Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Celebrity Endowments' started by B_HungSofty, Apr 6, 2008.
what do u guys think of him
Well, uh . . . he's muscular. What else?
he looks pretty good, but to many muscles around his neck....makes him look like hes a no neck
he could pin me
umm roids im betting... his ball sack looks like dried up raisins hanging from a a very small twig of a cock :chairshot:
That many muscles = Small penis
Ape God. Nice body. Bet he's a bottom! lol
LOL! Oh boy, that's so true.
Ew. Ew. Ew.
All those nasty veins in his arms, yuck. I'm straight, but yuck.
he looks not nice....lol...
big ... definitely not a pretty boy ... wonder if I could survive hopping in the sack with him?
Way to many years of steroids.The bloated stomach is a dead give away of steroid abuse.Yuck.
If I had my choice of overly muscled, juiced up men I would probably choose Goldberg over Batista. However, I wouldn't be totally repulsed by either one. Whether or not I'd be willing to risk my puny body in a wrestling match in the sheets with either of the monsters is another story. I'd probably put 'em on a leash and take them for walks instead.
^^Loves me some Bill Goldberg, but I always dreamed about being slam fucked by Batista out in the alley behind Qualcom Arena or something. Like, right after a match when he's got all this pent up aggression. That'd be the best time...yeah.
Wow. Considering that the Castro revolution was 1959, Batista looks great.
I was thinking the same thing.
hes not bad lookin he has a nice body..and big muscles!
Why does sarcasm translate so badly here? You and I were the only ones who thought that was funny? Is it us or them?
I got a slight chuckle--maybe not a lot of history buffs??