Black Guys Bigger Dick Theories

D

deleted15807

Guest
Most of you are falling on your SWORDS over something so irrelevant. Who gives a flying fuck about which race is bigger. Get it up, keep it up, and have as much safe/consenting sex as humanly possible. END OF THREAD

If ONLY they would. A quick search of long gone threads show the the subject won't die. Jesus get a fucking life will you? Worrying about what's in some other guys pants GAWD so pathetic.
 

preeman36

Expert Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Posts
191
Media
0
Likes
123
Points
513
Location
London
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Placing this link here for posterity, which presents a tidy table of all those studies, and a couple more, recently mentioned:

International Journal of Impotence Research - Table 5 for article: Penile length and circumference: an Indian study

It does seem to have a curious suggestion, for those who like to assume. Presumably based on this we can suggest that the Caucasian groups, which is to say the studies in predominately Caucasian regions, have the largest. And that is followed by Indian, and then finally in last place the Nigerian sample.

Certainly flies in the face of the stereotypes; however, it must be reiterated that the age range for the Nigerian sample is distinctly lower than all the other studies. Maybe that explains it, or perhaps not. I do think it is significant though.

And also note that the Korean samples actually do "ring true" with the stereotype.

I think it more or less reinforces the stereotypes actually, what with Asians mostly smaller than Caucasian, while the African sample is suspect, e.g. missing data and dramatically limited age range sample.

Oh well, carry on with the controversy! Rabble rabble rabble!

Bro, just give up, people here have their heads well and truly stuck in the sand and think that a characteristic predetermined by genes cannot differ between populations expressing different variations of genes.

A lot of it goes down to self esteem of the predominantly white board (who get validation through an internet forum about dick size) who feel their masculinity has been compromised. As such, unwinnable battle unless you have hard scientific journals and there hasn't really been one as its not an issue really respected researchers will really pursue. So according to LPSG there's no difference between asians, whites and blacks (lmao) :biggrin1:

If it makes you sleep like a baby at night I guess...:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exbiker
9

927838

Guest
Bro, just give up, people here have their heads well and truly stuck in the sand and think that a characteristic predetermined by genes cannot differ between populations expressing different variations of genes.

A lot of it goes down to self esteem of the predominantly white board (who get validation through an internet forum about dick size) who feel their masculinity has been compromised. As such, unwinnable battle unless you have hard scientific journals and there hasn't really been one as its not an issue really respected researchers will really pursue. So according to LPSG there's no difference between asians, whites and blacks (lmao) :biggrin1:

If it makes you sleep like a baby at night I guess...:rolleyes:

That "white men deny the idea of differences" notion (in my opinion) seems like a bit of a cop-out to the fact that very little evidence supports that side of the argument. With that lack of evidence comes the "blame game". Essentially attempting to make their point through discrediting and questioning the motives of the other side in place of hard evidence.

There is far more evidence that would seem to suggest no differences as opposed to differences.

This (again my opinion) is all a load of stereotypical crap. Which, as many people have said earlier on here, originated from the days of slavery for various reasons. As for the Asian/Indian stereotype, I'm not exactly sure, but I'm sure there is an explanation.

I would like to think people on this board don't view color at all, and simply look at the reliable evidence we have, which the majority of would support the notion there are no significant differences.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jujube

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Posts
676
Media
0
Likes
272
Points
283
This is all a load of stereotypical crap. Which as many people have said earlier on here, originated from the days of slavery for various reasons. As for the Asian/Indian stereotype, I'm not exactly sure, but I'm sure there is an explanation.
I personally have encountered more tiny dicks in Asia than I have in the United States. However, I also have encountered more huge dicks in Asia than I have in the United States.

One possible explanation is that the variance of penis size really is greater among Asians than among American whites. On the other hand, I have heard about white guys with very tiny dicks (from e.g. the Howard Stern show), so I suppose they probably do exist, but I just have never met one in a sexual encounter. Perhaps this reflects greater stigmatization of small penes in American culture of the present day, resulting in lower self-esteem of American men with small penes and correspondingly lower motivation to actively seek sexual partners.

Also, the hypothesis that my lower rate of encounters with very small penes in the US is due to greater "self-censorship" of small dicked guys would not explain the fact that I have encountered more extremely well hung guys in Asia than in the US.
 

Riven650

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Posts
1,599
Media
3
Likes
98
Points
268
Location
Norfolk UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Ok, here comes a theory for what it's worth:

European explorers and missionaries came back from Africa with very exciting stories to tell. A lot of upper class Europeans had never seen a naked body apart from their own. Africa is a very hot place, and in hot weather the flaccid penis is not shrivelled but hangs long and loose. A lot of the African tribes shave their body hair, and as we know, shaving the pubic hair makes the penis look longer. Stories about naked 'savages' and their strange customs and lifestyles made very good copy for the explorers' books and magazine articles. Not many explorers wrote about penis size, and these were the days before scientific study, as we know it, so no proper research was done. But black penis size could be hinted at by an after dinner speaker at a gentlemen's club, and he could exaggerate all he liked.
 

playainda336

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Posts
1,991
Media
223
Likes
2,358
Points
443
Location
Greensboro (North Carolina, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Since when does the USA represent all caucasian men? Or Korea all asian men?

You just don't get the point.
I don't get the point? I thought the point was all these studies are BS. :confused:
 

playainda336

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Posts
1,991
Media
223
Likes
2,358
Points
443
Location
Greensboro (North Carolina, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Honestly, until they do comprehensive studies on a representative racial population of the whole world, you're not really getting anything.

Also, if these studies are talking about people who live in and or citizen of these countries, they could all be White guys in Nigeria. Or only Indian guys in America. Or Black guys in Korea.

None of these factors are pertinent or conducive to the conversation and furthermore are being used to skew perception towards a particular point that's negligent because the truth is everybody of every race comes in small, medium, and large.
 

LACJohn

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
223
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
The biggest problem with the interpretation of these studies lies in the fact that people, and I include MYSELF in this grouping, are generally incapable of "extrapolating" data across a large population.

Dunbars number of 150 is a relatively good estimate of how many persons an individual can cogitate over.....but when you look at studies over wide populations of millions of people, things go awry. admittedly, with myself as well!


To put it in simpler terms: our brains can't handle data on large groups of people! We learn and know each other on an individual basis.


So African cock ends up being slightly bigger, on average, than cock elsewhere. But what does this really mean? If you were to pull a random black guy from a lineup, you are NOT much more likely to pull a guy who has a small cock than from a lineup from a different demographic! Its almost as likely a size queen cheats on a black guy with a white guy with a bigger cock as well as the reverse situation!

Generally speaking, the distribution of cock sizes amongst INDIVIDUALS is about the same between races! When you compare the bell curve itself, black guys are only SLIGHTLY farther to the right! If anything, white male variance might be larger, with more white men with micropenises and jonah falcon sized horse cocks. Does this make sense?



This means nothing on the individual level! The point I'm trying to make here, is why do you care? Its hilarious, because theres fetish porn going both ways. Cuckold porn with blonde girls getting dug out by hung black males, and bukkake porn with black girls getting railed by hung white guys dressed as rednecks.


When you take a step back its pretty funny. In the end of the day, big cock prevails irrespective of race.
 
Last edited:

perthjames

Cherished Member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Posts
339
Media
0
Likes
293
Points
533
Location
Sydney (New South Wales, Australia)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
The thing which "gets" me about all of this commentary about average penis sizes (flaccid and erect) by race, country etc is that we're generally talking about a difference of 1-2cm. In the grand scheme of things, that ain't much if the average penis size is one country is 8cm flaccid and in another it's 9cm flaccid. In one country it's 14cm erect, in another it's 15cm erect. All countries have larger and smaller, and there's probably some great research around about extremes, but when it comes to the stock standard average dick, there's not a lot of difference.
 
Last edited:

LACJohn

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
223
Media
0
Likes
9
Points
163
The thing which "gets" me about all of this commentary about average penis sizes (flaccid and erect) by race, country etc is that we're generally talking about a difference of 1-2cm. In the grand scheme of things, that ain't much if the average penis size is one country is 8cm flaccid and in another it's 9cm flaccid. In one country it's 14cm erect, in another it's 15cm erect. All countries have larger and smaller, and there's probably some great research around about extremes, but when it comes to the stock standard average dick, there's not a lot of difference.


That's exactly what I'm getting at. Great post. Simply put, if you care or have a *problem* with those very slight differences in average size across a population, something is more wrong with your beliefs than the data. You'll see black guys seeking out big white cock porn just as often as you'll see white guys seeking big black cock porn.

just take a step back and smile.
 

amadordelsexo

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
1,645
Media
41
Likes
101
Points
133
Location
currently valencia venezuela
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
yes mate this is the tendency and the dark male proud
some time I ask myself if any guy I would rather be black with huge dick or white with small one or average
of course white guy with huge dick must feel extra proud.
but also think a black guy with small dick must feel very sad,
the amount of black guys with small and average dick is the same as white guys with huge dick,
and opposite the amount of black guy with huge dick is same as white guy with small and average dick is as a rule.
and if we count asia and indian guys, the average size prevail 5 to 6 inches lenght
all them win to africa and a select amount of guys with huge dick in america and europe