Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Show Off' started by meatpackingbubba, May 14, 2012.
This thread is for posting big dick pictures for authenticity analysis.
Comments are encouraged.
What are your opinions regarding the first four?
The only one that might be suspect, and that's a huge MIGHT is the first one, only because of the underwear and slightly off cock color. The rest look legit to me.
I'd say the first looks most likely to be fake. Strange bulge out about halfway down the length.
The third one looks fake. The dick looks different from the rest of the picture.
1 and 3 look fake.
See, I didn't think #1 looked fake, just shot at an advantageous camera angle.
#2, I couldn't decide
#3 and 4 photo edited
Hard to say about any of them decisively, none of them are really gargantuan sizes (which is usually the easy to spot sign of photoshop). I'm seeing about 7-8 inches max in any of the 4.
Some of them do look a little dis-proportional though if that makes sense.
1, 3 and 4 could just all be flattering angles.
3 & 4 are for sure edited. There are broken lines that cannot be attributed to pixelation. There is a blur section in #1 that makes it seem fake, and #2 just seems disproportionate and there is a section of the penis that changes color in a way that doesn't look natural.
Well here goes:
I'm pretty sure 2 and 4 are edited, although 2 is a very good job. If real, 2 is hanging about 8" in what appears to be a semi flaccid state. If real, 4 is a 10 inch erection that measures 7.5" in circumference.
1 and 3 seem the least suspect to me, but not 100% sure of any of the four.
View them then review them. Post your thoughts.
1 looks fake to me
2 looks real--just taken at a flattering angle
3 and 4 for me are hard to tell...could be real or could be fake. I'd say due to the gargantuan size of 4 that it's more likely to be fake, but I'm not sure
1, 3, and 4 edited
2 looks real enough
Real or fake?
There are a few clues---I'm calling faked.
first set, third photo looks like a former member here
#2 faked due to duplicated veins
Another two for consideration:
Definitely fake. See the break in the attached enlarged view (fake1) where two different dick images were combined.
Also fake. Notice in the attached enlargement (fake2) that there is an absolutely straight line across the guy's shirt where two different images were combined and, above and below that line, the flesh of his dick shaft doesn't match and there's even a slight mismatch along that same line where the inside edge of his right bicep doesn't line up quite exactly.
Pretty poor fakes, actually.
If anything they're tricks of perspective. Much easier than photoshop, I'd say.