Brett Kavanaugh

[Andyb2]

The Dems had the letter soon after it was written by CBF, which was on 30 July or so, Finstein had it at least early Aug.

On Sep 13th she says she has referred it to Federal investigating authorities.

On Sep 14, Mark Judge the other person named in the room says "It's just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way," Judge told TWS.

Also 35 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school wrote
“We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983. For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect. We strongly believe it is important to convey this information to the Committee at this time.”

I don’t think Cuomo has anyone who did that for him.

So it’s not like the FBI only had three days or whatever to investigate.

And what else are they likely to gain by interviewing CBF after she testifies?

This is all smoke and mirrors.

A senate judiciary hearing isn’t a thorough investigation? It seems to have been done to death.

 

[Jjz1109]

The Cuomo Report. Just goes to show what can happen with a legitimate, thorough investigation.

Especially with 179 witnesses interviewed, and 74,000 pieces of evidence!

 

[Industrialsize]

Especially with 179 witnesses interviewed, and 74,000 pieces of evidence!

How many witness interviews were in the Kavanaugh report?

 

[Andyb2]

If you’re complaining that the FBI didn’t investigate - aren’t they meant to investigate Federal Crimes? Or multiple cross border incidents. Sure they do background checks, but nothing was reported until 40 years later and after they conducted their checks. The investigation should be a state police job. CBF is an educated woman - I’m sure she knows how it works - she knew to write a letter to her political contacts.

 

[Andyb2]

How many witness interviews were in the Kavanaugh report?

Which report specifically are you referring to?

 

[Andyb2]

How many witness interviews were in the Kavanaugh report?

Besides, according to CBF there were only 3 people in the room and She describes the event as a "gathering" with her and four other people. So a total of five people.

Why do you needn’t a thousand interviews for the matter. How can 4,500 tips be related to the incident rather than deranged lefties ringing up?

We have seen testimony from CBF and Kavanaugh etc and the denials that it happened by two other people who were there as named by CBF.

Anything more is beating a dead horse and grasping at straws.

Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.

So, if this happened at some time to CBF that’s terrible, but in regards to Kavanaugh being involved - there’s two other witnesses who say that never happened!

 

[Industrialsize]

Besides, according to CBF there were only 3 people in the room and She describes the event as a "gathering" with her and four other people. So a total of five people.

Why do you needn’t a thousand interviews for the matter. How can 4,500 tips be related to the incident rather than deranged lefties ringing up?

We have seen testimony from CBF and Kavanaugh etc and the denials that it happened by two other people who were there as named by CBF.

Anything more is beating a dead horse and grasping at straws.

Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.

So, if this happened at some time to CBF that’s terrible, but in regards to Kavanaugh being involved - there’s two other witnesses who say that never happened!

Why did the FBI neglect to contact or interview Ms. Blakey Ford?

 

[Andyb2]

Why did the FBI neglect to contact or interview Ms. Blakey Ford?

What’s it matter? doesn’t change the outcome of the veracity of Kavanaughs suitability for appointment.
It’s not a federal offence so not for them to investigate. She apparently wanted to stay anonymous for quite some time, maybe she didn’t actually wanted to be interviewed. Do the FBI need to publish conversations it has with people to satisfy our curiosity?
Maybe they spoke with Judge and CBF’s other friend and worked out the story has no actual merit regarding Kavanaugh.

Ultimately we heard her story, (no credibility towards blaming Kavanaugh), heard from the witnesses who didn’t witness anything, Kavanaughs very clear denial and a large number of women who knew him at the time and since that time who said allegation is completely out of character. Pretty simple case closed. if Ginsburg didn’t have issue with him no one else should either.

 

[deleted6681271]

Why did the FBI neglect to contact or interview Ms. Blakey Ford?

they interviewed her multiple times.

 

[Industrialsize]

What’s it matter? doesn’t change the outcome of the veracity of Kavanaughs suitability for appointment.
It’s not a federal offence so not for them to investigate. She apparently wanted to stay anonymous for quite some time, maybe she didn’t actually wanted to be interviewed. Do the FBI need to publish conversations it has with people to satisfy our curiosity?
Maybe they spoke with Judge and CBF’s other friend and worked out the story has no actual merit regarding Kavanaugh.

Ultimately we heard her story, (no credibility towards blaming Kavanaugh), heard from the witnesses who didn’t witness anything, Kavanaughs very clear denial and a large number of women who knew him at the time and since that time who said allegation is completely out of character. Pretty simple case closed. if Ginsburg didn’t have issue with him no one else should either.

they interviewed her multiple times.

Politics
Lawyers for accuser of Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh blast FBI for not interviewing her or judge

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/fbi...-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford.html
Key Points

• The FBI does not plan to interview Christine Blasey Ford, the first of three women who last month publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
  

The lawyers, Michael Bromwich and Debra Katz, in a letter to the FBI, said that since Friday they have offered the bureau’s agents a sit-down with Ford, identified witnesses and evidence and asked for the identity of the agent in charge of the probe.

“Despite these efforts, we have received no response from anyone involved in this investigation, and no response to our offer for Dr. Ford to be interviewed,” the lawyers wrote. “This afternoon, we learned of media reports that the FBI does not intend to interview either Dr. Ford or Judge Kavanaugh.”

“We hope this reporting is inaccurate. It is inconceivable that the FBI could conduct a thorough investigation of Dr. Ford’s allegations without interviewing her, Judge Kavanaugh, or the witnesses we have identified in our letters to you,” the letter said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/fbi...-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford.html

 

[Andyb2]

Politics
Lawyers for accuser of Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh blast FBI for not interviewing her or judge

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/fbi...-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford.html
Key Points

• The FBI does not plan to interview Christine Blasey Ford, the first of three women who last month publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

The lawyers, Michael Bromwich and Debra Katz, in a letter to the FBI, said that since Friday they have offered the bureau’s agents a sit-down with Ford, identified witnesses and evidence and asked for the identity of the agent in charge of the probe.

“Despite these efforts, we have received no response from anyone involved in this investigation, and no response to our offer for Dr. Ford to be interviewed,” the lawyers wrote. “This afternoon, we learned of media reports that the FBI does not intend to interview either Dr. Ford or Judge Kavanaugh.”

“We hope this reporting is inaccurate. It is inconceivable that the FBI could conduct a thorough investigation of Dr. Ford’s allegations without interviewing her, Judge Kavanaugh, or the witnesses we have identified in our letters to you,” the letter said.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/02/fbi...-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford.html

You’ve quoted me but not replied to anything I’ve said really. What benefit is there now that she’s given testimony?

 

[Klingsor]

MSNBC is now officially the All Cuomo, All the Time network.

It's too bad liberals won't pay attention to sexual misconduct by Democrats.

 

[Andyb2]

It’s taken a long time.

 

[chicagosam]

MSNBC is now officially the All Cuomo, All the Time network.

It's too bad liberals won't pay attention to sexual misconduct by Democrats.

I thought that after Donald Trump normalized being a sexual predator it was deemed appropriate behavior for the right and left.

 

[Jjz1109]

MSNBC is now officially the All Cuomo, All the Time network.

It's too bad liberals won't pay attention to sexual misconduct by Democrats.

Only when the evidence, and number of witnesses, is overwhelming and indisputable. 74,000 pieces of evidence, and 179 witnesses, is hard to ignore. There is no other choice for them than to acknowledge. Would be political suicide. Took a long time.

 

[Andyb2]

Awesome contribution there @chicagosam

 

[Industrialsize]

Only when the evidence, and number of witnesses, is overwhelming and indisputable. 74,000 pieces of evidence, and 179 witnesses, is hard to ignore. There is no other choice for them than to acknowledge. Would be political suicide. Took a long time.

How many witness interviews were in the Kavanaugh report?

 

[Andyb2]

How many witness interviews were in the Kavanaugh report?

There were only 3-4 people that could have had any meaningful input and we heard from them all.

So, besides the testimonies very publicly given what motherhood statements that are meaningless would you like to make about what else the FBI should have done.

 

[chrisrobin]

Its really good that when you want to cause any sort of fuss you politicize it first.
Rape and sexual advances do not happen according to a persons political view.
Regardless of the person if the evidence is there to charge them charge them and if found guilty then pay the price.
While Kavanaugh was a political nominee his overall interrogation was cut short. The process was shortened.
Regardless of the claims made against him these investigations were cut short by the President for political gain.
Don't muddy the waters with possible sexual misdemeanours from the Democrats - the decision to push the appointment was made wholly by the Republicans.
Nothing can be done I don't think to reverse the appointment but there is need to follow through the evidence to prove either one way or the other whether Trump circumnavigated due process on ascertaining if Kavanaugh did have a clean slate and was "pure" enough to become a High Court Justice. Any and all claims against him should have been investigated fully and without fear of presidential interference - as it was the Justice Department was in Trumps pocket so whatever he said went so that the rule of law was bent to accommodate the wishes of one man.
Andy will complain the evidence wasn't there and its a witch hunt and that Kavanaugh was pure as snow and Trump a pinnacle of righteousness = but until there is a proper investigation then the facts will never be known and the Democrats would be justified in shouting "the election (of our candidate) was stolen" - or perhaps Andy would prefer that nothing to do with Trump and his cohorts was ever investigated and that those responsible for the 6 Jan insurgence should remain free and uncharged - sorry, but like introducing Cuomo top this debate another red herring wont change the fact that Kavanaugh was not fully vetted on the orders of Trump aided and abetted by his henchman McConnell.

 

[Andyb2]

Kavanaugh was not fully vetted on the orders of Trump aided and abetted by his henchman McConnell.

And you hypocritically have this allegation proven on what? ‘CNN opinion pieces’?

The public inquiry has shown the complaint against Kavanaugh is without substance. It’s hard for you hard to admit your wrong, I can see that. But perhaps it’s time to accept the actual testimony given and the denials of everyone involved (except CBF) that no such incident happened between CBF & Kavanaugh.

When you have CBF’s lifelong friend who didn’t want Kavanaugh nominated, show integrity and resist (unlawful?) pressure to say otherwise - the conclusion must surely be accepted.

This whole conversation is repetitive to the point of being meaningless posting any further here.