B_henry miller
Expert Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Posts
- 2,917
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 175
- Points
- 193
- Location
- Big Sur, California
- Gender
- Male
A friend said to me, "Why do they need labels like that? You used to just have friends."
I think that gay visibility, while a good thing, has made men more needing to label their relationships. Back when gays were invisible, the idea that anyone would be openly gay was unthinkable; and so the fear that others may perceive your close friendship with your friend as "gay" was unthinkable. Today, it's not unthinkable to be gay. I think this makes some people needing to label their relationships with labels like "bromance."
Frankly, a "bromance" to me just sounds like a gay relationship but without the sex. It sounds like an emotional affair.
I think that gay visibility, while a good thing, has made men more needing to label their relationships. Back when gays were invisible, the idea that anyone would be openly gay was unthinkable; and so the fear that others may perceive your close friendship with your friend as "gay" was unthinkable. Today, it's not unthinkable to be gay. I think this makes some people needing to label their relationships with labels like "bromance."
Frankly, a "bromance" to me just sounds like a gay relationship but without the sex. It sounds like an emotional affair.