Boob size

[wallyj84]

Isn't that redundant? I mean, if they are natural...

Not at all. Some women have natural breasts that are obscenely large. Large to the point of being gross. Those breasts aren't at all sensible.

 

[BetterFuture]

Some women have natural breasts that are obscenely large. Large to the point of being gross.

Not for me. I like all sizes of natural breasts. And I like nicely done implants... even big implants... BUT, I don't like the "no human woman ever had breasts this big" implants... when it looks like two beach balls were stuff under her skin by an unethical doc, that's gross.

 

[find83]

Not for me. I like all sizes of natural breasts. And I like nicely done implants... even big implants... BUT, I don't like the "no human woman ever had breasts this big" implants... when it looks like two beach balls were stuff under her skin by an unethical doc, that's gross.

Sooooo True man. For me it has more to do with how it fits her body than actual liking a particular a cup size

 

[AlteredEgo]

Not at all. Some women have natural breasts that are obscenely large. Large to the point of being gross. Those breasts aren't at all sensible.

If they are natural, they are as intended, and automatically sensible, provided they aren't hurting her. Your dislike of them is irrelevant.

 

[wallyj84]

If they are natural, they are as intended, and automatically sensible, provided they aren't hurting her. Your dislike of them is irrelevant.

I think we should define sensible in this context.

 

[wallyj84]

Not for me. I like all sizes of natural breasts. And I like nicely done implants... even big implants... BUT, I don't like the "no human woman ever had breasts this big" implants... when it looks like two beach balls were stuff under her skin by an unethical doc, that's gross.

I find that kind of thing gross as well, but I can't say that it is objectively more gross than some of the natural breasts I've seen in my life. At a certain point it's a matter of taste.

Personally, I think all breasts past a certain size just look silly. That's just me though.

 

[AlteredEgo]

I think we should define sensible in this context.

The dictionary has already done that for you. You and the other fella are the ones who don't know what the word means. It is perfectly sensible to be naturally formed and decline to alter one's shape cosmetically. It is also reasonable. It is sane. It is also rational. Natural is, by definition, realistic. So, even taking common synonyms into consideration, you're still incorrect. It's not my fault you two seemingly want to hyperbolize the word ''sensible".

Annnnnnd, I'm done.
sensible: definition from Dictionary.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sensible


For an ironic laugh, see the third definition.

 

[wallyj84]

The dictionary has already done that for you. You and the other fella are the ones who don't know what the word means. It is perfectly sensible to be naturally formed and decline to alter one's shape cosmetically. It is also reasonable. It is sane. It is also rational. Natural is, by definition, realistic. So, even taking common synonyms into consideration, you're still incorrect. It's not my fault you two seemingly want to hyperbolize the word ''sensible".

Annnnnnd, I'm done.
sensible: definition from Dictionary.com: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sensible


For an ironic laugh, see the third definition.

Sensible, as you're using it, is the first definition, "having, using, or showing good sense or sound judgment". What is or is not a "sound judgement" has to do with the human mind and its perception of what it is a good or bad decision. In order to make a decision you need a conscious mind capable of choice. Nature doesn't have that. At least not in any way that can be proven scientifically. So nature can't be sensible in the way you're talking about. Nature can only be sensible in relation to how human beings choose to perceive and react to it.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Sensible, as you're using it, is the first definition, "having, using, or showing good sense or sound judgment". What is or is not a "sound judgement" has to do with the human mind and its perception of what it is a good or bad decision. In order to make a decision you need a conscious mind capable of choice. Nature doesn't have that. At least not in any way that can be proven scientifically. So nature can't be sensible in the way you're talking about. Nature can only be sensible in relation to how human beings choose to perceive and react to it.

You've misinterpreted me. The woman does have a mind. There is nothing senseless about her choosing to just live in the body she was born into. Therefore, her natural breasts can be nothing but sensible. Think of it (as far as usage) like the phrase sensible shoes. This usage implies practicality. You know what's not practical? Elective surgery. You know what's sensible? Living with your tits.

 

[693987]

You've misinterpreted me. The woman does have a mind. There is nothing senseless about her choosing to just live in the body she was born into. Therefore, her natural breasts can be nothing but sensible. Think of it (as far as usage) like the phrase sensible shoes. This usage implies practicality. You know what's not practical? Elective surgery. You know what's sensible? Living with your tits.

Those who opt for a reduction for their own preferences, health, etc are equally sensible in my opinion..

 

[AlteredEgo]

Those who opt for a reduction for their own preferences, health, etc are equally sensible in my opinion..

Medical reasons are not elective. Elective surgery is, by definition, not practical. However, you're right, that doesn't make it senseless.

 

[693987]

Medical reasons are not elective. Elective surgery is, by definition, not practical. However, you're right, that doesn't make it senseless.

That's why I also said preferences and etcetera to include things outside of strictly medical reasons. Basically I'm of a mind that nature for the most part is pretty dang sensible about the tits it gives people. That being said, I think there are also still sensible reasons for altering what nature gave you too.

 

[AlteredEgo]

That's why I also said preferences and etcetera to include things outside of strictly medical reasons. Basically I'm of a mind that nature for the most part is pretty dang sensible about the tits it gives people. That being said, I think there are also still sensible reasons for altering what nature gave you too.

Absolutely.

 

[PaSCHa]

Anything bigger than C's are fine to me.

 

[Holly Doors]

If they are natural, they are as intended, and automatically sensible, provided they aren't hurting her. Your dislike of them is irrelevant.

Absolutely hunni, I'm very large and natural, I wear a 44 HH sometimes a J in some makes. I look apon it that that's what I've been given and wouldn't alter that, with the right underwear they don't cause me discomfort so all's well. people should love their bodies and respect others imo! X

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

I always wanted big breasts. Now that I have them, it's hard on my neck and shoulders. But I love them so much I wouldn't want to have them reduced. I wouldn' want breast scars....i don't scar well at all. I end up with keloids.

 

[Holly Doors]

Are you natural @Tattooed Goddess ?

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

Yes. I put on weight and got boobies. Not to mention I'm on high doses of estrogen which give you bigger breasts and more curves.

 

[Holly Doors]

That's great @Tattooed Goddess , sorry to hear you're getting a little pain. I've been lucky I guess especially my size, I've always tried to wear the best bras I could afford tho which I think has helped greatly.

 

[chetthebaker]

Yes. I put on weight and got boobies. Not to mention I'm on high doses of estrogen which give you bigger breasts and more curves.

Did you go up a cup size from weight/estrogen?