Big slit

D_vbyjgyl

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
36
When I was circumcised as a baby, I think I got meatal stenosis or something so my slit was cut wider (a meatotomy). I'm kinda self conscious about it now and I've never come across anyone else with it. Is there anyone that has the same thing and would like to message me and talk about it? I would love to be able to talk with someone like me. Also, please no one that got it done by choice. I'm not interested in sounding. Thanks a bunch!

 
When I was circumcised as a baby, I think I got meatal stenosis or something so my slit was cut wider (a meatotomy). I'm kinda self conscious about it now and I've never come across anyone else with it. Is there anyone that has the same thing and would like to message me and talk about it? I would love to be able to talk with someone like me. Also, please no one that got it done by choice. I'm not interested in sounding. Thanks a bunch!


It might help if you put up an image, so we could see what it looked like.
 
When I was circumcised as a baby, I think I got meatal stenosis or something so my slit was cut wider (a meatotomy). I'm kinda self conscious about it now and I've never come across anyone else with it. Is there anyone that has the same thing and would like to message me and talk about it? I would love to be able to talk with someone like me. Also, please no one that got it done by choice. I'm not interested in sounding. Thanks a bunch!


The reverse seems to have happened to me, my slit is tiny, it was painful when I needed a catheter, and I've always been a "trickler", not a "gush like a cart-horse" type of guy.
 
What you have has nothing to do with circumcision. The formation is a birth defect that belongs to a group of conditions called hypospadias/epispadias. I would suggest that you do a search on these two conditions. You have a very mild case and the circumcision you have was an attempt to prevent a blocked urethra and looks quite successful. The foreskin, often in its normal adhesion to the glans at a young age, blocks the urethra. The cure for this is removal of the foreskin. Prevention, a blocked urethra trumps having a foreskin on any day of the week. Very often in this condition the foreskin is deformed and sometimes the urethra is as far back as between the legs or anywhere on the underside of the penis. In another condition the urethra can open on the topside of the penis with the remains of the penis looking like a cauliflower. Sometimes there is no opening. With some of these guys the deformation is so bad they require dozens of reconstruction surgeries. Count yourself fortunate, You can reproduce and enjoy what you have. I would advise, leave well enough alone. I have talked to a few guys that had it worked on and had nothing but misery afterwards. No feeling in their penis, malformations worse than they started with, unsuccessful surgeries, etc. Consider carefully.
 
There's a webcam model that I've seen with it. He has a huge black dick, but his mushroom tip is similar to yours
 
Technopeasant's point is probably both correct and incorrect. While there may be an element of incredibly mild hypospadias, there are also clearly adhesions on the underside of your glans from your circumcision. It really wouldn't surprise me if those adhesions had required a meatotomy.

Good luck in your search for similar guys, Tyler.
 
It looks to me as though you had hypospadias as an infant, but it wasn't discovered until your circumcision, and they tried to do an on the spot repair.

The cut line is very low on the underside of the penis, and near to the glans. Where the frenulum would be there isn't actually any of the pale inner foreskin present, but instead there's a square of darker shaft skin which looks out of place. This will be what they used to patch up the hole in the shaft where the urethra was emerging. You can see where this skin is anchored to either side of the glans, this was probably done intentionally in the process, and isn't just a case of adhesions resulting from a sloppy circumcision.

It's not the most cosmetically appealing result, but this is why infant circumcision isn't recommended when hypospadias is suspected. Typically the doctor will wait until a later age to perform a reconstructive procedure, and in the process they can better harvest the tissue of the foreskin to use in closing the hole, and produce a more attractive appearance in the end.

If you're really concerned about it then there are always procedures available, but it would typically involve cutting the two sides and stitching them together, and you'd need to wear a catheter while it healed to keep the shape of the opening and prevent the pressure of the urine from splitting the wound open. If you're not that bothered then I wouldn't worry too much about it; having a long meatus isn't that uncommon, and I've heard that some guys with them like having the tip of the tongue slipped in there during a blow job, so you might be able to use it to your advantage.
 
Last edited:
So I guess this kinda gives a one of a kind look, huh? I guess I could live with that. :biggrin1: Anyone wanna share pics of their slits? Always fun to compare.