Are these photoshopped?

[longbeachguy]

If so, how can I tell, I don't know what to look for. Or if this is in fact real (highly unlikely) and belongs to some pron star, please tell me who.

The idiot using these pix is claiming a ridiculous 16", so we at least know that he's a liar.

http://c.wouldyouhitthis.com/member_files/2004/11/08/139801/pics/08552850011513315066937.jpg

http://a.wouldyouhitthis.com/member_files/2004/11/08/139801/pics/06994280011347423917442.jpg

 

[schllong]

photoshopped!!

 

[CBS1]

second photo you can see just after the scar from being circumcise you can see the curve of the cock head the original cock head and he is uncircumcised

 

[b.c.]

DUH!! :biggrin1:

(sorry...not meaning to poke fun or ridicule...couldn't resist...WAY photoshopped, dude...lol)

 

[italbigbro]

:011: Uhhh..... Yes They are....:hitwithrock:

 

[longbeachguy]

second photo you can see just after the scar from being circumcise you can see the curve of the cock head the original cock head and he is uncircumcised

I didn't quite understand, can you be more specific? Thanks for your patience and help so far!

 

[Baseballfan155]

Umm...yes! Of course they are! Just take a look at it. Does it look real to you?

 

[EddieAztek]

Photoshopping okay, if you honest. There's birthmarks and distinguished features on my body I don't want shooting around online. :lol: If you checkout my ass picture, look at my lower back just over my ass, you can see the tat I shopped out. I been called on that here twice now, and I didn't deny it.

 

[nakedwally]

yes they are photoshopped

 

[DaveyR]

Absolutely

 

[xxncxx]

I didn't quite understand, can you be more specific? Thanks for your patience and help so far!

On the second one there is an uncircumcized, "ghost" penis that the person clearly didn't remove well enough. If you look carefully you can see it.

 

[Master Blaster]

without a doubt

 

[snoozan]

Yes.

 

[Bossman1]

Yes like so many other penises on this site

 

[Snakebyte]

pretty bad fakes anyway
You can do way better with Photoshop

 

[B_ScaredLittleBoy]

For one, it looks like a cut-out. It doesn't have the look of something real. Secondly, and in the second pic, you can see the exact same line appear twice...which means its been duplicated.

 

[DonaldDoe]

Get an erection and look at your cock, now look at those pictures. Hilariously bad.

 

[arliss]

If so, how can I tell, I don't know what to look for. Or if this is in fact real (highly unlikely) and belongs to some pron star, please tell me who.

The idiot using these pix is claiming a ridiculous 16", so we at least know that he's a liar.

http://c.wouldyouhitthis.com/member_files/2004/11/08/139801/pics/08552850011513315066937.jpg

http://a.wouldyouhitthis.com/member_files/2004/11/08/139801/pics/06994280011347423917442.jpg

dude you had to ask? come on ...some things are fairly obvious............

 

[eric19831]

Fake, Fake, Fake!!!

 

[D_e5c6u]

I agree, photoshopped, but not badly. If you compare the markings on one shot to the other they don't add up. Let's see a shot laying on some wrinkled cloth (the interaction is hard to fake well) and in high resolution to prove this claim?