Assad is a cunt.

Cylon No1

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Posts
303
Media
21
Likes
308
Points
363
Location
South Africa
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
The UN is as much use as a cut off foreskin.Send in bomber and lets get rid of the fucker.Fuck the UN and all their meetings and shit like that.Bloody waste of space.China and Russia should also get a nuck each.
 
7

798686

Guest
We have regime change if we wish every four or five years. Self determination, that is what people want.

Those Tanks look very Russian to me.
I love the way Medvedev says 'it's time for the world to act to prevent a civil war'.

Eh? The war's almost bloody over, and he's only saying this cos Assad is losing. :mad: Arsehole.

Also - I see Kim Jong (or whatever) has a new wife? Another one for the Despots WAGS team, must introduce her to 'Western-acting' Asma. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cruztbone

Experimental Member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Posts
1,284
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
258
Age
70
Location
Capitola CA USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
you are just NOW figuring out Assad is evil? what took you so long? and Turkey is providing the rebels in Syria with their weapons, along with Qatar and Saudi Arabia. all three nations hate Assad and want him removed from power. the coverage from CNN.com - Breaking News, U.S., World, Weather, Entertainment & Video News is showing that the rebels are locking up the Syrian army troops in empty schoolhouse rooms, and some revenge killing is taking place in large areas of Syria outside of the capital . it is just a matter of time before Assad goes to the big Cunt in the sky.
 

MarkLondon

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Posts
1,911
Media
21
Likes
97
Points
193
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I have no idea what the western arabists (good old Lawrence, UK foreign office, US department of state, French interests) are up to now. But I do know it can lead to no good. They thought then (post 1918) that having brought down the Ottoman Empire they could rule the middle east. The fools.
 
7

798686

Guest
I think in this case it has more to do with wanting to stop Assad's tyranny.
 
1

185248

Guest
Well, in that part of the world that's what it takes. In a country of two or three political parties. Times are easy. In a country of 40 or 50 factions or fundamental groups, you are bound to end up a little bit bent or cunt like.

I do not agree one bit with the goings on at all. I am just glad I do not live there, and thank whatever I was not chosen to be born there. Well, not this time around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1

185248

Guest
Ever been on a building site.... Where the carpenters do not get on with the brickies who do not get on with the sparkies who do not get on with the plumbers who do not get on with the roofers, who do not get on with the dry wallers, who do not get on with the concretors... and everyone does not get on with the architect who does not get on with the engineer who does not get on with the council who does not get on with the government who is the politician who is trying to do what the majority of the people want because it's a government project?

Deep breath. Ahhh fuckit....The primary builder, just blow em all up :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

vince

Legendary Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Posts
8,271
Media
1
Likes
1,674
Points
333
Location
Canada
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
yes he can be a cunt, as we see right now... but the question is, what comes after him
Is it possible for what comes after to be any worse?

This same comment has been made about every attempt to overthrow a cunt in the past thirty years and so far, none of the people that have taken over have been any worse. In the majority of countries, there's been a big improvement. The same question was asked about what would come after Qaddafi, Mubarak and even Pol Pot for heavens sake!
 

Perados

Superior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Posts
11,002
Media
9
Likes
2,505
Points
333
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Is it possible for what comes after to be any worse?

This same comment has been made about every attempt to overthrow a cunt in the past thirty years and so far, none of the people that have taken over have been any worse. In the majority of countries, there's been a big improvement. The same question was asked about what would come after Qaddafi, Mubarak and even Pol Pot for heavens sake!
After lenin was stalin... Defenetly no improvment
After the iranian shaar came the mulla.
Or just think about afrika doring the tast 50 years.

Do you really believe that the people of iraq are in a better situation now, as they were in 2002?

Who is fighting against assad? - forces supported by saudi-arabia and al-qaida. And dont tell me they just support them cause the want to create a democracy - it was saudi-arabia that sends tanks to bahrain, to stop the demonstrations.

With assad around 30% of the population had to suffer. On the other hand his gov supported another 30%, mainly minorities.
should the political power switch, the same would with the support. - the minorities would have to suffer and who suffered befor will get supported.

At the end we can say, nothing mutch will change for the people and the whole middle east will become more instable.
Thats why im not really happy about what happens in syria. - its something total different to egypt or lybia
 
Last edited:

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,677
Media
0
Likes
2,811
Points
333
Location
Greece
After lenin was stalin... Defenetly no improvment
After the iranian shaar came the mulla.
Or just think about afrika doring the tast 50 years.

Do you really believe that the people of iraq are in a better situation now, as they were in 2002?

Who is fighting against assad? - forces supported by saudi-arabia and al-qaida. And dont tell me they just support them cause the want to create a democracy - it was saudi-arabia that sends tanks to bahrain, to stop the demonstrations.

With assad around 30% of the population had to suffer. On the other hand his gov supported another 30%, mainly minorities.
should the political power switch, the same would with the support. - the minorities would have to suffer and who suffered befor will get supported.

At the end we can say, nothing mutch will change for the people and the whole middle east will become more instable.
Thats why im not really happy about what happens in syria. - its something total different to egypt or lybia

What is important, and perhaps it is over the horizon, is that change will happen. Mussolini, Assad, it will be you lying in blood and shit. Think on it.

You want to live by the sword.... etc etc
 
Last edited: