Being Circumcised at birth

Catharsis

Loved Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 22, 2011
Posts
989
Media
6
Likes
632
Points
338
Location
New York, NY
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I'm glad you're happy but I don't think men on here complain about themselves but rather about the process. I think we all come to accept that there's not much we can do to change ourselves, but there's so much we cam do to change how things are done in the future.

That being said, it does strike odd that so many guys have such a problem with circumcision without any true complications. Yes, they do exist, but often times not in the men who are complaining and if I have to be honest, I have a hard time believing that so many men are so selfless to care about a problem that occurs in other men.

I'm not going to talk about my personal issues with circumcision because I did read the first post... So I'm just posting my two cents.
 

Mastur

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Posts
733
Media
421
Likes
2,673
Points
498
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Jut saw a very interesting and documentary on YouTube that was made by journalist/filmmaker Michael Schaap (The Netherlands), asking quite frankly: Mom, Why Did You Circumcise Me? It is in Dutch, but very well subtitled.

Unfortunately, due to the nature of the documentary, images of minors can be seen and therefore I cannot post a link. But, I highly recommend you take the time to search and watch it.
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
You will never ever get the whiners to shut the fuck up already. Never. Until you are miserable with them is the goal.

Happy people here:
[FONT=&quot]Adult Circumcision Stories - Men Circumcised As Adults Tell It As It Is...[/FONT]
Just couldn't resist stirring the pot, eh Sargon? We all believe how "not obsessed" you are about this. Really. :rolleyes:
I'm glad you're happy but I don't think men on here complain about themselves but rather about the process. I think we all come to accept that there's not much we can do to change ourselves, but there's so much we cam do to change how things are done in the future.
This is it right here.
That being said, it does strike odd that so many guys have such a problem with circumcision without any true complications. Yes, they do exist, but often times not in the men who are complaining and if I have to be honest, I have a hard time believing that so many men are so selfless to care about a problem that occurs in other men.
They do exist. The internet has a way of bringing people together. :smile:
 

buzzrider7

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
823
Media
30
Likes
4,543
Points
523
Location
Sacramento (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
In this case there is. It's not overnight, but restoration is an option. It's working great for me and has allowed me to redirect my energy feeling bummed about having been cut into changing myself to how I'd like to be. I'm having a ton of fun with the process, and it's a great way to invite people of my chosing to check out my "progress" (i.e. hey, wanna see my cock?!).

I think we all come to accept that there's not much we can do to change ourselves,
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
:lmao: Wow. Just wow. You call legitimate scientific studies biased and worthless, and then direct people to a site where it is PAINFULLY obvious that when they faked their "testimonials", they were lacking a basic understanding of how a foreskin works? Seriously?

Just look at the first one. This was supposedly an uncut guy and his foreskin didn't roll back and forth during sex, but his girlfriend could hold it back manually? Did he have selective phimosis? Then the scare tactic of how it was "nearly impossible" to get a condom on or get it to stay on? Go to Xtube, search "uncut condom" and see how true that looks to you. Smegma accumulating if he so much as missed a shower? They even go so far to say that he could smell it when no one else could, making it sound like an uncut guy will be really self-conscious about it. And to top it all off, before the guy tells anything about his personal experience, he thanks the site's creator's for making a "neutral and informative" website on the subject. Congratulations Sargon, you just found the circumcision website equivalent of the "fair and balanced" Fox News. :clap:

Please leave. The adults are talking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DildoShwaggins

Catharsis

Loved Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 22, 2011
Posts
989
Media
6
Likes
632
Points
338
Location
New York, NY
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
In this case there is. It's not overnight, but restoration is an option. It's working great for me and has allowed me to redirect my energy feeling bummed about having been cut into changing myself to how I'd like to be. I'm having a ton of fun with the process, and it's a great way to invite people of my chosing to check out my "progress" (i.e. hey, wanna see my cock?!).
Wow. Well, I certainly appreciate the invitation. ;)

Ahem... It's true, restoration is an option but it doesn't actually restore anything... It just stretches the skin, doesn't it?

I should clarify that, for me, a "preference" for being uncircumcised is not merely about aesthetics but instead for function... This is not the topic for that, though.
 
Last edited:

buzzrider7

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
823
Media
30
Likes
4,543
Points
523
Location
Sacramento (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
While the skin does stretch some during the process, this goes away once it's over. The restoration happens from growing new skin cells that elongate the skin to reform the sheath that covers the glans. It is functional - it's new skin with nerve endings (= greater sensation and pleasure), and it keeps the glans moist and sensitive. Sorry if this is off topic - just wanted to provide a little information from a first-hander experiencing it personally.

Wow. Well, I certainly appreciate the invitation. ;)

Ahem... It's true, restoration is an option but it doesn't actually restore anything... It just stretches the skin, doesn't it?

I should clarify that, for me, a "preference" for being uncircumcised is not merely about aesthetics but instead for function... This is not the topic for that, though.
 
3

332823

Guest
While the skin does stretch some during the process, this goes away once it's over. The restoration happens from growing new skin cells that elongate the skin to reform the sheath that covers the glans. It is functional - it's new skin with nerve endings (= greater sensation and pleasure), and it keeps the glans moist and sensitive. Sorry if this is off topic - just wanted to provide a little information from a first-hander experiencing it personally.


How much skin do you estimate you had before you started?
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
Jut saw a very interesting and documentary on YouTube that was made by journalist/filmmaker Michael Schaap (The Netherlands), asking quite frankly: Mom, Why Did You Circumcise Me? It is in Dutch, but very well subtitled.

Unfortunately, due to the nature of the documentary, images of minors can be seen and therefore I cannot post a link. But, I highly recommend you take the time to search and watch it.
Just watched the video. I was pleasantly surprised to see that there were a variety of viewpoints presented in the video, talking about why you would or wouldn't do it, including men that were just fine with being cut themselves. Gave a range from people saying they thought it was more hygenic, to people being neutral on the subject and merely talking about legality and ethics, to that one lady saying the baby's entire mental development is altered as a result. Really gave some insight into the vastly different feelings that can be expressed on the subject.

I'd have to say the one moment that really gave me pause was the circumcision doctor who, when flatly asked "Is circumcision mutilation?" immediately deadpanned, "Of course it is." It was like one of those statements where someone says something, and you wait a few seconds for them to realize what they said and hurriedly try to say something that starts with, "Wait, I didn't mean..." Only that part never came from the guy. It was kinda like asking a doctor that performs abortions whether abortion is murder, and being met with, "Of course it is."

Very thought provoking.
 

B_625girth

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
2,224
Media
0
Likes
136
Points
193
Location
midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
gee,really?? get the fuck over it. a piece of skin the size of your fingernail was cut off. post #2 says it all.
none of the 50 women I have fucked, has ever said, "wow! you have a big circumcised cock." in fact, it's never been mentioned.

get on with your life, there are more important things.
 

Mumzi

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
469
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
163
Location
Calif
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Go look at a foreskin again. Lot bigger than a fingernail.

This is not about foreskins being good or bad. No, I don't know any women that would care much if a foreskin is there or not.

It (for me anyway) is about letting men decide what to do with it.
It's about babies.



gee,really?? get the fuck over it. a piece of skin the size of your fingernail was cut off. post #2 says it all.
none of the 50 women I have fucked, has ever said, "wow! you have a big circumcised cock." in fact, it's never been mentioned.

get on with your life, there are more important things.
 

buzzrider7

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Posts
823
Media
30
Likes
4,543
Points
523
Location
Sacramento (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
I think this is the main problem here. It seems that a lot of the people like 625Girth who say that it doesn't matter, is not worth the time to consider, etc. have never even seen an intact penis in person, nor do they have any idea how a foreskin works. I had no idea either until getting to examine some up-close and personally. Now that I understand, it blows my mind why something so incredibly useful and beneficial would be cut off.

For most straight American men though (the ones having the babies), this opportunity will probably never happen. I think the question is how to educate circimcised men as well as women who have only ever been with circumcised men so they do understand what foreskin is, how it works, why it is useful, and, of course, that it is around 15-20 square inches of skin on an adult male.

Go look at a foreskin again. Lot bigger than a fingernail.
 

Mastur

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Posts
733
Media
421
Likes
2,673
Points
498
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
:lmao: Wow. Just wow. You call legitimate scientific studies biased and worthless, and then direct people to a site where it is PAINFULLY obvious that when they faked their "testimonials", they were lacking a basic understanding of how a foreskin works? Seriously?

Just look at the first one. This was supposedly an uncut guy and his foreskin didn't roll back and forth during sex, but his girlfriend could hold it back manually? Did he have selective phimosis? Then the scare tactic of how it was "nearly impossible" to get a condom on or get it to stay on? Go to Xtube, search "uncut condom" and see how true that looks to you. Smegma accumulating if he so much as missed a shower? They even go so far to say that he could smell it when no one else could, making it sound like an uncut guy will be really self-conscious about it. And to top it all off, before the guy tells anything about his personal experience, he thanks the site's creator's for making a "neutral and informative" website on the subject. Congratulations Sargon, you just found the circumcision website equivalent of the "fair and balanced" Fox News. :clap:

Please leave. The adults are talking.

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
 

someperson

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Posts
4,091
Media
9
Likes
1,845
Points
198
Location
Los Angeles, California
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
While the skin does stretch some during the process, this goes away once it's over. The restoration happens from growing new skin cells that elongate the skin to reform the sheath that covers the glans. It is functional - it's new skin with nerve endings (= greater sensation and pleasure), and it keeps the glans moist and sensitive. Sorry if this is off topic - just wanted to provide a little information from a first-hander experiencing it personally.

Even though I am uncut moisture has been a issue.
It's not moist enough. It has been slowly getting Keratinization and the loss of sensitivity has been noticeable. I have been using a oil based moisturizer(vaseline) Been using it for 5 day all ready noticeable increase of sensitivity and softer less cracked glans.

Water based moisturizer sucks and has to be changed every 8 hours other wise it will start to smell.


I have also been able to get a double ejaculation (without losing erection.) yesterday which I have not been able to do for a while.
 

lucidbass

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Posts
284
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
53
Gender
Male
There's plenty of threads all over the internet where circumcision is discussed where people from both sides rag on each other, where one calls the other filthy or mutilated. It's so fucking stupid that people worry so much about a piece of skin on someone else's cock that lives thousands of miles away. It's essentially body-modification, unless it's done for health reasons, yet you don't see so many arguments about people getting their tongue pierced or not (which can be really, REALLY dangerous).

Obviously, men are so defensive about it because they're trying to feel good about their penis and are scared of having the 'wrong penis' by being circumcised or not, which causes all this bullshit drama. Though really in an erect state, they both look the same and both circumcised and uncircumcised dicks will get filthy if you don't wash them.

I'm not circumcised myself, but I'd rather spend time thinking about my penis than someone else's.
 
Last edited:

rollerboy

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Posts
387
Media
31
Likes
40
Points
53
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I was circumcised at birth and am generally happy with my cock. The only negative was a nasty scarred area just behind the head that was discolored. Looked very bad and was the reason for a lot of teasing in schol. Finally got the scar covered with a flame tattoo ! now it looks much better !
 

Mushroom9

1st Like
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Posts
18
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
473
Location
Chicago
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I was circumcised at birth and I am happy with my dick because I have a big cock. But I will always wonder how much happier I might have been had I been allowed to choose whether or not I was circumcised.

My dad was uncircumcised. I asked him why he had me circumcised when he wasn't. He said it was because he was afraid I would be teased in school. Yet this man was over 50 and had never chosen to be circumcised. How afraid of shame must our parents be to deny us of what they themselves are unwilling to give up!!