Because most men would find that woman to be less attractive. Hardly a double standard at all.
Do you understand what a double standard is? The fact that men are attracted to smooth pits on a woman yet do not shave themselves is WHY it is a double standard!
Do you understand what a double standard is? The fact that men are attracted to smooth pits on a woman yet do not shave themselves is WHY it is a double standard!
Do you understand what a double standard is? The fact that men are attracted to smooth pits on a woman yet do not shave themselves is WHY it is a double standard!
That's not a double standard. Under your logic, women shouldn't grow their hair long, women should never shave the hair above their lips and below their nose, women shouldn't wear makeup, etc, because that's all just a "nasty double standard" because men don't have to do those things.
A double standard only occurs when something is unjustified or morally unfair. Women shaving their arm pits in an attempt to be more desirable to males is a perfect justification for why it is acceptable for women to shave their pits. There is nothing unfair about this and therefore this is not a double standard let alone "a nasty double standard" as the original poster described.
That's not a double standard. Under your logic, women shouldn't grow their hair long, women should never shave the hair above their lips and below their nose, women shouldn't wear makeup, etc, because that's all just a "nasty double standard" because men don't have to do those things.
A double standard only occurs when something is unjustified or morally unfair. Women shaving their arm pits in an attempt to be more desirable to males is a perfect justification for why it is acceptable for women to shave their pits. There is nothing unfair about this and therefore this is not a double standard let alone "a nasty double standard" as the original poster described.
double standard
noun
1. any code or set of principles containing different provisions for one group of people than for another, especially an unwritten code of sexual behavior permitting men more freedom than women. Compare single standard ( def. 1 )
2. Economics . bimetallism.
Could likely make a compelling argument either way. Men expect something that they don't practice themselves.
Frankly, I never had a problem with women and their hairy armpits...in fact I had a terrible crush on a girl in 9th grade who had hairy armpits...I cant tell you how many times I jerked off thinking about her...
Read the first line- Double standard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThose are all double standards. Except for growing hair long - that's a double standard for men. (As in women can have any length hair and men are expected to keep it short for the most part). Being attractive to the oppostive sex is a pretty nebulous justification for this double standard to exist - yet it does.
Just because most of us North American women have bought into this double standard doesn't make it less of one. I certainly am complicit in keeping this one alive by shaving, plucking, colouring and putting on makeup. I am also aware that I am engaging in a double standard.
If it's that important to you, feel free to start your own thread.Dude, this is a woman's issue thread. If you want to debate the meaning of double standard, we can discuss it elsewhere.
Read the first line- Double standard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"A double standard is the unjust application of different sets of principles for similar situations."
Being attractive to the opposite sex is hardly a "nebulous" justification. Why don't you try to let all your body hair grow out and don't wear any makeup and see the results of what kind of males (if any males) you attract.
If it's that important to you, feel free to start your own thread.
It's natural. I have NO idea why NA standards have women mowing the lawn (other than to look like the forbidden prepubescents) trimmed, I can understand.
Wasn't pit hair in place to retain pheromones?