hung said:Does this qualify as Cock Art:
[
No, but I think we may have found the 'missing link'...hung said:Does this qualify as Cock Art:
[
mingnut said:LOL :tongue: - Too right it is!! Priceless, weirdly shaped and delicate taken with an antique camera. I'm really going to have to step it up and get professional if i start a website. Gonna need hair and make-up, mirkins and a stylist
windtalkerways said:Mirkins...hilarious!!!
mingnut said:Mirkins are not funny, they are deadly serious for the sufferers of nobapecia and i for one applaud the efforts that quality mirkin manufacturers make for this much under-valued minority. Shame on you all!
http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~ethorb/mirkins.html
http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~ethorb/mirkins2.html
http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~ethorb/mirkincare.html
alex8 said:Exhibition at a small backstreet gallery, maybe just a block or two from your favorite local take-out eatery:
Cock and Balls (2002) by Patrick Williams.
Matador (2004) and Fish Boy (2005) by NakedTony.
The Lingerie Cock (2004) by Boris Shpeizman.
United We Stand (2004) and Cock Fight (1999) by ZooAss.
mingnut said:real cock art (in my eyes) needs the cock to be involved.
windtalkerways said:So, is your art from the
Ming Dynasty?
alex8 said:Here's some stuff by US photographer Chris Hroncich, the titles are as per the file names :wink: ---
rawbone8 said:no, but possibly the Hung, Dong or Wang Dynasty