There's no question, even among many Republicans, that the G.W. Bush years were the worst in modern USA history.
Yeah, the link is busted.
While I tend to agree that a lot of this mess can be laid squarely at the feet of the Bush Administration I don't care.
Expending effort to clarify who is responsible detracts from effort expended to fix the problem. I don't really care who is at fault; my vote isn't earned by fingers pointing but rather by fingers... fixing."
I Saw a movie once put out by DuPont I believe -- the title??
"What we ARE is what we WERE, when!"
We stand on the shoulders of all those who came before us -- but in existentialist America because we don't "care" about who might be responsible for the situations we are currently in -- we learn NOTHING about avoiding future mistakes of the same type.
Sargon:
I've quoted your link above to the Maureen Dowd Op Ed piece in the NYTimes, again, hoping that more people will click on the link and read it. She, in my educated opinion, nails a major problem inherent in the USA mentality perfectly well. My experience during the last 20 years coincides with her estimation that the GOP and other conservatives have become champions of ignorance. A typical 20 year-old in Barcelona is better educated, better informed politically, and ready to participate fully in the stewardship of his or her city and province than a kid who may have graduated with honors from a public US school. The USA has certainly become a place where being dumb is considered attractive. I've only been back in Nevada for about a month and all I run into are illiterate (yes, they don't read because they find it boring) Barbi Doll types and young men more concerned about getting laid than achieving a successful career that may also contribute to the betterment of everyone.
Living abroad really spoils a person such as myself. I always come back to the USA expecting so much more.
"Yeah, the link is busted.
While I tend to agree that a lot of this mess can be laid squarely at the feet of the Bush Administration I don't care.
Expending effort to clarify who is responsible detracts from effort expended to fix the problem. I don't really care who is at fault; my vote isn't earned by fingers pointing but rather by fingers... fixing."
I Saw a movie once put out by DuPont I believe -- the title??
"What we ARE is what we WERE, when!"
We stand on the shoulders of all those who came before us -- but in existentialist America because we don't "care" about who might be responsible for the situations we are currently in -- we learn NOTHING about avoiding future mistakes of the same type.
What I mean by "I don't care" isn't "I don't feel like learning." I have an opinion on who is responsible for this mess... oh, hey, I even said so, but that to me is beside the point. Blaming the Bush Administration, repeatedly, over and over again- is that teaching someone something? Are we learning from perpetually finger pointing or just adding to gridlock, further pushing out the date that Congress accomplishes something of value to the American population?
There's been nothing but finger pointing in both directions. Figuring out who is to blame has been a central focus since this mess started. Do you feel like our governmental leaders have learned since it started and are avoiding future mistakes of the same type by railing on about the Bush Administration? Can't that be unspoken at this point?
Philosophically, I think you have a point. Practically speaking? Fingering pointing in the US isn't doing anyone any good... it certainly doesn't teach anyone anything. Greasing the wheel over tea is one thing. Rolling up your sleeves to get to work is something entirely different.
midlifebear said:The execs have abandoned the means of production in 'Mericuh for stuff manufactured for less money in other countries. Just try and find new kitchen appliances not made in Japan or China. Anyone know of an automatic coffee maker manufactured in the USA?
USA industry still has both feet firmly planted in the 1950s and the executive mindset is to import rather than retool and manufacture locally.
I don't understand this. How did this happen? No matter what you buy, a car, a television, a computer, a refrigerator, a washer/dryer... none of it was made in the US and if it was you've probably purchased something pretty crappy compared to what you likely could have gotten right around the same price. Why aren't American companies reverse engineering and then manufacturing better cars and computers and counter top microwaves? Wouldn't that help the economy? To have more factories with more workers producing goods that can be sold at even more competitive prices without all that importation excess?
Why is it so expensive to make things here? It wasn't always this way. At one point we were making things that people bought that weren't crap. What happened?
JSZ
The USA has certainly become a place where being dumb is considered attractive. I've only been back in Nevada for about a month and all I run into are illiterate (yes, they don't read because they find it boring) Barbi Doll types and young men more concerned about getting laid than achieving a successful career that may also contribute to the betterment of everyone.
Why is it so expensive to make things here? It wasn't always this way.
Seems to me you yourself are a prime exponent of labouring a point.Blaming the Bush Administration, repeatedly, over and over again- is that teaching someone something?...There's been nothing but finger pointing in both directions. Figuring out who is to blame has been a central focus since this mess started..... Do you feel like our governmental leaders have learned since it started and are avoiding future mistakes of the same type by railing on about the Bush Administration?
Man from the US does not understand how this happened? The US philosophy is PROFIT!I don't understand this. How did this happen?[industrial decline]
This happened in the UK too. Hell, in 1900 Winston Churchill was moaning that the US could make steam engines which were better, cheaper and could be supplied more quickly than ones made in England. In 2000 its you in the US moaning that Korea is making better, cheaper and delivered on time cars. In 1900 at least it was a bit more difficult to sent goods around the world (though the Uk grew on foreign trade too).none of it was made in the US and if it was you've probably purchased something pretty crappy compared to what you likely could have gotten right around the same price. Why aren't American companies reverse engineering and then manufacturing better cars and computers and counter top microwaves?
I can tell you the US shipbuilding industry trashed the UK because it introdiced new technology. Riveted ships gave way to welded ships. The uk shipbuilding industry had complex problems including two wars, which admittedly created great demand to replace sunk ships but also disrupted supplies and steady work and available labour so maybe it isnt quite fair to totally blame them. But how is the US shipbuilding now? It took the industry from us by adopting new technology. That is the trick.Why is it so expensive to make things here? It wasn't always this way.
too much profit taking and not enough investment?At one point we were making things that people bought that weren't crap. What happened?
Seems to me you yourself are a prime exponent of labouring a point.
Obama when he started out had what we would regard as a hung parliament because he could not guarantee to pass any legislation he wanted.
He is now well down into being a minority government reliant on the good will of his opponents to pass anything.
In this situation it is much more important to blame the other side. Firstly, you need to make it clear that you believe the compromises you are making are wrong and you are being forced to adop policies which have failed. Secondly you want to make it clear where the blame for this lies, with those who are forcing you to do this.
There is a serious issue here which the US is very hostile to. In order to make profitable goods you have to do whatever is necessary. This frequently means sacking people. The logic is that people are no longer needed to make things. Yet people still have to live. Society has to accept that for industry to continue there will be unemployment which is not the fault of those affected who must still be supported by society while this is going on.
I admit I go on about things, but Im not the one complaining about people doing this.A.) Talk about the pot calling the kettle black
I meant exponent.(unless this is a word which does not translate into american)A prime exponent? I'm sure there's a way that makes sense but I don't think that's the word you were looking for
No reason why not. Most sociologists or economists would say the similarities are much greater than the differences. The US may believe they are Gods own people, but they arent really. Many countries labour under this delusion. An irony that the Us does so when it abolished state religion.you labor under the impression that since it either happened, happens, worked, failed, or had a specific outcome in the UK, that's what will happen, work, fail or have the same specific outcome in the United States.
Dont they have this thing called a fillibuster which means it is possible to block legislation for as long as you can keep talking....years in the case of politicians. Then, the parties in the US are not nearly as cohesive as in the UK. In the Uk they vote as they are told. In the US this does not seem to be true. congressmen seem to believe they have a right to disagree with their party leader. (well, more precisely UK politicians do disagree and vote against their governments, but the system is designed to provide a large majority to the winner so it doesnt matter if a few rebel)When the President was elected his party controlled both houses of Congress. It wasn't until 2010 that the Democrats lost the House (but still maintained a smaller majority in the Senate.
Well perhaps he relies upon the ill will of his opponents but I dont see how I am wrong. He cannot pass legislation without agreement of the opposition. This virtually never happens in the UK. The US system is designed to creat logjams. The Uk system is designed to create dictators.That's not really accurate either. What we have is called divided government and it isn't all that uncommon. He doesn't have to rely on the goodwill of his opponents but he does have to compromise (or in the case of this President, make concessions)
It is my perception that Obama had no choice but to compromise if he wanted any healthcare legislation. is this true or false?Your strategy is "Republicans are mean to me?" Play ball with them but let the country know you're doing it under duress? We've been down this road already. Health Care is exactly what you're talking about. The President proposed a plan, republicans didn't like it, there was round after around "negotiation" and in the end the President said at press conference "This isn't what I wanted but this is what we got." That was the beginning of the "Please don't take my lunch money" Presidency.
Do you know? Why are there only two side? Especially in the US system which favours independents somewhat in a narrow majority congress. You would think that independents would have quite good prospects. Or is it really the case that independents go native and become rebels within a party. Hence although there are theoretically only two sides, in practice a side cannot be relied upon to vote together. Which brings us back to the question of whether obama ever had majority.We know who is to blame for things like that. This isn't exactly the plot from the first Mission Impossible- there are only two sides.
its what the people voted for... Maybe fundamentally the US system of government is not fit for purpose in the modern age. It tries to represent different groups but the way it does this, geographically, does not allow the views of people to be represented.It goes round and round and nothing ever gets done.
I meant there is a faction in the US which believes giving money to the unemployed is the greatest sin you could ever commit. That is indeed grim.I wouldn't mind a little clarification.... It sounds... well, grim. I think most countries are averse to unemployment in large numbers.
My point was there does not seem to be acceptance in the US that actually higher gas prices (via tax) is a good thing. Sure, phase it in, but the principle is it is the right action.(a steadily increased gas tax? Yes. Suddenly amping it to $10 a gallon? No)
US resistance to gas taxes is renowned the world over, and the justifications for this on grounds of distances travelled are understood. The world, however, sees this as stubborn refusal to see sense.just that you don't know about (through no fault of your own of course, you're not American) the nuances that are interlaced throughout our society.
as opposed to Buuuush who took a fat dump on the fabric and they have not manufactured enough Lysol and Spray And Wash to remove the stench and stain.The fact of the matter is that Obama is a skid mark on the fabric of this nation and it will be washed off in 2012.
as opposed to Buuuush who took a fat dump on the fabric and they have not manufactured enough Lysol and Spray And Wash to remove the stench and stain.
Obama just okay'd 1b for some more "green" companies. Shit if it don't work, throw more money at it!![]()