there just simply aren't more gay men because of this as well? Could environmental pollution be skewing male sexual preference as well? What if there really are more gays per capita than there used to be because of these pollutants?
Interesting article. The only thing it proves is that boy sperm are weaker than girl sperm. I'm not being catty. A reproductive endocrinologist told a friend of mine that male sperm swim faster than female sperm. Female sperm however are stronger. So if you want a boy baby lay on your back during sex and if you want a girl baby the cowgirl position is best. I laughed, I thought it was B.S. However, I have since mentioned it to 3 women trying to conceive and they all swear they tried it and got what they were aiming for when the baby arrived. :confused:

Back to the article. I do believe chemical pollution is affecting infants of both sexes adversely in many ways: asthma, cystic fibrosis, autism, cleft palates, various respiratory ailments, the list is endless. Yet I am really uncomfortable with the idea that an external and controllable source creates gay men. Great if we get rid of air pollution and unnecssary toxins; not great if suddenly we have no more gays.
 

wispandex_bulge

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Posts
371
Media
1
Likes
15
Points
238
Location
Wisconsin
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
This is a slippery slope. If you argue that pollution can "cause" homosexuality, then you liken it to a disease. I would never categorize homosexuality as a disease. However, I do beleive it is an abnormality as it is technically inhibitory to the continuation of the species and is not yet proven to be directly inheritable (Most gay parents have straight biological children-so I've heard). Bringing pollutants into the mix of explanations though might be a way to help people understand why people are different in general and help them understand how someone might acquire homosexual interest through natural development.

I personally think that we will never find a gay gene. The mind and personal preference are far too complex to me mitigated by a single gene. Think of it as a dice game. Imagine that each die represents a gene's possible types. Lets keep this simple at two dice. Lets assume that for a child to be gay, the dice have to roll a 1&6 combo. The sum of 7 isnt important, but the combination of 1 and 6 is. Under pristine conditions the body will take the entire genetic code into "consideration" and transcribe the appropriate portions of those two genes, creating proteins, which in-turn define intra-cellular interactions, which can help "wire" the brain in a certain way, which can lead to homosexual interests.

This time lets take a child who got a 3 and 6 roll, but lets assume the child has been exposed to a significant amount of some pollutant. This time the body may not transcribe the appropriate portions of the genes if the pollutant affects the transcription machinery or alters the recognition of the gene by the machinery. Then, even if it trinscribest the gene appropriately, the pollutant coudl affect the transport and or placement of the created proteins, yielding them ineffective. Then again, even if the proteins make it where they are supposed to go in good condition, the pollutant may interfere with the intracellular communication, again rendering the proteins less effective.

Here is where you need to make the biggest jump: This person who has 3-6 genetics may develop a 1-6 body because the pollutant interfered with the natural genetic funtion of that person's cells. It is also conceivable that a 3-6 person who is exposed to this pollutant might develop a 4-6 body, but the point is that if pollutants can "fool" the system by making any other dice roll seem like the 1-6 combination, then the cells will interact similarly to the way they would for someone who actually has that 1-6 combination.

So, is homosexuality genetic? It could be, even without a definitive "gay gene".
Is homosexuality environmental? It could be, as explained above.
Is homosexuality social nuture? Not directly, but I could see a rationale where set of social events or circumstances causes hormonal or other chemical changes during development that mimic the pollutants as described above.
 

erratic

Loved Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Posts
4,289
Media
0
Likes
509
Points
333
Sexuality
No Response
I saw the documentary. Fantastic. Said nothing about homosexuality.

To precis, male sexual development in the uterus is being stunted because of chemicals like pesticides, BPA and phthalates. Male children are increasingly being miscarried because of the same chemicals. Sperm counts are down and the remaining sperm are of poorer quality.

Since there is no firm understanding about the genesis of homo- or heterosexuality it's only speculation to consider the feminizing effects of estrogenergic petrochemicals as a possible cause or contributor. If that were the case, one would expect a higher rate of penile birth defects among homosexual men. I don't know of any research on that, though I suspect there are more than a few people on this site who can tell us. Haha.
 

curious n str8

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Posts
913
Media
6
Likes
8
Points
163
Age
33
Location
The big AK
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Yet more evidence pthalates, toxic pollutants, and other environmental estrogens are quietly causing the doom of humans:

One of the birth defects, decreased ano-genital distance in males, has been observed around the world. But I also wonder if there just simply aren't more gay men because of this as well? Could environmental pollution be skewing male sexual preference as well? What if there really are more gays per capita than there used to be because of these pollutants?
I have a theory about birth control being a cause of homosexuality. Seems to be that there are more gay people than ever before. :dunno: any input? no pun intended.

Doom? No, just a “correction” in the population explosion the world will not be able to feed soon anyway. :shhh:
Let's not forget global warming/ cooling... :33:
 

marleyisalegend

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Posts
6,126
Media
1
Likes
620
Points
333
Age
38
Location
charlotte
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I rescind this argument...

What's the point of a species reproducing if it can't take care of it's young?

If we tell elephants and raccoons that they're allowed to mate carelessly with no regard to survival then I'm sure they'll catch up and surpass us. More sex!

Anywho, back to the original question

Q: Are Men Becoming Endangered?

Not fast enough.
 

Phil Ayesho

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Posts
6,189
Media
0
Likes
2,793
Points
333
Location
San Diego
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
The female population does not need that many males to keep things going. One male an inseminate a LOT of females.


As to homosexuality... there is no evidence that the incidence of homosexuality is increasing... and, the presence of homosexual behavior in ALL social mammal species argues that it is perfectly normal and its prevalence part of the evolved balance of mammalian sexual behavior.

The reason it persists seems to be because it is related to a variable condition within the mother's womb- therefore, its NOT genetically caused, but a developmental variation that seems tied to the number of offspring the female has borne.

Thus- reproductive SUCCESS in the female is related to homosexual behavior in their male children... and because of this linkage, Homosexuality can not be selected out.



As to feminization from pollutants... trust me... as the evidence for this solidifies, the result will be SERIOUS attention paid to SOLVING the problem...

Its interesting, but hardly the harbinger of doom to humanity.
 

Principessa

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Posts
18,660
Media
0
Likes
141
Points
193
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
The female population does not need that many males to keep things going. One male an inseminate a LOT of females.
Oh for God's sake Phil, we aren't chickens or cows! :irked:
As to homosexuality... there is no evidence that the incidence of homosexuality is increasing... and, the presence of homosexual behavior in ALL social mammal species argues that it is perfectly normal and its prevalence part of the evolved balance of mammalian sexual behavior.

The reason it persists seems to be because it is related to a variable condition within the mother's womb- therefore, its NOT genetically caused,
but a developmental variation that seems tied to the number of offspring the female has borne.
BUZZ! :tongue: Wrong answer. :biggrin1: If that were true then either there would be no gay only children or only men with mutiple siblings would be gay.

Thus- reproductive SUCCESS in the female is related to homosexual behavior in their male children... and because of this linkage, Homosexuality can not be selected out.

:wtf1:


As to feminization from pollutants... trust me... as the evidence for this solidifies, the result will be SERIOUS attention paid to SOLVING the problem...Its interesting, but hardly the harbinger of doom to humanity.
:lame: