Is it possible for what comes after to be any worse?
This same comment has been made about every attempt to overthrow a cunt in the past thirty years and so far, none of the people that have taken over have been any worse. In the majority of countries, there's been a big improvement. The same question was asked about what would come after Qaddafi, Mubarak and even Pol Pot for heavens sake!
After lenin was stalin... Defenetly no improvment
After the iranian shaar came the mulla.
Or just think about afrika doring the tast 50 years.
Do you really believe that the people of iraq are in a better situation now, as they were in 2002?
Who is fighting against assad? - forces supported by saudi-arabia and al-qaida. And dont tell me they just support them cause the want to create a democracy - it was saudi-arabia that sends tanks to bahrain, to stop the demonstrations.
With assad around 30% of the population had to suffer. On the other hand his gov supported another 30%, mainly minorities.
should the political power switch, the same would with the support. - the minorities would have to suffer and who suffered befor will get supported.
At the end we can say, nothing mutch will change for the people and the whole middle east will become more instable.
Thats why im not really happy about what happens in syria. - its something total different to egypt or lybia