- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 2,827
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 295
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Ontario (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
"The first amendment serves not only the needs of the polity but also those of the human spirit — a spirit that demands self expression."
High school art eacher Tamara Hoover got fired by the Austin Independent School District in Austin Texas this past June, because her partner (a professional photographer) had posted photos on flickr.com which included nudes of Tamara, as well as images of their domestic life (they are a lesbian couple), and a spiteful colleague on the same faculty had her art students view the pics on a classroom computer. Shit hit the fan and the outcome was that Tamara got suspended, a hearing was held, and she was fired.
Austin is generally considered a forward thinking oasis in Texas, an attractive home to gays, artists, academics and more of "those types... of ughn-American values" than many other locales.
The images were not pornographic but portrayed nudity. Her titties were visible. They've been taken down. The photographer Celesta Danger is an artist and was the originating poster, not Tamara.
One interesting statement I read was that by this argument, Georgia O'Keefe, acknowleged as one of America's greatest artists, (hypothetically, were she living today) would be unable to teach art in the high school system, because she posed nude for her partner, the great American photographer Alfred Stieglitz.
Did Tamara deserve to get the can? Why?
Was there another agenda involved here?
How does this influence your own decisions on what is posted about you on the web?
http://www.myspace.com/mshoover
http://www.flickr.com/photos/celestadanger/
http://www.celestadanger.com
High school art eacher Tamara Hoover got fired by the Austin Independent School District in Austin Texas this past June, because her partner (a professional photographer) had posted photos on flickr.com which included nudes of Tamara, as well as images of their domestic life (they are a lesbian couple), and a spiteful colleague on the same faculty had her art students view the pics on a classroom computer. Shit hit the fan and the outcome was that Tamara got suspended, a hearing was held, and she was fired.
Austin is generally considered a forward thinking oasis in Texas, an attractive home to gays, artists, academics and more of "those types... of ughn-American values" than many other locales.
The images were not pornographic but portrayed nudity. Her titties were visible. They've been taken down. The photographer Celesta Danger is an artist and was the originating poster, not Tamara.
One interesting statement I read was that by this argument, Georgia O'Keefe, acknowleged as one of America's greatest artists, (hypothetically, were she living today) would be unable to teach art in the high school system, because she posed nude for her partner, the great American photographer Alfred Stieglitz.
Did Tamara deserve to get the can? Why?
Was there another agenda involved here?
How does this influence your own decisions on what is posted about you on the web?
http://www.myspace.com/mshoover
http://www.flickr.com/photos/celestadanger/
http://www.celestadanger.com