It's not made up. A number of political and economic observers with credentials define him as such. Your claim that it's made up is made up.
Name a few. For every one you provide that says Obama is a centrist, I'll provide two that say he's a leftist.
Well I think intentions count. Like "fer" insand bad intentions that I know are designed to fuck me (?)... I'd pick good intentions every fuckin' time.
Of course you would, we all would. Thats a wonderful strawman. This is more about the left claiming moral superiority, though they rarely have it, to control policy. Often the choice is exactly as I put it: "the just left" that doesn't work vs "unjust right" that will work. The left just wants more cronyism, hate, division, and strife. They thrive on it.
How quickly you forget that today's economic woes were set into motion under the "glory daze" of G.W.[/quote]What part of government is responsible for spending bills? I'll give you time to look up who was in control of congress from 2007-2010. Irocially, you can watch the founder of the Tea Party explain that our economic situation started under Bush. The Tea Party would have never supported Bush. He was out of line, Obama is out of orbit.
I believe I originally stated that there were racist elements within the Tea Party, elements that are of influence in that group's ideology. Let's say this, if they aren't they've done a shitty job of disavowing those factions within their group, haven't they.
There are racist elements in almost every group. Of course your party is no pillar of egalitarianism. Further, you can trace back every single position of the Tea Party to a solid economic argument about limited government. Not a single policy position was informed by racism. I'd dare you to find one.
Amy Kremer flat out said "this is not a racist movement, we don't want you (racists) here, go away if that is what you are about. This is about the fiscal issues." She said that one The View, one of the most watched shows on TV.
Hey, Morgan Freeman is an actged by the company you keep.
No. He's off his rocker. Not only that, how much of his opinion is informed by the hate-filled left media? Once the Tea Party was a real threat the left started using their one, now dull, tool: call the right racists. It didn't work as there is nothing racist about the Tea Party; well nothing more racist about them than any other given group.
A quite unfortunate statement on your part, imo.
choosing him was clearly a no-brainer. If you don't know that, I can't help you.
Let me clarify my statement. It is wrong to vote for a candidate because you want to see a person of that candidates race get elected. I think we all looked forward to the day when a black person would be president, and for the other races too.
I do take issue with your portrayal of your heroic efforts to right the wrongs of history. You changed nothing. Slavery still happened, Jim Crow laws still existed. Electing Barack changed nothing.
Why do you have to vote for him "in spite" of his race? Why do you have to overcome that in order to vote for him? Is being black a handicap? This is exactly what I mean. Inside of you is racism, so when you look out on the world you can't help but see it everywhere.
I have an absence of nothing. Racism has proved one thing: you cant fix it with more racism. Throughout history one race is on top, then the other. Never is a race satisfied. Why? Because of people like you. You think its perfectly fine to be racist so long as your end is justified; this is exactly how segregationists thought, how slavers thought.
Yeah. Balancing it on the backs of middle-class Americans while protecting the tax loopholes, write offs, etc. of the filthy rich.
Well, the rich pay the mass majority of the taxes, they should get the mass majority of the cuts. How do you give the lower income brackets cuts when they are already paying $0 in taxes? How much cheaper can you go than free-ride?
Yes, we expect the conservative loaded......... protection, didn't they?
I love this entire statement. First, the court is "loaded" as though there was some underhandedness in how the justices were appointed. Next, it must have been some greedy play for power or money. I mean, nobody could ever believe that Obamacare, or liberalism in general, is a failed ideology that creates poverty, moral hazard, and destroys wealth anywhere it can find it. I'll promise you right now, those conservative justices
believe liberalism is a harmful ideolgy that will destroy all we have worked for in this country if it's allowed to continue. It has nothing to do with money or elections, its an ideological debate where they don't agree with you.
Bear in mind however, it was a so-called "left minded hate filled economic illiterate" named Bill Clinton who HAD a fuckin' balanced budget, before you "geniuses" got your fuckin' hands on it
Amazing how little you remember/know. Who had both houses of the congress? Was that A) The Democrats, or B) Republicans. Ah yes, it was the Republicans. So, Billy boy didn't do it alone. Further, you claim "we" ruined it. G.W. was a tax and spend socialist. The Tea Party would have never supported G.W.