Black American Men & Penis size

Are black American men in general bigger than their white counterparts?

  • Yes, this is often the case, and holds true over the larger average statistically.

    Votes: 811 54.1%
  • No, this is a myth.

    Votes: 689 45.9%

  • Total voters
    1,500

Sagittarius84

Legendary Member
Joined
May 16, 2018
Posts
2,111
Media
0
Likes
2,203
Points
158
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You assume that all Slave Owners raped their slaves. There was also a lot of forbidden romance too.
That assumption would be correct because to engage in sex with someone you own, despite their "consent" is rape by default. The strawman of "forbidden romance" consists of the microscopic minority of slave owners that opted to free their slaves based upon some moral imperative and then get in relationships with them, and even then there are power dynamics and white savior complexes that play into how inherently toxic or abusive these relationships most likely played out. If you, like myself, are a Black person in the Americas and find out you have European DNA that entered your ancestry pre 1860, it is much more likely that genetic intrusion is a result of rape or some violation of consent than not, no matter what rose tinted whitewashing people like to apply to America's history.
 

Uncutsouthernboy

Superior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Posts
1,691
Media
7
Likes
6,558
Points
418
Location
Georgia
Gender
Male
That assumption would be correct because to engage in sex with someone you own, despite their "consent" is rape by default. The strawman of "forbidden romance" consists of the microscopic minority of slave owners that opted to free their slaves based upon some moral imperative and then get in relationships with them, and even then there are power dynamics and white savior complexes that play into how inherently toxic or abusive these relationships most likely played out. If you, like myself, are a Black person in the Americas and find out you have European DNA that entered your ancestry pre 1860, it is much more likely that genetic intrusion is a result of rape or some violation of consent than not, no matter what rose tinted whitewashing people like to apply to America's history.

What about the Southern Whitepeople who have a degree of Negro DNA that points to before the Civil War? I personally do not (according to Ancestry.com) but a lot of my Caucasian DNA matches do have some African DNA. The all Southern matches are more likely to have some. My brother-in-law for one 3% Subsaharan . I do have DNA matches to African Americans who have a percentage of European DNA that can only come from a distant ancestor. One that comes to mind is a lady whose White DNA is English and dates back to about 1790. By all the people who match it can only be from one ancestor's family. They did not own Slaves and never did. That would more than likely indicate a bi-racial relationship in Tennessee. It could be the female was a Black/Whtie prostitute and got knocked up by a White/Black client. It was also fashionable in Louisiana for a man to have 2 families. One with a White woman and another with a Black woman. Each woman and her children lived in equal luxury. There is evidence in my own family of White male/Black female relationships starting before the War and continuing long after and with children involved.

Things were very complicated in the South. Still are.
 

HOU_HEADHUNTER

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Posts
1,768
Media
0
Likes
8,089
Points
233
Location
Houston, Texas, United States of America
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
What about the Southern Whitepeople who have a degree of Negro DNA that points to before the Civil War? I personally do not (according to Ancestry.com) but a lot of my Caucasian DNA matches do have some African DNA. The all Southern matches are more likely to have some. My brother-in-law for one 3% Subsaharan . I do have DNA matches to African Americans who have a percentage of European DNA that can only come from a distant ancestor. One that comes to mind is a lady whose White DNA is English and dates back to about 1790. By all the people who match it can only be from one ancestor's family. They did not own Slaves and never did. That would more than likely indicate a bi-racial relationship in Tennessee. It could be the female was a Black/Whtie prostitute and got knocked up by a White/Black client. It was also fashionable in Louisiana for a man to have 2 families. One with a White woman and another with a Black woman. Each woman and her children lived in equal luxury. There is evidence in my own family of White male/Black female relationships starting before the War and continuing long after and with children involved.

Things were very complicated in the South. Still are.
There were mixed race black people that were able to pass for white. Passing was something that only the racially ambiguous black people could do and they did this with great risk. Often changing their identity and living as a white person in order to have a better life. This might explain why some southern white people have a small percentage of Subsaharan African heritage in their ancestry. Somewhere in their lineage someone was able to pass as white.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XAngel97