Arianna for Gov

1

13788

Guest
Longhornjok: Well, since I started this thread, I felt it only appropriate that I (probably) close it. :D

With the release of Arianna's tax returns showing she paid a total of $770 in federal income tax for the past 2 years COMBINED (and no CA state tax, either), I think her candidacy can pretty much be written off. I respect her, and her CPA's, right to use legal writeoffs to lessen her tax burden, but I think she's whistling in the wind if she thinks voters are going to buy her explanation that she is really just "a working mom" as she sits in her $7 million home in Beverly Hills.

I would say her candidacy is now officially D-O-A.

(A chastened, if somewhat more cynical, Longhornjok)
 
1

13788

Guest
awellhungboi: You sound like Jimmy Stewart when he found out that Claude Rains was on the take in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

Hmm . . . "Longhornjok goes to Sacramento?"

Sounds like a '70's porn flick.
 
1

13788

Guest
Longhornjok: Yeah, I know, what's next - Longhornjok learns the moon ain't made of green cheese? :D
 

MisterMark

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
2,021
Media
10
Likes
126
Points
383
Location
Palm Springs, CA
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I agree with Longhornjok. As much as I like Arianna and would probably enjoy sitting next to her on a long plane ride, the $771 tax bill just looks bad for a woman who is a millionaire many times over. I know she had losses, but geez...how many of us here making less than $50,000/year paid a LOT more than $771?!
 
1

13788

Guest
7x6andchg: Longhorn -

I won't say ITYS....

but..celebrities for Governor does tend to bring this sort of thing out....

7x6&C
 
1

13788

Guest
aj2181: Well I'm against the recall, (I know big surprise ;D).

It looks more and more like a freak show out there everyday.