The woman in question posted a picture of an "A" the size of a pea and she claimed that Armie Hammer carved his initial into her and licked the blood.
I've said this before in an earlier post: the turning point for me was a) when it leaked that Hammer's estranged wife, who he was still married to when these affairs were happening, was connected with the stories that were being leaked to the press and b) when Gloria Allred, who loves being in front of a camera and who loves leaking to the press, dropped these women as clients.
Anytime the press asks Allred about the statements made by these women, she refuses to comment citing attorney-client privilege. I don't think I've ever known Allred to use privilege to avoid answering a question from the press.
Allred did give a formal statement to the Los Angeles Times:
Allred figured out that these clients were colluding with Hammer's wife, Elizabeth Chambers, and Allred wasn't able to verify enough of the claims made by these women. Allred doesn't like to lose cases, so once she figures out that she's not being told the truth, she will drop the client to avoid damage to her own reputation as a feminist attorney.
I wouldn't dismiss this as Armie Hammer being "innocent"- it appears that both Chambers and Hammer had an open marriage and were both involved in affairs outside their marriage. This looks more and more like two people involved in an ugly divorce and ugly custody battle and they're trying their case in the press. All of these people were adults and it appears all of them were consenting adults doing what consenting adults do. Why it's anyone else's business is a mystery to me.
