Big Cock Guys are like Superman...
- Thread starter bigonepleaser
- Start date
xxuxu
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Posts
- 216
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 14
- Points
- 248
- Location
- New York (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
- b.c.,
Actually your analogy is flawed. If you recall Bill's rather astute analysis on the Superman character in Kill Bill Part 2, he observed that Clark Kent was the fabrication; that suit, tie, and those glasses the disguise.
So "normally" Superman is who he is, son of Jor-El. It's the clothing that masks the reality.
B_coffeegirl
1st Like
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Posts
- 11
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 1
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Leesville, La
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Female
Ahh but to take it a level deeper, Clark Kent is the guiding force behind everything that Superman does. If Superman 3 taught us anything (other than the dangers of making synthetic kryptonite with tobacco tar) it was that Superman, without Clark, is kind of a jerk. So for my money I would say that a hung guy who is attentive and uses his "super power" with an eye towards others (i.e. my vagina's) needs is a Clark Kent, where as a clueless hung guy is a jerk Superman.
Well I think its the other way around ... women are SuperWomen because we have the power to make it grow sometimes without even touching it
I hate to shatter your illusions but men have that power too :tongue:
LMAO !!! Superman is my favorite super hero, but it has nothing to do with big cock. I like your analogy though. Who could have ever thought of a short Asian guy with an eight inch dick? I met one in real life.
Exactly! It is a man's brain that has the power to either accept or reject the sarah_m's of the world. Well, when they use their brains! :biggrin1:
Well I meant that some men have the power to induce boners in other men...:tongue:
D_Petherick_Poundlouder
Experimental Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 6,172
- Media
- 15
- Likes
- 14,512
- Points
- 643
- Location
- Massachusetts (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Well I think its the other way around ... women are SuperWomen because we have the power to make it grow sometimes without even touching it
I love that 'power' that women have over me. :wink:
The hands-on (or mouth) approach is greatly appreciated as well.:smile:
- b.c.,
LOL. Did I? Maybe. But Max, the distinction I was trying to make between the op and my position was that he said "normally he's Clark Kent...." What I'm suggesting is that "normally" he's not.
For example "normally" (and we're certainly no Superman...far from it) we're just guys hanging around home in flip flops, undies or in various states of undress and that's how we're most comfortable, or at least, that's "normalcy" for me.
I (and others) put on glasses, a tie, shirt and trousers to go out into the workforce and in so doing I'm assuming the garb necessarily acceptable to blend into the whole. Likewise so does Superman.
In fact as Clark, the disguise takes on an exaggeration of "normalcy" so that not only has he donned the clothing needed to facilitate his blending in but he exaggerates buffoonry, timidity, and other attributes that are the extreme opposite of his truer self in order to more effectively disassociate himself from suspicion of anything even remotely "super".
Ahh but to take it a level deeper, Clark Kent is the guiding force behind everything that Superman does. If Superman 3 taught us anything (other than the dangers of making synthetic kryptonite with tobacco tar) it was that Superman, without Clark, is kind of a jerk. So for my money I would say that a hung guy who is attentive and uses his "super power" with an eye towards others (i.e. my vagina's) needs is a Clark Kent, where as a clueless hung guy is a jerk Superman.
Yes. Great points Coffeegirl. That examination of how much of Clark is Superman (and vice versa) has been the subject of many episodes though in Superman 3 if I recall, Superman was separated from himself, the bad half being portrayed in his super garb and his better half portrayed as Clark.
This duplicity of roles gets even greater play in the t.v. series Smallville in which Clark (not yet even called Superman, but "The Blur") clings tenaciously to his identity as Clark, stubbornly resisting his greater calling.
In truth it could be said that Clark, though a disguise, is merely an extension of Superman because (excepting for the splitting of his personalities in Superman 3 and in similar occurrences in the comic series) that compassion and humility that Clark portrays must necessarily be an attribute of Superman too in order for him to do the heroic deeds he does.
In fact I'd take the analogy further to suggest that Superman needs Clark because being Clark is a whole lot easier. As Clark he can become one of the masses, can go about his business relatively unknown and unnoticed. Aside from the expectations placed upon him by those closest to him and by his chosen profession he'd not be held to anything greater, would not suffer any greater scrutiny.
But as Superman, well... in the first place the perception of how "super" one may be is always from the point of view of the beholder, is it not? Gifted though he may be he still has his "kryptonite", has to still live up to the hype and deal with the latest baddie ready to take him down.
And after all is said and done he still cannot be all things to everyone or satisfy everyone's expectations of him. He cannot stop every bullet, catch every falling plane, rescue every kitten, or save every life.
Being "Superman" can be hell...Clark, easy. Methinks he takes great comfort from being "Clark".
Last edited:
- b.c.,
Speak for yourself, pipsqueak. :biggrin2:
Oh wait, I just visited your gallery. Holy Crap, Batman!
lol. Just visited??
