Austin Mahone

[TheCocoaCumSlut]

No I don't, I just read claims I was expecting more like a specific situation on how he has promised something and failed to deliver. Because I have a feeling people are just complaining about the lack of nudity which he, since the very beginning, stated will never do.

So I was looking for someone to share a situation where they were actually scammed/taken advantage which also seems so false given OF do follow through false claims when you purchase.

Oh, henni. I was his biggest defender on that element of things, but, he’s long since moved beyond that.

Back then, he’d said he’d never do nudity, and his posts didn’t explicitly promise any nudity either, but were merely suggestive, or sexy.

Now, he’s basically saying, in no uncertain terms, that he is naked, showing his dick, having an erection, promising you can see his dick or ass…and it’s all just lies. The captions of his messages have gone beyond being suggestive to downright lies.

 

[Aether12v]

Hopefully someone can share some clear insight thank you for replying still.

It's simple. The captions don't match the photographs. He claims to be showing something and then is not showing it in the images. The same goes for many "influencers" that have the same modus operandi.

 

[JoshCG]

Oh, henni. I was his biggest defender on that element of things, but, he’s long since moved beyond that.

Back then, he’d said he’d never do nudity, and his posts didn’t explicitly promise any nudity either, but were merely suggestive, or sexy.

Now, he’s basically saying, in no uncertain terms, that he is naked, showing his dick, having an erection, promising you can see his dick or ass…and it’s all just lies. The captions of his messages have gone beyond being suggestive to downright lies.

It's simple. The captions don't match the photographs. He claims to be showing something and then is not showing it in the images. The same goes for many "influencers" that have the same modus operandi.

Los entiendo totalmente pero desde una perspectiva legal general... El puede dar inuendos o demás pero si NO se retracta de manera oficial a su primer claim entonces esperar algo más y gastar dinero en eso es literalmente una tontería.

OF hacen tease siempre... No se vayan con la cuenta, el tiene que explicitamente contrariar su primer coment antes de esperar verlo desnudo. Negocios... Son oscuros pero no un scam unfortunately ‍

 

[TheCocoaCumSlut]

Los entiendo totalmente pero desde una perspectiva legal general... El puede dar inuendos o demás pero si NO se retracta de manera oficial a su primer claim entonces esperar algo más y gastar dinero en eso es literalmente una tontería.

OF hacen tease siempre... No se vayan con la cuenta, el tiene que explicitamente contrariar su primer coment antes de esperar verlo desnudo. Negocios... Son oscuros pero no un scam unfortunately ‍

The problem is that he’s not giving innuendos anymore. It’s not mere suggestions. He’s now actually claiming that the private messages contain nudity. Explicitly.

Legally, he’s moving beyond language that can be defended. He is now explicitly promising exact, direct, concrete things in his captions (nudity) that he is not providing.

Were it still implicit/suggested/implied, I would say, people wouldn’t have a stance, his first statement should still be considered, and his sexually-suggested captions were not an explicit promise of anything. However, now that is explicitly promising nudity, he is by-default contradicting his initial statement, AND failing to deliver his promise.

It’s gone full grift/scam at this point.

 

[JoshCG]

The problem is that he’s not giving innuendos anymore. It’s not mere suggestions. He’s now actually claiming that the private messages contain nudity. Explicitly.

Legally, he’s moving beyond language that can be defended. He is now explicitly promising exact, direct, concrete things in his captions (nudity) that he is not providing.

Were it still implicit/suggested/implied, I would say, people wouldn’t have a stance, his first statement should still be considered, and his sexually-suggested captions were not an explicit promise of anything. However, now that is explicitly promising nudity, he is by-default contradicting his initial statement, AND failing to deliver his promise.

It’s gone full grift/scam at this point.

That's bad. You can just file with OF and eventually they do take measures like banning that will hurt him

 

[Aether12v]

Los entiendo totalmente pero desde una perspectiva legal general... El puede dar inuendos o demás pero si NO se retracta de manera oficial a su primer claim entonces esperar algo más y gastar dinero en eso es literalmente una tontería.

OF hacen tease siempre... No se vayan con la cuenta, el tiene que explicitamente contrariar su primer coment antes de esperar verlo desnudo. Negocios... Son oscuros pero no un scam unfortunately ‍

Pues nunca dijo en su OnlyFans que no saldría desnudo en el contenido. Lo dijo en una entrevista, por lo tanto, eso no cuenta. Yo no le gasto dinero ya y ha pasado mucho tiempo desde que lo hice. También tené en cuenta que todo no viene a este sitio para aprender de su declaración.

Una marca no puede vender una caja de galletas y en realidad sólo hay una fotografía de una galleta. Él es un estafador y eso es. Pero todo el mundo puede hacer lo que quiera. Miraré el contenido y disfrutaré de él, pero no significa que no sea una estafa.

 

[Dokteki]

That's bad. You can just file with OF and eventually they do take measures like banning that will hurt him

That almost never works

 

[Matty9205]

This may be a stupid question but in his new tip menu he has the option of naked pictures for 65 dlls but pubes pic for 99 dlls, so what does that naked pictures look like??
btw i'm not planning on buying anything

 

[scottjames]

This may be a stupid question but in his new tip menu he has the option of naked pictures for 65 dlls but pubes pic for 99 dlls, so what does that naked pictures look like??
btw i'm not planning on buying anything

can be naked and still hide everything (behind a towel, hand, etc). No knowledge of what Austin does.

 

[JoshCG]

Since nobody cared to offer me some insight lol I went and did my research, very through.

Ok.. he's def playing. I see the deception, still not enough to label it scam but yes deception. Not fraud per de but still not good.

 

[ShadowDenizen]

The literal definition of "Fraud" (from dictionary.com):

1. Deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.

Sounds pretty spot-on to me. We all WANT to like Austin, but let's call a spade a spade.

And yes, there's a (slim) possibility that he may not be aware of what's happening with his management company, but it's his name and reputation and the buck ultimately needs to stop with him.

 

[Dokteki]

Since nobody cared to offer me some insight lol I went and did my research, very through.

Ok.. he's def playing. I see the deception, still not enough to label it scam but yes deception. Not fraud per de but still not good.

There are 40 pages of insight here, maybe we are tired of constantly repeating ourselves to people who won't look for themself.

 

[JoshCG]

There are 40 pages of insight here, maybe we are tired of constantly repeating ourselves to people who won't look for themself.

Maybe you have forgotten what it is to be a human being with education, perhaps the world has been horrible to you and everyone sucks in your life, but usually in the real world when you interact and you ask for help/guidance someone will assist, and I'm not making anyone responsible to provide me such information as you can see I got it, I'm simply referring to your response as if this wasn't a forum where people interact, if I wanted a database I would search one where you Don't engage with people, but to each their own. Just don't trip on human interactions my friend, we need less than that lack of empathy in this world.

 

[Dokteki]

Maybe you have forgotten what it is to be a human being with education, perhaps the world has been horrible to you and everyone sucks in your life, but usually in the real world when you interact and you ask for help/guidance someone will assist, and I'm not making anyone responsible to provide me such information as you can see I got it, I'm simply referring to your response as if this wasn't a forum where people interact, if I wanted a database I would search one where you Don't engage with people, but to each their own. Just don't trip on human interactions my friend, we need less than that lack of empathy in this world.

If you think my response was harsh, LPSG is not the place for you. I am happy to answer questions like yours The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and maybe 20th time they are asked. but then it gets VERY annoying that the questioner made no effort to look for an answer that is all over the thread. People ask about Austin's posts almost daily. So that has been answered 100s of times on this thread and the previous one that was deleted.

 

[Archrival993]

The literal definition of "Fraud" (from dictionary.com):

1. Deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.

Sounds pretty spot-on to me. We all WANT to like Austin, but let's call a spade a spade.

And yes, there's a (slim) possibility that he may not be aware of what's happening with his management company, but it's his name and reputation and the buck ultimately needs to stop with him.

He’s aware of how it works. He’s talked about it in interviews.

 

[Archrival993]

Maybe you have forgotten what it is to be a human being with education, perhaps the world has been horrible to you and everyone sucks in your life, but usually in the real world when you interact and you ask for help/guidance someone will assist, and I'm not making anyone responsible to provide me such information as you can see I got it, I'm simply referring to your response as if this wasn't a forum where people interact, if I wanted a database I would search one where you Don't engage with people, but to each their own. Just don't trip on human interactions my friend, we need less than that lack of empathy in this world.

I offered some insight and you started shooting me down. I told you who to ask specifically, you dismissed me. I told you to look back in the thread then, but you “don’t want a database.” Soooo what is it you want exactly?

 

[Hephaestion47]

Maybe you have forgotten what it is to be a human being with education, perhaps the world has been horrible to you and everyone sucks in your life, but usually in the real world when you interact and you ask for help/guidance someone will assist, and I'm not making anyone responsible to provide me such information as you can see I got it, I'm simply referring to your response as if this wasn't a forum where people interact, if I wanted a database I would search one where you Don't engage with people, but to each their own. Just don't trip on human interactions my friend, we need less than that lack of empathy in this world.

This isn't a debating society, this is an adult content forum. You asked a question that has been answered dozens of times because you couldn't be bothered to find the answer yourself. The fault is yours.

 

[Archrival993]

Here, I joined (and promptly unjoined) OF just to make this point. One of three messages within 10 minutes of subscribing.

Now, I don't know what's behind this lockscreen, but I can assure you it is not his cock. Even though it's labelled cock.

So, call it what you want. It's shitty either way.

 

[JoshCG]

If you think my response was harsh, LPSG is not the place for you. I am happy to answer questions like yours The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and maybe 20th time they are asked. but then it gets VERY annoying that the questioner made no effort to look for an answer that is all over the thread. People ask about Austin's posts almost daily. So that has been answered 100s of times on this thread and the previous one that was deleted.

No, my feelings were not hurt in our interaction and my response wasn't ill intended or with a negative emotion.

You have said it yourself, there's tons of people, some have asked, some of us are barely interacting with the post and we don't need to read all the pages to do so, simply move along when somebody else asks a question that has been answered, it's not like you're Austin yourself and you MUST answer me for the thousandth time.

It's about boundaries and respect. Yes you can choose to be annoyed by my comment, I wasn't disrespectful and since we're gonna interact with thousands of people in life sometimes is nicer if we choose to not react negatively to what bothers us specially if we are not responsible for the interaction, we choose to engage and we can either choose to be unnecessary harsh to others or understanding and just move along.

We don't need to make those situations our own and attack.

That's just me, and yes there's plenty of others who lack empathy, just remember not because everyone is like that I must be also behaving that way or use those situations to measure how I'm not "that bad". Now this is between you and me. You made it, so it can be an awesome experience and you can make my day with such a positive response that I will always remember you forever and hope to read you again, giving someone just a second of a nice thing to smile on their day. Thanks for replying again no ill intended comment.

 

[JoshCG]

I offered some insight and you started shooting me down. I told you who to ask specifically, you dismissed me. I told you to look back in the thread then, but you “don’t want a database.” Soooo what is it you want exactly?

My apologies all I read was that I should ask for his VIP tier and that's all still NO information provided. Like go ahead and find out (so I did). I actually followed that advise but if you tried to convey information for me to understand this was not exactly anything for me to understand much.

Remember my main question is gain insight on why is he scamming not why is he a terrible OF creator. Scamming meaning lying and technically stealing, being a fraud. But I didn't "shoot" you down, more like I expected more but didn't force that response from you. Sorry if it seemed that way but I did take your response seriously hence I went to find out. Thank you.