Bush supporters who are gay?

What do people think of Bush?


  • Total voters
    52

deepwader

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Posts
216
Media
4
Likes
47
Points
248
Age
56
Location
Cumbria (England)
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Actually, MEM0101, bondage is not my thing.

I am not a student of US political history but I think you will find that almost every President since FDR has plumbed new depth in the approval ratings (the exception of which I am aware being Ford -- not surprising given his short tenure and his predecessor's travails) And presidents' ratings INVARIABLY fare worse in second terms.
 

fortiesfun

Sexy Member
Joined
May 29, 2006
Posts
4,619
Media
0
Likes
77
Points
268
Location
California (United States)
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I am not a student of US political history but I think you will find that almost every President since FDR has plumbed new depth in the approval ratings (the exception of which I am aware being Ford -- not surprising given his short tenure and his predecessor's travails) And presidents' ratings INVARIABLY fare worse in second terms.
The latter fact is true, the first is not.
 

Mem

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Posts
7,912
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
183
Location
FL
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
. Bozo, and Bart Simpson could have beaten Gore and Kerry. And really he didn't even beat Gore, so there you go.

Are you trying to trick us? There already is a clown with a child's mentality in the White house and he did beat both Gore and Kerry.
 

Mem

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Posts
7,912
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
183
Location
FL
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
. Bozo, and Bart Simpson could have beaten Gore and Kerry. And really he didn't even beat Gore, so there you go.

Are you trying to trick us? There already is a clown with child's mentality in the White House, and he did beat Gore and Kerry. (well he stole the election, anyway.)
 

B_RedDude

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
1,929
Media
0
Likes
82
Points
183
Location
California
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Are there any gay guys or girls who support bush even though he is against gay marriage and acts like being gay is immoral and irresponsible?I can't stand him and I am a democrat also so that goes without saying doesn't it.:tongue: Does any one who is Bi or other consider him a good president?Is there any one who is gay who actually respects Bush and looks up to him.Like that old tootsie pop commercial:The World May Never Know!:biggrin1: :dunno: :yikes:please do not make a mountain out of a mole hill about this I urge everyone .I know politics are a very touchy area.I have a friend who is republican and we butt heads at times about that issue.Once again it is a question that I ponder nothing more nothing less.

In my not so humble opinion, anyone who EVER supported the evil clown, gay or straight, seriously needs to have their head examined.
 

BurningVenus

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Posts
328
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
161
Location
East Coast
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Bush should be impeached and prosecuted for war crimes and treason. He should rot in a blistering, filthy Texas jail cell until his last day on earth. Then he should be hanged at dawn and. . . . . :censored:

What was the question? Oh yes, I know a gay man who loves Dubya, but he's closeted and his politics may be disingenuous.
 

Dockerking

Just Browsing
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Posts
19
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Location
LA
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
How about that he has the lowest approval rating of any president in modern history, and has managed to sustain it longer than any president has sustained his lowest score? By that reasonably objective standard he is absolutely the worst.


"Reasonably objective Standard?" A poll? Shortly after 9/11 his approval rating was in the 80's. Was he then one of our greatest presidents?
 

B_RedDude

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
1,929
Media
0
Likes
82
Points
183
Location
California
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
George Bush may not be numbered amongst the United States' greatest Presidents but he is better than his lying, perjuring predecessor and - the only really important point here - better than either of the opponents whom he defeated. The choice was never between Bush and some heraclean model of intellect and principle - the alternatives realistically on offer were Gore and Kerry, either of whom would have beggared the nation's economy and subordinated its interests to those of the so-called "United Nations"


I am continually astonished that so many gay men are prepared to allow their sexual preferences to rule their attitude to politics and politicians. The tail is surely wagging the dog. There is more to a President than his views on gay marriage: we are talking about the most powerful office on earth. Would be okay to have an out and out socialist President provided that he endorsed gay rights? It's okay, is it, that your partner loses his job, and your taxes rise to the point where you can't afford to keep that nice home you bought together, provided that you can get a piece of paper from the government that says you are "married"? Fine, then: Obama for President!

I used to point out to my gay friends who hated Margaret Thatcher as much as I supported her, that a penny off the rate of income tax did more to increase the personal freedom of an employed gay man, than a year off the unequal legal age of consent which had not in fact been enforced for twenty years. The way the government impinges on our lives most seriously is by taking our money and spending it. A liberal government is a government that grabs less of our cash.

Most important of all: Bush was right to go to war in Iraq and the successful prosecution of the war is vital to the defence of western liberal society, particularly the rights of gays and women, against Islamic fascism. The Islamists are watching to see if we flinch in Iraq and if we do, I fear for our future. I am grateful to every US soldier fighting that war and all those who are supporting them.

I am gay and I don't give a SHIT about gay marriage -- but you are seriously deluded -- not only is your head, but your heart is in the wrong place. Your cold materialism is disgusting and you show a WOEFUL ignorance of the entire Iraq matter.

Many of us have reason to be fearful of the future BECAUSE THIS WAR WAS INITIATED IN THE FIRST PLACE, by two self-superior Anglo countries (not to mention the asinine views on the war of the Prime Minister of Australia, another ANGLO country)

Why don't you join your recently departed idiot Prime Minister on the shit pile where you both belong?
 

kalipygian

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Posts
1,948
Media
31
Likes
139
Points
193
Age
68
Location
alaska
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
How about that he has the lowest approval rating of any president in modern history, and has managed to sustain it longer than any president has sustained his lowest score? By that reasonably objective standard he is absolutely the worst.

Yes.

He is the biggest embarassment to the country in my lifetime(53).

I don't recall Americans ever being so embarrassed by the person who represents to the them to the world that they pretended to be Canadians when abroad.

Re the OP, I don't know anyone of any orientation, party or persuasion who admits to supporting him. He is incompetent on all levels.
 

guy1524

Just Browsing
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Posts
19
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
146
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
hey. i maylike sucking and gttin fucked by cocks but i dont support gay marriage thats just 2 faR 4 ME i just do it for fun...
 

kalipygian

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Posts
1,948
Media
31
Likes
139
Points
193
Age
68
Location
alaska
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
You would be hard pressed to find a Brit that doesnt think he's an arse...

Appears to be a bit of an improvement, your new PM seems to be excercizing a bit of independance.

Re others' question re DOMA, it passed 85-14 in the senate, 342-67 in the house, so Clinton could not have successfully vetoed it, but I do not excuse him for signing it.
Those numbers also mean quite a few Dems, in the vicinity of half, voted for it, violating (among other things) the party platform.

I can not think of a single ex president who would not be an improvement. (if resurrected)

Regarding history, it is sometimes curious how differently things turn out to viewed by succeeding generations with the benefit of a later and longer perspective. Reputations are more apt to fall than rise. With so much more information so widely available, it will no longer happen that there is a limit to one version of events by those in power, presenting themselves in the best possible way.
It is likely that in the next few years, many of the present abused will be tried.
 

Bbucko

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Posts
7,232
Media
8
Likes
322
Points
208
Location
Sunny SoFla
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Bush is a lying, dimwitted idiot who claims to have a direct line of communication with God.

Yet despite this "connection" with his faith, he has allowed the execution of the retarded while gov of Texas and refused to even review the other capital cases for new DNA evidence (where it exonerated many convicts on death row in other states).

But perhaps the worst thing he's done is to codify torture into American foreign/defence/intelligence policy. It will take a lifetime to undo that damage to our national honor.

The fact that he's a homophobic religious zealot seems almost forgivable in comparison.
 

SlimGuySB

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Posts
320
Media
5
Likes
40
Points
163
Location
Santa Barbara, CA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Bush was right to go to war in Iraq and the successful prosecution of the war is vital to the defence of western liberal society, particularly the rights of gays and women, against Islamic fascism.

You do realise that the Iraq had one of the best records for womens rights in the region don't you? Just one of the many, many reasons that Saddam and the Talliban didn't see eye to eye...
 

dcwrestlefan

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Posts
1,215
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
183
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
i don't get the "log cabin republicans" thing, but they are a minority within a minority.

bush is not popular in the gay world, or anywhere else for that matter.
 

deepwader

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Posts
216
Media
4
Likes
47
Points
248
Age
56
Location
Cumbria (England)
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
You do realise that the Iraq had one of the best records for womens rights in the region don't you? Just one of the many, many reasons that Saddam and the Talliban didn't see eye to eye...

That is not even remotely relevant to what I said, which related to contemporary perception of the war and the likely effect of failing to prosecute it effectively.

Another poster bangs on about "Anglo" countries and he is right to do so. It is highly significant that it is the countries that share the common law and the English language are the ones that have chosen, for the second time in a century, to stand up to fascism rather than seek to cut a deal with it.

Isalmic radicalisation does not post-date the invasion of Iraq. Radical preachers have been active in the UK - especially on college campuses - for more than ten years. These people regard western liberal society as terminally decadent; they are determined to extinguish the values we hold and they are ready to accomplish this by force.

Iraq's place in this? That no WMD were found is not proof that none existed, though I accept is it highly persuasive. What cannot be disputed are Saddam's ambitions, plans and attempts to produce or procure nuclear weapons which without effective intervention would eventually have succeeded. Once ejected from Afghanistan, where were Al Qaeda going to settle?



Iraq was also to some extent a "target of opportunity" -- the state against whom ate least SOME western opinion could be mobilized. You gotta start somewhere!

It is to the credit of Bush and those around this that he perceived the need to fight this war. It is to his serious discredit that the war has been to say the least ineptly fought, with too little preparation for the aftermath of invasion - but the prescriptions offered by various opponents would not at this time improve the position: they would make it worse. Supporting Bush is therefore the only game in town and regretfully that is what I must do.

As to the tawdry comments about money: money is simply what we use to run our lives. Having a proportion of it grabbed by the government for ITS purposes, diminishes our ability to achieve OUR purposes as individuals whether that is handing it over to famine relief or spending it on big-dick porn. I simply believe in expanding the sphere of individual choice, by restricting the sphere of state choice. Now, who was it who said: "It's the economy, stupid!" ?