MrMXYZPTLK
Expert Member
haha those were great!
Most of you are falling on your SWORDS over something so irrelevant. Who gives a flying fuck about which race is bigger. Get it up, keep it up, and have as much safe/consenting sex as humanly possible. END OF THREAD
...but why is a study in Nigeria representative of all Black penises.
And they did all Caucasians and based all Black penises on Nigeria...like ugh...-_-
Placing this link here for posterity, which presents a tidy table of all those studies, and a couple more, recently mentioned:
International Journal of Impotence Research - Table 5 for article: Penile length and circumference: an Indian study
It does seem to have a curious suggestion, for those who like to assume. Presumably based on this we can suggest that the Caucasian groups, which is to say the studies in predominately Caucasian regions, have the largest. And that is followed by Indian, and then finally in last place the Nigerian sample.
Certainly flies in the face of the stereotypes; however, it must be reiterated that the age range for the Nigerian sample is distinctly lower than all the other studies. Maybe that explains it, or perhaps not. I do think it is significant though.
And also note that the Korean samples actually do "ring true" with the stereotype.
I think it more or less reinforces the stereotypes actually, what with Asians mostly smaller than Caucasian, while the African sample is suspect, e.g. missing data and dramatically limited age range sample.
Oh well, carry on with the controversy! Rabble rabble rabble!
Bro, just give up, people here have their heads well and truly stuck in the sand and think that a characteristic predetermined by genes cannot differ between populations expressing different variations of genes.
A lot of it goes down to self esteem of the predominantly white board (who get validation through an internet forum about dick size) who feel their masculinity has been compromised. As such, unwinnable battle unless you have hard scientific journals and there hasn't really been one as its not an issue really respected researchers will really pursue. So according to LPSG there's no difference between asians, whites and blacks (lmao) :biggrin1:
If it makes you sleep like a baby at night I guess...![]()
I personally have encountered more tiny dicks in Asia than I have in the United States. However, I also have encountered more huge dicks in Asia than I have in the United States.This is all a load of stereotypical crap. Which as many people have said earlier on here, originated from the days of slavery for various reasons. As for the Asian/Indian stereotype, I'm not exactly sure, but I'm sure there is an explanation.
I don't get the point? I thought the point was all these studies are BS.Since when does the USA represent all caucasian men? Or Korea all asian men?
You just don't get the point.
I don't get the point? I thought the point was all these studies are BS.![]()
The thing which "gets" me about all of this commentary about average penis sizes (flaccid and erect) by race, country etc is that we're generally talking about a difference of 1-2cm. In the grand scheme of things, that ain't much if the average penis size is one country is 8cm flaccid and in another it's 9cm flaccid. In one country it's 14cm erect, in another it's 15cm erect. All countries have larger and smaller, and there's probably some great research around about extremes, but when it comes to the stock standard average dick, there's not a lot of difference.