Bush pressured to explain domestic spying

Discussion in 'Et Cetera, Et Cetera' started by HotBulge, Jun 21, 2007.

  1. HotBulge

    Gold Member

    Jul 27, 2005
    Likes Received:
    Lowells talk to Cabots, Cabots talk to God
    Bush under new pressure to explain domestic spying

    By Thomas Ferraro2 hours, 7 minutes ago

    President George W. Bush faced new pressure on Thursday to explain the legal basis for his warrantless domestic spying program when a Senate panel authorized subpoenas to obtain administration documents.
    The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the subpoenas in a 13-3 vote following 18 months of futile efforts to obtain documents related to Bush's contested legal justification for the program, which was implemented after the September 11 attacks.
    Three Republicans joined 10 Democrats in voting to authorize the subpoenas, which may be issued within days unless the White House suddenly provides the materials voluntarily.
    "We have been in the dark too long," said Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. "The stonewalling is unacceptable and must end."
    The action sets up another possible courtroom showdown between the White House and the Democratic-led Congress, which has vowed to unveil how the tight-lipped Republican administration operates.
    Last week, congressional committees subpoenaed two of Bush's former aides in a separate investigation into the firing last year of nine of the 93 U.S. attorneys.
    Bush could challenge the subpoenas, citing a right of executive privilege that his predecessors have invoked with mixed success to keep certain materials private and prevent aides from testifying.
    Bush authorized warrantless surveillance of persons inside the United States with suspected ties to terrorists shortly after the attacks of September 11, 2001. The program, conducted by the National Security Agency, became public in 2005.
    Critics charge the program violated the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act which requires warrants. Bush claimed he could act without warrants under war-time powers.
    In January, the administration abandoned the program and agreed to get approval of the FISA court for its electronic surveillance. But Bush and Democrats still are at odds over revisions he wants in the FISA law.
    "The White House ... stubbornly refuses to let us know how it interprets the current law and the perceived flaws that led it to operate a program outside the process established by FISA for more than five years," Leahy said.
    Interest in the legal justification of the program soared last month after former Deputy Attorney General James Comey gave dramatic testimony about a March 2004 hospital-room meeting in which then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales tried to pressure a critically ill John Ashcroft, who was attorney general, to set aside concerns and sign a presidential order reauthorizing the program.
    With top Justice Department officials threatening to resign, Bush quietly quelled the uprising by directing the department to take steps to bring the program in line with the law, Comey said.
    Leahy noted that when Gonzales, now attorney general, appeared before the panel on February 6, he was asked if senior department officials had voiced reservations about the program.
    "I do not believe that these DoJ (department) officials ... had concerns about this program," Leahy quoted Gonzales as saying. Leahy added, "The committee and the American people deserve better."

    Copyright © 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice