C-IN2 Grower/Shower Breifs

skippy_1314

Just Browsing
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Posts
38
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
151
Location
Chicago, IL
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Has anyone tried the Personal Fit Factor briefs from C-IN2? There is a shower and a grower. The pouch is supposed to accommodate as needed. Just wondering what reviews are from guys that have tried them.
 

D_Percy_Prettywillie

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Posts
748
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
53
C-IN2 rank low in my overall hierarchy of underwear because of the material they use. It's mostly cotton, which is fine for FTLs (-_-) but unacceptable for the $15-60 dollar pair of designer underwear that one can easily shell out.

For one thing, the colors don't stay vibrant very long with 95% Cotton/5% Elastane construction. The second thing is that they don't "breathe" the way they should or could were they made with a nylon pouch. The other thing is that these, like the 2(xist) line from C-in2, have too much fabric from leg opening to waist band. That's great if you have an unusually long crotch area, intend to sag and want to show off the waist band of your briefs, or enjoy that old timey grandpa's underwear fit. Most people don't though so beware.

They got it right with the interior cup (as opposed to their sling designed underwear) though. In an overall underwear shoot out?

I'd give these a 2 out of 10.

If they were only stacked against other C-in2 briefs? I'd give them a little bit higher mark for getting right what they did.

3 out of 10.

JSZ​
 

HotBulge

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Posts
2,331
Media
108
Likes
17,248
Points
518
Age
34
Location
Lowells talk to Cabots, Cabots talk to God
Gender
Male
Well said. I wholeheartedly agree about C-IN2. They are nice eye-candy for the first use, but aren't worth the price afterwards.

C-IN2 rank low in my overall hierarchy of underwear because of the material they use. It's mostly cotton, which is fine for FTLs (-_-) but unacceptable for the $15-60 dollar pair of designer underwear that one can easily shell out.

For one thing, the colors don't stay vibrant very long with 95% Cotton/5% Elastane construction. The second thing is that they don't "breathe" the way they should or could were they made with a nylon pouch. The other thing is that these, like the 2(xist) line from C-in2, have too much fabric from leg opening to waist band. That's great if you have an unusually long crotch area, intend to sag and want to show off the waist band of your briefs, or enjoy that old timey grandpa's underwear fit. Most people don't though so beware.

They got it right with the interior cup (as opposed to their sling designed underwear) though. In an overall underwear shoot out?

I'd give these a 2 out of 10.

If they were only stacked against other C-in2 briefs? I'd give them a little bit higher mark for getting right what they did.

3 out of 10.

JSZ​