The fact that CNS news, a conservative news outlet, frequently puts a black face on conservative ideology by using black commentators to promote their cause, does not mean that their position or purpose is any less biased. In this case, to again shift the focus from questionable actions on the part of some in law enforcement, which, the article grudgingly admits, occurs disproportionately MORE frequently to minorities, to a focus on black on black crime.
That being said, and notwithstanding the probable intent your contribution above, I will say that I agree, nevertheless. Hopefully BLM, the organization can do something about the numbers.
It may come as a surprise to you (and no doubt others here) that I am not without criticism of BLM, the organization. In fact, I've been critical of them before, in the Ferguson thread, and elsewhere.
On past occasions I've criticized them for allowing those, hell bent on discrediting them and in turn, the IDEA ITSELF, of black lives mattering TOO, the opportunity to do so when they are caught doing stupid s*** like chanting "Pigs in a blanket..." KNOWING that their detractors are going to take every opportunity (as we've seen of late) to discredit them, and the cause AS A WHOLE.
And I've criticized them for not being more visible (at the forefront) of addressing crime within the community. But my criticism doesn't end there.
Fact is, I think they've missed a GOLDEN opportunity to become INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS, as movers and motivators and PARTICIPANTS in this presidential election.
Instead, early in the year they chose to endorse NO ONE. Then (in August I think - months before the election) produced a rather nebulous "platform" that, among other "demands" included "reparations" (my opinion? fuck reparations) and "independent black political power." (?????) Then in late October, two members of BLM, DeRay McKesson and Brittany Packnett finally endorsed Hillary. WAY too little, and TOO fkng late, imo.
So, when Trump and company start with the nationwide stop and frisk policies and his racist attorney general looks the other way on civil rights violations, my message to BLM, the organization, and those minority voters who were "undecided", who endorsed no one, or who stayed home, is the SAME message Obama had for those who booed the Trump supporter in their midst: "DON'T BOO....... VOTE!"
So now you know the WHOLE story of my feelings about BLM, the organization.
The problem being, and hence, the REASON behind MY responses on the matter, is that in the minds of CONSERVATIVES, Republicans, bigots, and the like, Black lives matter - the CAUSE - the IDEA, and BLM, the organization, are ONE IN THE SAME.
Which is why THEY use the organization to discredit the CAUSE. And they discredit the cause because they reject the BASIS, the HISTORY, the documented EVIDENCE upon which it is founded. Which brings me back to the article you posted.
Williams is correct in writing, "... poor people are the most dependent on law and order." Which is PRECISELY why they need a police force they can TRUST. One that will treat them as if THEIR lives mattered as much as the richest among us.
It simply entails the expectation that the black motorist reaching for his driver's license, the black shopper playing with a b.b. gun in a Wal-Mart, or the black suspect found with a pocket knife, is going to be afforded the SAME consideration and due process as the white kid who stepped into a church and gunned down churchgoers, or the white sniper who shot two Pennsylvania state troopers, killing one. Consideration which DOESN'T entail killing someone reaching for his license, or driving to death someone locked in the back of a police van.