- Joined
- Jun 30, 2007
- Posts
- 1,929
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 89
- Points
- 183
- Location
- California
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
It sounds so stupid,"a gay". I agree, it's like saying "I missed work cause I had the diarrhea".Is their anyone else who really hates being referred to this way? It just really bugs me when someone uses the word "gay" as a noun.
I am gay (adjective), but I am not "a gay".
"You people" is the most offensive term known to man.
OMG all this political correctness! you do realize that you are subscribing to a tendentious sophistry that, to subscribe to a particular view, or agree with an ultimate conclusion, REQUIRES you ignore certain facts, that would prevent you agreeing with that conclusion ... one of those objective facts, is that generalizations do point out or reveal an objective truth about individuals as member of groups, be they groups of race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation
"The gays" is too close to "the blacks," "the Spaniards," "those people," "you people" which are all too close to "the niggers, the spics, the fags, the bitches, the dykes, the whatever" for my taste.
It sounds so stupid,"a gay". I agree, it's like saying "I missed work cause I had the diarrhea".
Call yourself homo or homosexual. It's liberating.
What I think would be liberating if these words no longer had no power or force. People give a lot of power to words. You take the power away from the words. You own them.
I know I'm being naive here, but why can't a person just be called a man, a woman, a child, a human, whatever. Why give power to the labels. Who cares if someone is straight, gay, or in between. I really don't care what race someone is, either. I would rather just be called a man from the United States. I am proud of the fact that I'm a Christian, I'm proud that I'm from South Carolina, and I'm proud that I'm of Italian heritage, but while those make up part of me, none of them are the label I want, because it still wouldn't fully identify me.
Call me naive...
I know I'm being naive here, but why can't a person just be called a man, a woman, a child, a human, whatever. Why give power to the labels. Who cares if someone is straight, gay, or in between. I really don't care what race someone is, either. I would rather just be called a man from the United States. I am proud of the fact that I'm a Christian, I'm proud that I'm from South Carolina, and I'm proud that I'm of Italian heritage, but while those make up part of me, none of them are the label I want, because it still wouldn't fully identify me.
Call me naive...
If only
I am in complete agreement with you. Trouble is people want to know the small details about others, and if we don`t we get them thrust apon us anyway.
I always laughed whenever i read the Daily Star in the UK( not a regular occurance but if some builder is going to leave it on the seat of the Jubilee line who am i to argue!)
You see the Star always, and i mean ALWAYS puts the age of whoever they are talking about either just before or just after the persons name. For those of you in the UK that dont believe me, go check it out.
It seems to be inherent in them to let us know how old the rest of the world is wether we care or not. The same is true of anything that singles a person out as different. Be they Blonde,tall,fat,gay or anything else that may strike them out from the crowd. The press loves a noun.