- Joined
- Apr 16, 2003
- Posts
- 647
- Media
- 576
- Likes
- 36,745
- Points
- 698
- Location
- Portland (Oregon, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
javyn: i use to be a major shooter, huge volume, and distance. the last few months though ive been having pretty weak orgasms and cumming very little. kinda curious what the deal is now, why im doing that.
grantstephens: Only ever seen mine or porn and I would say mine is pretty average. Sometimes I can shoot up to my neck (lying down) and other times I can barely get to my belly.
Does anyone know of a way to produce more cum. I'd like to shoot buckets (or a least a shot glass or two) if I could.
Currently working on kegals and I always drink lots of water.
Does anyone know of a way to produce more cum. I'd like to shoot buckets (or a least a shot glass or two) if I could.
Currently working on kegals and I always drink lots of water.
SpeedoGuy: [quote author=shortchanged link=board=sex;num=1067660087;start=0#19 date=02/25/04 at 00:46:26]....and the MAJORITY of the cum is left in those huge shafts of yours! 
[/quote]
Is that true? I would have guessed the vast majority gets forced out by the intense contractions.
As for me, I've always been a big shooter. While I didn't always think of myself as possessing a large penis, I always suspected the flood of semen I produce was above average. That suspicious was confirmed when virtually every one of my gf's remarked about it.
SG
[/quote]
Is that true? I would have guessed the vast majority gets forced out by the intense contractions.
As for me, I've always been a big shooter. While I didn't always think of myself as possessing a large penis, I always suspected the flood of semen I produce was above average. That suspicious was confirmed when virtually every one of my gf's remarked about it.
SG
GottaBigOne
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2004
- Posts
- 1,035
- Media
- 13
- Likes
- 255
- Points
- 303
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Dallas (Texas, United States)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I've always shot a bigger than average load, but for the last fews years i've been able to shoot em a lot father. This is after I work my pc muscles with kegel excersizes.
This workout has also allowed me to stem my ejaculate and not shoot if i want to. It's very handy when you dont want to get messy.
I don't think my penis size has anything to do with seminal volume. When I jerk off or fuck for ten minutes my loads aren't as big as when I jerk off for more than an hour. I think the amount of time you allow your prostate to make seminal fluid has an effect on your load.
Sometimes when I've been jerking off for a very long time (sometimes 2 hours, i dunno I like to hold of orgasm and edge for a long time) I can feel my prostat swelling and almost ache to get rid of its load. When I do finally come its very violent and I am not able to hold back. It usually shoots out across the room, like 8 feet and there is uaully more than 6 heavy luiqid spurts.
I usually don't have thick come, because I usually come about three times a day on average (I'm oversexed)
This workout has also allowed me to stem my ejaculate and not shoot if i want to. It's very handy when you dont want to get messy.
I don't think my penis size has anything to do with seminal volume. When I jerk off or fuck for ten minutes my loads aren't as big as when I jerk off for more than an hour. I think the amount of time you allow your prostate to make seminal fluid has an effect on your load.
Sometimes when I've been jerking off for a very long time (sometimes 2 hours, i dunno I like to hold of orgasm and edge for a long time) I can feel my prostat swelling and almost ache to get rid of its load. When I do finally come its very violent and I am not able to hold back. It usually shoots out across the room, like 8 feet and there is uaully more than 6 heavy luiqid spurts.
I usually don't have thick come, because I usually come about three times a day on average (I'm oversexed)
- jonb,
I usually cum a lot too; it seems that you cum more if you drink a lot of fluids. Other correlations include how long it's been since you last came, and how much stimulation there is.
I oftentimes cum several times. Other times, I just want to get it over with so I just fake it. Of course, faking it can't work with oral or with a handjob.
I oftentimes cum several times. Other times, I just want to get it over with so I just fake it. Of course, faking it can't work with oral or with a handjob.
My dick lacks a lot being as big as what most of you guys carry around, but I've never seen or heard of anybody shooting more baby batter than I did in my hayday. I've told this before in a post somewhere in LPSG, but repeating it now.
I had a friend catch mine in a shot glass once, just to see what it measured. It was well over one fluid ounce, and about half way to the next 1/2 mark. So I always reported it 1.25 fluid ounces. I've done lots of kegel exercises, so that might have helped in volumn as well as distance.
These days its seldom that I don't shoot at least 2 tablespoons full. You've heard of guys being full of shit? I have always been full of cum! :-[
Luke
I had a friend catch mine in a shot glass once, just to see what it measured. It was well over one fluid ounce, and about half way to the next 1/2 mark. So I always reported it 1.25 fluid ounces. I've done lots of kegel exercises, so that might have helped in volumn as well as distance.
These days its seldom that I don't shoot at least 2 tablespoons full. You've heard of guys being full of shit? I have always been full of cum! :-[
Luke
tripod2004: John Holmes was enormous and good fun to watch. But, when he came it was drip, drip, drip!
Ron Jeremy is pretty poor in the spurting department as well despite having a good 9 incher
Ron Jeremy is pretty poor in the spurting department as well despite having a good 9 incher
DeepThroat_#2: [quote author=GuyFromLA link=board=sex;num=1067660087;start=0#6 date=11/02/03 at 17:23:49]
Actually this is partially true, only 30% of the spermical fluid is produced in the prostate, the other 70% is produced in the spermical vesicle.
GuyFromLA[/quote]
I think you meant "seminal vesicles," (semen storage vessels).
This question made me think of the porn start Peter North. Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
Perhaps it's an evolutionary thing (my belief leans this direction), leading males to enjoy seeing cum on a woman because that tendency leads to passing on our genes...nature doesn't differentiate between our sperm and someone else's in this case; I imagine it saying in a clumbsy, Frankenstein-like voice, "Sperm on woman good.").
Actually this is partially true, only 30% of the spermical fluid is produced in the prostate, the other 70% is produced in the spermical vesicle.
GuyFromLA[/quote]
I think you meant "seminal vesicles," (semen storage vessels).
This question made me think of the porn start Peter North. Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
Perhaps it's an evolutionary thing (my belief leans this direction), leading males to enjoy seeing cum on a woman because that tendency leads to passing on our genes...nature doesn't differentiate between our sperm and someone else's in this case; I imagine it saying in a clumbsy, Frankenstein-like voice, "Sperm on woman good.").
[quote author=DeepThroat_#2 link=board=sex;num=1067660087;start=20#29 date=02/29/04 at 12:43:44]
This question made me think of the porn start Peter North. Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
[/quote]
Because we imagine putting ourselves in his place. It's a vicarious thrill.
This question made me think of the porn start Peter North. Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
[/quote]
Because we imagine putting ourselves in his place. It's a vicarious thrill.
Marraskuu: Well seeing other guys cum does lead to a guy feeling protective and produce more of it...not all the reason they want to see North, but part of it, at least for some.
[quote author=DeepThroat_#2 link=board=sex;num=1067660087;start=20#29 date=02/29/04 at 12:43:44]
Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
Perhaps it's an evolutionary thing (my belief leans this direction), leading males to enjoy seeing cum on a woman because that tendency leads to passing on our genes...
[/quote]
I've always wondered about this, too. An observation is that the fuck scenes in both gay and straight porn usually end in exactly the same way-- with a big dick being masturbated by hand until it creams OUTSIDE someone.
At one time, I thought it was because the ability to powerfully shoot a big load was a sign of male virility, which is really what porn is about. Obviously, you can't see this if the load is shot inside. (Although some gay "bareback" videos like to show how much cum dribbles out of the ass after the load is shot inside.) But then I noticed that a lot of porn stars aren't good shooters, but just drip and dribble. Yet, the camera always gives us a good view of this weak load, so I guess the reason must be something else.
I don't think wanting to see the cum outside has anything to do with passing on genes. On an intellectual level, we all know it has to be inside for this to happen. But from even a gut instinctual level, there is an urge to put the cum inside. After all, if primitive man had an urge to pull out and cum outside, chances are the species would have died out.
As a gay man, where pregnancy and passing of genes is obviously impossible, even I have a strong urge to cum inside. (Given that I usually can't cum with a condom, which isn't the same anyway, and given the realities of safe sex today, this rarely gets to happen.) Some of the guys I fuck appear to feel the same way. Once in a while, after I've worn the bottom out and am stroking myself to blow my load, I've had him sense that I'm about to cum, jump up and sit down hard on my cock, taking me to the hilt in his sore hole, to receive my load inside of him. This is risky behavior, not to be condoned, yet in the heat of the moment, the desire to leave/receive cum inside overcomes rational thinking. Clearly, on a primitive level, I want the bottom to walk away from sex with part of me still inside him, and he wants the same.
Of course, this usually doesn't happen, as I try to practice safe sex. But given the choice between spewing my load on the bedsheets, and hosing down my partner with it, I'll take the latter choice. It's not the same as leaving it inside, but a good second.
However, I think in porn there is something else going on. If leaving the load inside is an instinctual first choice, they would show this. The problem is that there is then no way to prove that the sex was real, that the guy actually came. I think in order to distinguish hardcore porn from soft stuff, the directors believe it is important to show the cum shot. As I said, in some gay bareback videos, they do cum inside, but in this case that adds an extra erotic factor, because of the taboo of bareback sex. However, afterward, they always demonstrate that a good load was shot, such as by showing the load dribbling back out of the hole. I do remember one straight porn film where the man always did cum inside the woman. But in this case, the woman, who had paid to be bound and fucked, demanded to know how she could be sure that the guy actually came in her. "Not to worry," he said. "We always verify orgasm," upon which his assistant used the palm of her hand to capture this big puddle of cum that dribbled out of the woman's twat as the guy pulled out, and then brought it around for the woman to lick up, with the requisite close-up shots.
So, I think a big part of the external cum shots on camera is to show that the sex was real, that the guy actually did cum, and did receive pleasure and gratifiaction. But to do this alone, it wouldn't be necessary to cum all over the partner. Indeed, some fetish porn shows the cum shooting all over someting else, some fetish item. But most show the cum splattered all over the fuckee. And, when you consider things like Bukkake, it's obvious that the more the better. I think this has to do with an aspect of submission or degradation, showing the fucker to be dominant over the fuckee.
The same aspect of cumming externally also appears in sexual fantasy, for example the fantasy letters published by porn magazines. I'm not sure if this is a case of men imitating what they see in porn, or of porn showing what men really fantacize about. But often such "literature" contains something along the lines of "As I felt my muscles tense up, I pulled my ten inches out of her throat, took my thick meat in my hand, and blasted at least a quart of cum all over that pretty face." What I read into this is dominance over, and degradation of, the woman.
Anyone have any guesses as to why straight guys are so friggin' interested in seeing this guy cum on women?
Perhaps it's an evolutionary thing (my belief leans this direction), leading males to enjoy seeing cum on a woman because that tendency leads to passing on our genes...
[/quote]
I've always wondered about this, too. An observation is that the fuck scenes in both gay and straight porn usually end in exactly the same way-- with a big dick being masturbated by hand until it creams OUTSIDE someone.
At one time, I thought it was because the ability to powerfully shoot a big load was a sign of male virility, which is really what porn is about. Obviously, you can't see this if the load is shot inside. (Although some gay "bareback" videos like to show how much cum dribbles out of the ass after the load is shot inside.) But then I noticed that a lot of porn stars aren't good shooters, but just drip and dribble. Yet, the camera always gives us a good view of this weak load, so I guess the reason must be something else.
I don't think wanting to see the cum outside has anything to do with passing on genes. On an intellectual level, we all know it has to be inside for this to happen. But from even a gut instinctual level, there is an urge to put the cum inside. After all, if primitive man had an urge to pull out and cum outside, chances are the species would have died out.
As a gay man, where pregnancy and passing of genes is obviously impossible, even I have a strong urge to cum inside. (Given that I usually can't cum with a condom, which isn't the same anyway, and given the realities of safe sex today, this rarely gets to happen.) Some of the guys I fuck appear to feel the same way. Once in a while, after I've worn the bottom out and am stroking myself to blow my load, I've had him sense that I'm about to cum, jump up and sit down hard on my cock, taking me to the hilt in his sore hole, to receive my load inside of him. This is risky behavior, not to be condoned, yet in the heat of the moment, the desire to leave/receive cum inside overcomes rational thinking. Clearly, on a primitive level, I want the bottom to walk away from sex with part of me still inside him, and he wants the same.
Of course, this usually doesn't happen, as I try to practice safe sex. But given the choice between spewing my load on the bedsheets, and hosing down my partner with it, I'll take the latter choice. It's not the same as leaving it inside, but a good second.
However, I think in porn there is something else going on. If leaving the load inside is an instinctual first choice, they would show this. The problem is that there is then no way to prove that the sex was real, that the guy actually came. I think in order to distinguish hardcore porn from soft stuff, the directors believe it is important to show the cum shot. As I said, in some gay bareback videos, they do cum inside, but in this case that adds an extra erotic factor, because of the taboo of bareback sex. However, afterward, they always demonstrate that a good load was shot, such as by showing the load dribbling back out of the hole. I do remember one straight porn film where the man always did cum inside the woman. But in this case, the woman, who had paid to be bound and fucked, demanded to know how she could be sure that the guy actually came in her. "Not to worry," he said. "We always verify orgasm," upon which his assistant used the palm of her hand to capture this big puddle of cum that dribbled out of the woman's twat as the guy pulled out, and then brought it around for the woman to lick up, with the requisite close-up shots.
So, I think a big part of the external cum shots on camera is to show that the sex was real, that the guy actually did cum, and did receive pleasure and gratifiaction. But to do this alone, it wouldn't be necessary to cum all over the partner. Indeed, some fetish porn shows the cum shooting all over someting else, some fetish item. But most show the cum splattered all over the fuckee. And, when you consider things like Bukkake, it's obvious that the more the better. I think this has to do with an aspect of submission or degradation, showing the fucker to be dominant over the fuckee.
The same aspect of cumming externally also appears in sexual fantasy, for example the fantasy letters published by porn magazines. I'm not sure if this is a case of men imitating what they see in porn, or of porn showing what men really fantacize about. But often such "literature" contains something along the lines of "As I felt my muscles tense up, I pulled my ten inches out of her throat, took my thick meat in my hand, and blasted at least a quart of cum all over that pretty face." What I read into this is dominance over, and degradation of, the woman.
JimEllsworth5: For me it depends on how I get to the orgasm.
If I take a little time and go right to the orgasm there's a modest amount of cum with the first shot shooting six to eight inches, then the rest shorter and shorter and shorter distances until it just oozes out.
If it's been a few days since I came and if I take my time and build up to if over the course of a few hours, then it's quite explosive and quite voluminous. The biggest and best loads have come after several hours of masturbation, bring myself close to cumming several times and finally letting go. I've shot past my head, while laying down, several times and have shot quite a few loads from the same orgasm several feet (well past the end of the towel i put down) while standing and holding my penis after a long, long masturbation session.
If I take a little time and go right to the orgasm there's a modest amount of cum with the first shot shooting six to eight inches, then the rest shorter and shorter and shorter distances until it just oozes out.
If it's been a few days since I came and if I take my time and build up to if over the course of a few hours, then it's quite explosive and quite voluminous. The biggest and best loads have come after several hours of masturbation, bring myself close to cumming several times and finally letting go. I've shot past my head, while laying down, several times and have shot quite a few loads from the same orgasm several feet (well past the end of the towel i put down) while standing and holding my penis after a long, long masturbation session.
jangel1976: It takes me a long time to cum usually (not that I mind), but I allways shoot a HUGE load.
Very thick usually too.
Very thick usually too.
ORCABOMBER: Eric, good point, I don't have any quibbles with that. As mentioned, it is something that shows the man has "enjoyed himself".
UncutStudent: I pre-cum alot and I cum alot and I'm just 7.5 uncut, So I don't think size matters when it comes to cumming.
[quote author=UncutStudent link=board=sex;num=1067660087;start=20#37 date=03/02/04 at 01:01:27]I pre-cum alot and I cum alot and I'm just 7.5 uncut, So I don't think size matters when it comes to cumming.[/quote]
"JUST" 7.5? Man, don't belittle your dick. You're well hung. An inch or so above average makes lots of difference. It helps to keep the average in mind and not members of this group when you compare you size.
"JUST" 7.5? Man, don't belittle your dick. You're well hung. An inch or so above average makes lots of difference. It helps to keep the average in mind and not members of this group when you compare you size.
JimEllsworth5: I had a long fun session of masturbation this morning.
Starting at a little before 9:00am and staying hard, well anywhere from 80% to 100% hard, until a little past noon.
My orgasm was quite intense and the volume of the ejaculate was pretty large, enough to soak the wash cloth I used to catch it.
Starting at a little before 9:00am and staying hard, well anywhere from 80% to 100% hard, until a little past noon.
My orgasm was quite intense and the volume of the ejaculate was pretty large, enough to soak the wash cloth I used to catch it.
