bigger penis with magnets
- Thread starter wannabigman
- Start date
placebo effect doesnt change your body. it can effect your mind or maybe make your penis start hurting but it cant increase it.
Wow. I bet some of you were aware of this already. I'm linking to this not to teach you about BGH, because if you don't know about that by now, you've been under a rock. I'm not posting it to teach you that our government is to be mistrusted because it can be bought off. Youshould already know that, too. I'm writing this for those people out there who still love Fox News. I want them to see for themselves how Fox presents news, and what the attitudes are regarding truth at the highest levels. Also, I post this to teach you an important tidbit of law.
The important tidbit of law is at the end. So is the most significant example of Fox News' deceptive word usage in broadcasts. The last minute of this broadcast is a shocker, folks.
YouTube - Reporters Blow Whistle on FOX News
-------------------------------------------------------
still trust your precious government?
The important tidbit of law is at the end. So is the most significant example of Fox News' deceptive word usage in broadcasts. The last minute of this broadcast is a shocker, folks.
YouTube - Reporters Blow Whistle on FOX News
-------------------------------------------------------
still trust your precious government?
I can see where the cracked pot is; just above your shoulders. More pity you dont research the aspects you so readily condemn: if only to save you from looking such an idiot. You might realise in the process that several of the practices list by you are currently employed by the medical profession, not that that curries favour with you it seems! Likewise magnetism is used extensively in the profession, from treating heart conditions (and I dont just mean pace makers) to killing various tumours. Ever heard of MRI scanning? Surprise, surprise, the M stands for magnetic. As for Refexology, that has its origins in Asian medicine and is an aspect of Shiatsu, another practice respected by doctors in the west, but then what do the medics and several million Chinese know compared to you? I only hope you never get any other kind of sick my dear, itll cause you such a dilemma.
No wonder you have problems pal, mixing science fiction with science fact. Your body runs on electricity, through the 90% water it comprises of check it out.
The majority of my friends are in the medical profession, instead of reading articles by nuts I take on board what their considerations are during the course of many discussions with them. It's largely futile pasting links to sites listing studies on the net, there are no controls to what sites are created on the net therefore it's hard work finding sources which are of credible authority, and for every study disproving a peripheral practice there will be one allegedly proving it.
MRI scanning does not treat illnesses.
Reflexology and acupuncture suppose there are energy centres in the body - surprisingly these energy sources are unprovable, and in a German study it was found sticking needles anywhere in the body was as effective as sticking them in the supposed acupuncture points, while acunpuncture does seem to have a placebo effect the demonstration that any points were as effective as the supposed energy centres shows that the 'science' behind acunpuncture is more than doubtful.
Iridology supposes that disease processes and injuries manifest by marks in the eyes. As any ENT doctor could tell you all the marks and patterns present in the iris are present from birth except ones that are caused by injury or disease which actually effects the eye - hence the possibility of one day using iris recognition as identification. Jensen's chart says the heart is only represented in the left eye while Kriege finds the heart represented in both eyes. Many iridologists ask what medication you are receiving before they begin their examination, hardly surprising that they can then tell you what conditions you're suffering from.
I really can't be bothered trawling through the net to prove something on an internet site, if people are gullible to part with their money for something that's based on spurious theory that's their prerogative.
MRI scanning does not treat illnesses.
Reflexology and acupuncture suppose there are energy centres in the body - surprisingly these energy sources are unprovable, and in a German study it was found sticking needles anywhere in the body was as effective as sticking them in the supposed acupuncture points, while acunpuncture does seem to have a placebo effect the demonstration that any points were as effective as the supposed energy centres shows that the 'science' behind acunpuncture is more than doubtful.
Iridology supposes that disease processes and injuries manifest by marks in the eyes. As any ENT doctor could tell you all the marks and patterns present in the iris are present from birth except ones that are caused by injury or disease which actually effects the eye - hence the possibility of one day using iris recognition as identification. Jensen's chart says the heart is only represented in the left eye while Kriege finds the heart represented in both eyes. Many iridologists ask what medication you are receiving before they begin their examination, hardly surprising that they can then tell you what conditions you're suffering from.
I really can't be bothered trawling through the net to prove something on an internet site, if people are gullible to part with their money for something that's based on spurious theory that's their prerogative.
So most of what you right is based on hearsay rather than from your own endeavours studying at a seat of learning?
Did I say it did?
So is God. And by the way, it’s unproven, not unprovable, write?
I take it this was also gleaned from hearsay and are you sure that article wasn’t written by a German nut? The supposed acupuncture points are called Tsubos and you don’t have to stick a needle in them, adjacent is good enough. I’m glad to see that this practice is only doubtful rather than doesn’t work at all.
I’m not really up on Iridology, but you criticism would carry more weight had you quoted hearsay from an eye specialist rather than someone involved in ears, noses and throats. It’s a bit like asking a hardware engineer to right a computer program, or a dentist to look at your haemorrhoids. I mean, the field of medicine is so vast, if it wasn’t we’d be stuck with just GPs. As for Iridology examinations and examiners asking what medication one is on; one tells them what ailment one has by answering! Little wonder the examiner can confirm this by what they find? However, can you tell me what happens in the event of a client/patient not being on medication prior to the exam?
Doesn’t this contradict what you say in your opening paragraph?
Likewise magnetism is used extensively in the profession, from treating heart conditions (and I don’t just mean pace makers) to killing various tumours. Ever heard of MRI scanning? Surprise, surprise, the ‘M’ stands for magnetic.
That paragraph leaves little doubt you're under the illusion that magnetism is used to treat diseases.
The ENT was a mistype as I was reading something and transposed that from the article.
Hearsay isn't what I hear with my own ears now is it, it would be hearsay if someone told me someone had said it. Your own words prove my point on iridology, they're only diagnosing the diseases you've just told them you have. Yes in the case of a iridologist picking up an ailment not already diagnosed they're invariably wrong, I could give you a source but doubtless you'd dismiss it as being from a sceptical source.
The energy sources are unprovable because they don't exist.
And do try to spell write correctly.
That paragraph leaves little doubt you're under the illusion that magnetism is used to treat diseases.
The ENT was a mistype as I was reading something and transposed that from the article.
Hearsay isn't what I hear with my own ears now is it, it would be hearsay if someone told me someone had said it. Your own words prove my point on iridology, they're only diagnosing the diseases you've just told them you have. Yes in the case of a iridologist picking up an ailment not already diagnosed they're invariably wrong, I could give you a source but doubtless you'd dismiss it as being from a sceptical source.
The energy sources are unprovable because they don't exist.
And do try to spell write correctly.
Having had an MRI scan I’m under no illusion; I site MRI purely to illustrate further the use of magnetism in medicine and isn't killing a tumour treating a disease? And what about ultrasonics, another treatment using magnetism?
Wow, admitting to being wrong, that’s a first! Besides, I though you didn't read articals and only quoted what you heard from friends?
quote=SpoiledPrincess;1095588]
Hearsay isn't what I hear with my own ears now is it, it would be hearsay if someone told me someone had said it. .[/quote]
Well doesn’t that make what you’re telling me you’ve heard from your friend who have heard from someone else, hearsay? Or have they all had first hand experience....er, I take it you do have more than one friend?
Well doesnt that make what youre telling me youve heard from your friend who have heard from someone else, hearsay? Or have they all had first hand experience....er, I take it you do have more than one friend?
Get a room you two:biggrin1:
I was reluctant to come back to this solely because seahorses seems unable to compose a logical post, he seems to feel that pacemakers are magnetic and that magnetism is used to treat tumours. He lambasts me for failing to cite sources yet doesn't notice his lack of sources.
I could fill a post with sources backing up what I say regarding alternative therapies but for every study saying a practice is non effective there will be one that says it is effective. A web site isn't the place to post a long winded article bogged down with citation after citation which people aren't going to check. Threads are glanced at and forgotten, so this would in any case, be a huge waste of time, they're of a conversational not academic flavour, akin to a chat in the pub not a debate at Oxford. In addition people often have trouble separating fact from opinion, if I state something is my opinion without stating sources to support it it's challenged as being just my opinion, even if backed up by a hundred studies they'd still be the studies I'd selected to coincide with my personal beliefs, hence they'd prove nothing. Personal observation, personal conversation and the pseudo scientific explanations as to why they work has convinced me of the non efficacy of homeopathy/acupuncture/chinese medicine and other complementary medicines.
Opinions are opinions, we've all formed them over a lifetime, we all apply different criteria to what we consider a standard of proof, but not citing a plethora of studies does not negate an opinion any more than citing 1001 studies confirms it.
I could fill a post with sources backing up what I say regarding alternative therapies but for every study saying a practice is non effective there will be one that says it is effective. A web site isn't the place to post a long winded article bogged down with citation after citation which people aren't going to check. Threads are glanced at and forgotten, so this would in any case, be a huge waste of time, they're of a conversational not academic flavour, akin to a chat in the pub not a debate at Oxford. In addition people often have trouble separating fact from opinion, if I state something is my opinion without stating sources to support it it's challenged as being just my opinion, even if backed up by a hundred studies they'd still be the studies I'd selected to coincide with my personal beliefs, hence they'd prove nothing. Personal observation, personal conversation and the pseudo scientific explanations as to why they work has convinced me of the non efficacy of homeopathy/acupuncture/chinese medicine and other complementary medicines.
Opinions are opinions, we've all formed them over a lifetime, we all apply different criteria to what we consider a standard of proof, but not citing a plethora of studies does not negate an opinion any more than citing 1001 studies confirms it.
I was making fun of all this bull. That's what it is too: BULL.
Magnets won't make my penis bigger, my car get better mileage, or keep calcium from building up in my water heater. You can ask my neighbor and my aunt about the calcium build up. They both had these magnetic scale build up preventer's installed on their water systems. When my neighbor's heating element burned out the plumber who repaired it cleaned a 5 gal bucket full of calcium out of the heater. My aunt's heating coil in her boiler stopped up in less than two years. This crap doesn't work and is a money making gimmick. The mileage improving magnets have be debunked many times. If you want to believe it, and waste your money, go right ahead. It's nothing to me...
I've used magnetic loops for a tendon pain in my foot. Seems to work. Then again, it could be it got better because I paid attention to it and watched out for it. And added the pepper cream and the brace onto the foot.
Like some folks who use copper bracelets and magnets for health, I'd be tempted to say they help a little, but it is no excuse for not taking better care of yourself. They alone will not do everything.
Acupuncture does have benefits, but some die hard medical schools deny the use of it and regulate the benefits as "unproven", even though its been used for thousand of years. The AMA and chiropractic doctors have been at odd with one another for decades.
Medical organizations operate like a bureaucracy: there is no room for new ideas. Even if they work. DMSO seems to help people with diabeties. You'd search for years to find a dcotor willing to deal with it.
Magnets and your penis enlargement seem to draw a ? in my mind.
Like some folks who use copper bracelets and magnets for health, I'd be tempted to say they help a little, but it is no excuse for not taking better care of yourself. They alone will not do everything.
Acupuncture does have benefits, but some die hard medical schools deny the use of it and regulate the benefits as "unproven", even though its been used for thousand of years. The AMA and chiropractic doctors have been at odd with one another for decades.
Medical organizations operate like a bureaucracy: there is no room for new ideas. Even if they work. DMSO seems to help people with diabeties. You'd search for years to find a dcotor willing to deal with it.
Magnets and your penis enlargement seem to draw a ? in my mind.
"When blood flows through this magnetic field, the blood cells spin then separate from each other giving each cell more surface area to carry much more oxygen and vital nutrients to your penis. The magnetic field also widens your penis's blood vessels allowing more blood to flow through."
"The second benefit comes from Tourmaline and Germanium which emit negative ions (also known as "Air Vitamins") and Far Infra-Red Rays (also known as "Growth Rays")."
I also recommend watching the video on their site. peloop | Easy Penis Enhancement and Penis Enlargement
So here's the question: Why is this ridiculous?
Magnets don't make red blood cells spin. In fact, have you ever seen a magnet, on its own, make anything spin? They will make charged particles line up, but without an electric current, that's all.
Infra-red rays DO help repair human tissue (The Hot House: Far Infra-Red Dome"), but they are not generated from magnets (certainly not in useful amounts). If you want to use IR for penis growth, you need to be doing PE.
"Air Vitamins"??? I've seen products that create negative air particles. Maybe someone can enlighten me, but do these actually increase health? And do magnets produce negative air particles (enough to benefit someone's health)?
"The second benefit comes from Tourmaline and Germanium which emit negative ions (also known as "Air Vitamins") and Far Infra-Red Rays (also known as "Growth Rays")."
I also recommend watching the video on their site. peloop | Easy Penis Enhancement and Penis Enlargement
So here's the question: Why is this ridiculous?
Magnets don't make red blood cells spin. In fact, have you ever seen a magnet, on its own, make anything spin? They will make charged particles line up, but without an electric current, that's all.
Infra-red rays DO help repair human tissue (The Hot House: Far Infra-Red Dome"), but they are not generated from magnets (certainly not in useful amounts). If you want to use IR for penis growth, you need to be doing PE.
"Air Vitamins"??? I've seen products that create negative air particles. Maybe someone can enlighten me, but do these actually increase health? And do magnets produce negative air particles (enough to benefit someone's health)?
fruits come from the earth and they give you nutrients, why cant herbs that come from the earth also have health benefits that rival man made medicine spoiled princess?
Similar threads
