dong20
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Posts
- 6,058
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 28
- Points
- 183
- Location
- The grey country
- Sexuality
- No Response
Without wishing to throw my mojo down on this thread it's a shame that her fellow contestants seemed to use her as a source of amusement rather than an opportunity to well, act like humans and show that a 'disability' isn't in itself a bar to success, or even common decency.
Such programmes usually seem to bring out the very worst in people. Of course that's the intent after all, it's good TV. It's just a shame it seemed to be at the expense of someone who clearly had more courage and was more deserving of respect than the rest of them put together.
On that theme, it's indicative of the cynical and unpleasant nature of such 'reality' TV today (if we are to believe Ms Kuzmich that she wasn't teased much) that the positive interactions with her fellow contestants were edited out and the negatives edited in. If true, the programme makers are feckless charlatans and should hang their heads.
This is based on the post alone. I've seen the programme once or twice as I've scanned the channels - it makes me want to whack their spiteful empty little heads with a wet fish or a 2 by 4, whichever falls to hand first.
That said, to end on an upbeat note; it's good she did well before being eliminated. Let's hope that despite the best efforts of a media seemingly focussed on negativity the profile raising leads to a lasting change in peoples attitudes about this and similar conditions.
Such programmes usually seem to bring out the very worst in people. Of course that's the intent after all, it's good TV. It's just a shame it seemed to be at the expense of someone who clearly had more courage and was more deserving of respect than the rest of them put together.
On that theme, it's indicative of the cynical and unpleasant nature of such 'reality' TV today (if we are to believe Ms Kuzmich that she wasn't teased much) that the positive interactions with her fellow contestants were edited out and the negatives edited in. If true, the programme makers are feckless charlatans and should hang their heads.
This is based on the post alone. I've seen the programme once or twice as I've scanned the channels - it makes me want to whack their spiteful empty little heads with a wet fish or a 2 by 4, whichever falls to hand first.
That said, to end on an upbeat note; it's good she did well before being eliminated. Let's hope that despite the best efforts of a media seemingly focussed on negativity the profile raising leads to a lasting change in peoples attitudes about this and similar conditions.