Blow Job Questions (Women/girls only)

[dolfette]

i feel the need to clarify my stance.

life is not black and white. men with a predilection for kids are not the devil incarnate, they are people with good and evil inside them...they are, like the rest of us, deciding how to behave by weighing up pros and cons, the rights and wrongs.
if they see posts by adults about enjoyable sexual experiences they had as children, it can only add weight to that side of the mental equation which tells them it's ok, she's enjoying it really. she won't be harmed. of course she's ready.

while i'm against knee-jerk laws that see parents arrested for baby-in-the-bath pics, i do think we should all be very aware and careful of the signals we send out there...especially online, where we have no idea who is reading our experiences. it's not the same as a private conversation among friends.

sometimes it only takes the weight of a feather to change someone's mind...to resist or to act.
what we say here does matter and the messages we send out are important.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

i feel the need to clarify my stance.

life is not black and white. men with a predilection for kids are not the devil incarnate, they are people with good and evil inside them...they are, like the rest of us, deciding how to behave by weighing up pros and cons, the rights and wrongs.
if they see posts by adults about enjoyable sexual experiences they had as children, it can only add weight to that side of the mental equation which tells them it's ok, she's enjoying it really. she won't be harmed. of course she's ready.

while i'm against knee-jerk laws that see parents arrested for baby-in-the-bath pics, i do think we should all be very aware and careful of the signals we send out there...especially online, where we have no idea who is reading our experiences. it's not the same as a private conversation among friends.

sometimes it only takes the weight of a feather to change someone's mind...to resist or to act.
what we say here does matter and the messages we send out are important.

Here, here. - And well said.

The main reason I avoid being specific about my own off-spring (other than the existence thereof) and also something I keep in mind when posting about my earlier sexual experiences, something which I generally avoid.

 

[dolfette]

Here, here. - And well said.

The main reason I avoid being specific about my own off-spring (other than the existence thereof) and also something I keep in mind when posting about my earlier sexual experiences, something which I generally avoid.

i'm always reassured when you agree with me.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

i'm always reassured when you agree with me.

As you should be. :approve:

 

[beachbum1971]

Thank you to all of my champions who have defended my honor. Being as this is an adult website, and no crimes were committed in my responses, I admit one thing, I had chosen to let this go as a difference of opinion.
However, I have just been insulted once again, and although Dolfette thrives on arguing and pushing buttons, my original point remains, if the only comments you have are negative, then I feel sorry for you for not being a happy person.
To respond on topic of a personal experience then then have it twisted into an interpretation of child pornography by someone with an overly active imagination and an argumentative nature is a bit over the top. I do agree that child pornography is vile, but I have a much different stance of answering a simple questionaire.
As for the pedifiles, and you know who you are, if this is all it took for you to get your jollies is by reading a post on an adult website, then it's better than trolling the playground for children. In other words, this whole argument is stretch, to say the least. My post was about 2 young consenting teenagers experimenting. It happens everyday in every country and is a reality, not a crime.
So, to all of my heros, as much as I know you are pushing for Dolfette and I to mud wrestle over this issue because that would be fun to watch, I think we are done here. I have much better things to do than argue with someone over a difference of opinion.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

So why bother posting that?

You make it sound a bit like 'I'm rubber, you're glue...'.

If you are leaving it, leave it.

 

[dolfette]

well actually i've decided to let it drop too...just as soon as i've called you a poopyhead and gotten in the last word.

this isn't about pushing buttons.
i reported these posts as soon as i saw them, but obviously the mods don't agree with me...fair enough, it's a debatable point.

but i'm not going to shut up and pull my head in over something like this. not now and not ever.

i say again, as adults we all have a responsibility to be more careful about what we're putting out there.

 

[Daisy]

1.Have you ever given a blowjob?
2

This question is really amusing to me. I mean seriously. Have you ever?... what is this jr. high? I mean really...

 

[Pitbull]

1.Have you ever given a blowjob?

No.
That was easy. :smile:
Done with the test!

 

[salthebb]

Dolfette, since you insist on spewing your ignorance, allow me to point out again that the scenario commented on by beachbum is NOT illegal. If you find it morally reprehensible, then so be it, but keep in mind, in the United States just because you don't like something does not mean it is illegal. Justice Potter Stewart said that he could not define pornography, he just knows it when he sees it. Now if one of the parties is a juvenile and the other an adult, a crime has been committed. If the act is filmed and shown, then it is a crime. But two juveniles, enjoying themselves is not illegal. If it was, then our detention homes would be filled to over flowing. I stand by my original statement, if you shoot off your piehole when you don't know what you are talking about then that is reprehensible, nauseating and vile. Report all you want to the moderators, but the last time I checked we are all entitled to our own opinion. You stated yours, and I replied that I thought you were totally wrong to condemn somebody for engaging in a normal, sexual activity. You jumped to the conclusion that a pedophile would get off on that post. Trust me as I work in the justice system, dealing with pedophiles. They are the lowest of the low and they would not come to this sight, read that post and get their rocks off. There are plenty of sights and chat rooms on the internet, unfortunately that cater to pedophiles. This is not one of them and for you to jump to that conclusion shows how naive you are. Don't accuse someone of something you know nothing about. Now this whole thing can rest.

 

[dolfette]

Dolfette, since you insist on spewing your ignorance, allow me to point out again that the scenario commented on by beachbum is NOT illegal. If you find it morally reprehensible, then so be it, but keep in mind, in the United States just because you don't like something does not mean it is illegal. Justice Potter Stewart said that he could not define pornography, he just knows it when he sees it. Now if one of the parties is a juvenile and the other an adult, a crime has been committed. If the act is filmed and shown, then it is a crime. But two juveniles, enjoying themselves is not illegal. If it was, then our detention homes would be filled to over flowing. I stand by my original statement, if you shoot off your piehole when you don't know what you are talking about then that is reprehensible, nauseating and vile. Report all you want to the moderators, but the last time I checked we are all entitled to our own opinion. You stated yours, and I replied that I thought you were totally wrong to condemn somebody for engaging in a normal, sexual activity. You jumped to the conclusion that a pedophile would get off on that post. Trust me as I work in the justice system, dealing with pedophiles. They are the lowest of the low and they would not come to this sight, read that post and get their rocks off. There are plenty of sights and chat rooms on the internet, unfortunately that cater to pedophiles. This is not one of them and for you to jump to that conclusion shows how naive you are. Don't accuse someone of something you know nothing about. Now this whole thing can rest.

yes, let's all let it rest...just as soon as you've got in the last word!

actually, two juvies enjoying themselves is illegal in the US and UK. if you really worked in the justice system you would know that.
that is why it is called the legal age of consent.
in the states teenagers have been placed on the sex offenders registary for it.

Girl, 13, charged as sex offender and victim - The Denver Post

...not that i agree with that hardline aproach, i think it's insane, but it nicely illustrates a blatant lie in your post, which makes your opinion worthless.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Dolfette, the true definition of vile is to comment on a subject on which you have insufficient information to form a knowledgeable opinion. In fact much of what is said on this website falls into that category. So unless you are an attorney, a social worker, a SANE nurse or anyone connected with the justice system that deals with child pornography, shut the hell up. You don't know what you are talking about and it is insulting to accuse someone of child porn, not to mention how it belittles the victims of child pornography.

Better to remain......

Well it's better when you take the advice of your own signature.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Thank you to all of my champions who have defended my honor. Being as this is an adult website, and no crimes were committed in my responses, I admit one thing, I had chosen to let this go as a difference of opinion.
However, I have just been insulted once again, and although Dolfette thrives on arguing and pushing buttons, my original point remains, if the only comments you have are negative, then I feel sorry for you for not being a happy person.
To respond on topic of a personal experience then then have it twisted into an interpretation of child pornography by someone with an overly active imagination and an argumentative nature is a bit over the top. I do agree that child pornography is vile, but I have a much different stance of answering a simple questionaire.
As for the pedifiles, and you know who you are, if this is all it took for you to get your jollies is by reading a post on an adult website, then it's better than trolling the playground for children. In other words, this whole argument is stretch, to say the least. My post was about 2 young consenting teenagers experimenting. It happens everyday in every country and is a reality, not a crime.
So, to all of my heros, as much as I know you are pushing for Dolfette and I to mud wrestle over this issue because that would be fun to watch, I think we are done here. I have much better things to do than argue with someone over a difference of opinion.

Go suck a dick, you're boring the hell out of the guys who are wanting to jack off.

You look like a weirdo calling the people who stood up for you posting your blow job stories "Heros"

I have a feeling you are going to be good material for all of us to read here at LPSG. To all of my "Champions" killed me with laughter. You sound like a campy actress spouting Shakespear. I'm sure all the dicks saluted with honor for you when they read that.

Hmmmm, a female who is attractive, sounds attractive, has photos, or has the potential to create fantasy in any horny guys head around HERE always gets support even if she is talking about her bowel movements. Come on, heros and champions? Please.

 

[SandraSmithCarver]

:tongue:

Go suck a dick, you're boring the hell out of the guys who are wanting to jack off.

You look like a weirdo calling the people who stood up for you posting your blow job stories "Heros"

I have a feeling you are going to be good material for all of us to read here at LPSG. To all of my "Champions" killed me with laughter. You sound like a campy actress spouting Shakespear. I'm sure all the dicks saluted with honor for you when they read that.

Hmmmm, a female who is attractive, sounds attractive, has photos, or has the potential to create fantasy in any horny guys head around HERE always gets support even if she is talking about her bowel movements. Come on, heros and champions? Please.

:tongue::biggrin1::wink:

 

[SpoiledPrincess]

What PM said - plus

You chose to make unfounded assumptions to get a sneer in, what did you expect? Then you go on to make a thread about how you're a nice girl and you want to do nice things for men, and other women are all horrible game players. Coincidence, I doubt it?

There are a few women on here who'll use any excuse to sneer and try to get the approval of the guys, when you're indulging some guys wanky desire to hear about the experience of kids do you really expect blanket approval?

If you're a woman on here you can, on the whole, be as unpleasant as you like, confess to a love of eating shit while lady jerking to disney porn and as long as you have naked photos some guys will go 'oh cool, you're a lovely lady'.

 

[AlteredEgo]

I'd also like to contradict salthebb. One of my close friends is an ephebophile. He is also a pedophile. This happened because he was molested and fucked by a married couple in his neighborhood from the time he was 5 until he was 15. His experience was that he thought he was in love with his abusers, and when they moved abruptly without saying goodbye, he never got closure. He's totally broken. While he does have a very healthy attraction to adults, he is also attracted to pre-pubescent girls, and adolescent girls. He would have been very titillated by the post everyone's discussing. I don't know that it would help him justify sleeping with some underaged girl, but I don't know that it wouldn't. If he's committed any crimes, he's never been caught. He goes out of his way to avoid being alone with young girls. He's trusted me enough to talk for many, many hours with me about his issues.

Many years ago, without knowing this part of his background, I did discuss in great detail the origins of my sexuality, and its expression. I went into these details with him because something I did during sex with him made him wonder if I had been abused as a child, like he had. He could barely contain his arousal at some parts. Dolfette absolutely makes a good point.

 

[dolfette]

thank you, ladies.

altered ego, that's a frightening and sad story.
i'm impressed by your compassion towards him...it is, after all, not his fault he has the feelings. i think you're a better person than i could be.
i hope he has the strength to always resist temptation.

 

[Velvet]

I think there is a lesson here.
Perhaps it is best to take the carpenters view.
To measure twice and cut once.
In truth we do not know who is lurking or what their sexual proclivities are.
A little discretion when entering into discussions about minors, even yourself as a minor is not such a bad thing.
Playing to the crowd and craving attention and approval from anonymous men by divulging underage sexual contact and then trying to justify it is sickening.
Please get some self respect.

 

[Gillette]

Wow.
The cranky cunt collective strikes again.
The CCC condemns a thread as wank fodder and additionally condemns any woman answering of having low self esteem. One of the women answering replies that she doesn't mind answering a wank thread and then is shredded over a tiny portion of her original post being possibly salacious for pedophiles. So now she's "vile". The CCC hath spoken.

Might I inquire why you crusaders for justice and light don't bring your righteousness to the other threads that are rife with mentions of early first times? Ones that actually go into detail beyond "no he didn't cum"? Not only have I seen significantly more detailed description of underage experiences, I've given one myself and not been jumped on for it. Altered Ego's post gives much more detail of a far younger person being abused by adults, yet she is thanked for her contribution... but "14/15/no" is dangerously close to exciting a pedophile? Where the fuck is your perspective?

Frankly from where I'm sitting it looks like the CCC only jumped on beachbum for

I'm really surprised at how negative the women who don't like giving head have been on this thread.

being as it's the first item addressed by any of you, including Dolfette who only raised the age thing as an afterthought. Speaking of which, had you actually read the post you're so offended by, D, you'd have a) gotten her age right and b) not mentioned her swallowing as she stated he didn't cum.

 

[dolfette]

you're absolutely right!

it was this post:
http://www.lpsg.org/2536327-post18.html
where the girl was 15 and swallowed.

she was 14 and didn't.

yes, there will be guys who get off on that info.

...an afterthought? hardly! i reported those posts as soon as i'd read the content.

you really think all these people are only posting these concerns to be bitchy to her because she likes turning guys on? seriously?? that this could be the only possible reason why people would object?

if you think that then, frankly, i've no idea what to say to you...