Big Cock - New Finds

Jimmy-sox

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Posts
477
Media
0
Likes
270
Points
283
Location
Oldenburg (Lower Saxony, Germany)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
so your debate tactic is to not prove anything, but insult me. Oh if only I had your debate skills youre right. Again leave it alone and go back to your gay porn im tired of being insulted.
It is called reductio ad absurdum: If your definition were applied equally to all threads in this sub-forum, it would render about half of it misplaced and belonging in either a gay or a lesbian sub-forum. Since neither you nor anybody else is likely to subscribe to that view, your definition is idiotic, and so, consequently, is your initial complaint here.

The you-are-gay-hence-ignorant-of-straight-things argument, on the other hand, is more of lame cop-out than an actual argument. A guy jerking off by himself in a thread called Big Cock - New Finds is neither gay nor straight, but nonetheless entirely consistent with the topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _antialias_

ColonelLingus

Superior Member
Joined
May 30, 2015
Posts
1,387
Media
0
Likes
2,691
Points
183
Gender
Male
It is called reductio ad absurdum: If your definition were applied equally to all threads in this sub-forum, it would render about half of it misplaced and belonging in either a gay or a lesbian sub-forum. Since neither you nor anybody else is likely to subscribe to that view, your definition is idiotic, and so, consequently, is your initial complaint here.

The you-are-gay-hence-ignorant-of-straight-things argument, on the other hand, is more of lame cop-out than an actual argument. A guy jerking off by himself in a thread called Big Cock - New Finds is neither gay nor straight, but nonetheless entirely consistent with the topic.
fine then we can agree to disagree. a guy jacking off doesnt bother me, but its not straight porn. straight porn involves a woman thats what straight porn is. otherwise its pure dude, no woman, therefore by definition not straight porn. if we were to get technical i guess a guy jacking off belongs in "everything else" however I would list it under gay.
 

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,761
Media
0
Likes
3,959
Points
208
Gender
Male
Yeah, I tried to get an ID on that guy here ages ago and didn't succeed, but I didn't have a picture or link. I had seen him on a couple VHS tapes from way back in the 80's. He's about the size of Holmes in some of it, so you'd think his name would be out there. As with Holmes though, his EQ isn't always too impressive (possibly from pumping). Who the hell is he?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rice55

YankeeJoe

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Posts
1,891
Media
0
Likes
1,071
Points
198
Yeah, I tried to get an ID on that guy here ages ago and didn't succeed, but I didn't have a picture or link. I had seen him on a couple VHS tapes from way back in the 80's. He's about the size of Holmes in some of it, so you'd think his name would be out there. As with Holmes though, his EQ isn't always too impressive (possibly from pumping). Who the hell is he?
I don’t think that guy is anywhere near the size of Holmes.
Yes, he’s above average in length and girth, but I’m not seeing it...
 

Shepardson

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Posts
2,761
Media
0
Likes
3,959
Points
208
Gender
Male
I’ve managed to find this and I’m sure it’s him
Derrick Taylor
We have a winner! - Much thanks Beaverboy. I always figured I'd have heard his name, but it rings no bells.

YankeeJoe- He's probably slightly smaller than Holmes, but it varies from scene to scene (pump amount probably). There was a fairly bad video called something generic like "Busty Babes" I knew him from, where they looked almost identical. With the huge jump you took from Holmes down to the second tier guys back in the 80's, you'd have thought this guy would've made more of a splash. Unlike the "Hook", he also seems to be from the US.