Found this article on the internet:
Does Testosterone Drive Success in Men? Not So Much
There's been a long-running debate about penis size and success. For instance, a study a few years ago of college athletes in the UK for a doctoral thesis suggested that penis size influenced an athlete's standing among his teammates.
I never felt there was any correlation, at least not in my case. I'm "hung like a chipmunk" and yet been very successful in life and business (and love!). I always attributed that to my looks and athletic ability. However, I've heard many ascribe similar success to big balls, so maybe there is some correlation there because I do have big balls.
But this article suggests that that may not be the case, that it may be a feedback loop -- that the socioeconomic success of one's parents leads to big testicles and thus the success of one's children.
What do you think?
PS. I realize I've substituted big testicles for testosterone, but thought it spiced things up a bit!
Does Testosterone Drive Success in Men? Not So Much
There's been a long-running debate about penis size and success. For instance, a study a few years ago of college athletes in the UK for a doctoral thesis suggested that penis size influenced an athlete's standing among his teammates.
I never felt there was any correlation, at least not in my case. I'm "hung like a chipmunk" and yet been very successful in life and business (and love!). I always attributed that to my looks and athletic ability. However, I've heard many ascribe similar success to big balls, so maybe there is some correlation there because I do have big balls.
But this article suggests that that may not be the case, that it may be a feedback loop -- that the socioeconomic success of one's parents leads to big testicles and thus the success of one's children.
What do you think?
PS. I realize I've substituted big testicles for testosterone, but thought it spiced things up a bit!
Last edited: