warmhorizon
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Posts
- 129
- Media
- 9
- Likes
- 55
- Points
- 248
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Oookay, I can see we're getting nowhere so I'm going to break down you last message into smaller parts and deal with them individually.
Think on that a little. :smile:
Correct. In fact nobody to this point has disputed your claim that SOME people may not get aroused but that's not what you originally said is it? You originally said, and I quote, again verbatim:This is different though. I was half right. Some people react in different ways. Some people may get wet or get erections and some may not.
The issue I and I think most of the other people here had a problem with is that you didn't, at any point in that sentence, say SOME. Basically, even if you didn't mean it that way you said, in no uncertain terms, "Men can't get raped because they are aroused and therefore want it". You see what you did there? I'm not twisting your words, I'm just taking them AT FACE VALUE. Subtly different but important nonetheless.I think if the guy is hard then it isn't really rape because that would mean he is consenting
Where, may I ask, did you get this information? If I were to hazard a guess and, please tell me if I'm wrong because I genuinely want to know this font of knowledge you are referencing, I would think one of your roommates or dormmates or whatever you call them in American colleges told you a story about how some girl tried to get all up in that but he didn't want it and told you about it, probably over some "ganja" or marijuana like your namesake implies. Did it not occur to you that there was even the inkling of chance that he was not every single person on the planet? No? Oh don't worry, that's the drugs, they do weird things to your brain I hear. Make you hear things that aren't actually there and hallucinate fantastic tv shows where men are on screen giving two thumbs up to being drug-raped by a woman with STDs on spring break.But from the information I had been given, people never did respond the way you have said they do.
It's actually pretty hard to answer this bit because I'm stifling uncontrollable laughter. I see I see it's the MEDIA's fault now is it? Blaming the people reading the post, the "crowd" if you want to refer to my earlier Zen master speech, didn't quite pan out and get the majority on your side so you latch on to the nearest thing that comes to mind. It's a shame that the "tv show" (again, see "drug related hallucinations above") was incorrect and couldn't be firmly rooted in reality like all those other shows on tv like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Heroes. Shame really, they should really warn people when they're going to break away from real pressing issues, such as undead hordes and genocidal mutants, that they don't mention when tv begins being.. oh whats that word.. ah yes, FICTIONAL!I think in this case it is more the medias fault for not portraying it in this way.
Actually yes you could. By using this wonderful new-fangled contraption the INTERNET you could have, oh I don't know, CHECKED. Just a wacky idea but, you know, I'm not running on "the ganja". Poor me, I have all my brain cells intact! Whatever will I do with this living hell my fully functioning mind is submitting me to? And the fact that you jumped in with second hand knowledge with absolutely nothing to back it up, well, nothing that actually exists in, you know, real life, is actually total genius. You know, i once heard that a woman fell off a cliff when on her period. My God! We have to warn ALL women around the world that during their periods they'll feel compelled to become human lemmings! A million pound operation must be put into effect to fence off ALL cliff-tops to prevent this hideous thing that clearly happens to ALL women from happening again!I can't help it if that is all I knew about the subject all I needed was to be informed about it.
Again correct but, you see, nobody actually DID say that now did they? Dolfette commented on how your information was incorrect and that you shouldn't say things that you do not understand and so did many other offended posters. However at no point (to my recollection, I've been writing this for a while) did anybody say or directly imply that you "belittle rape victims". The fact that you reached that conclusion on your own implies that maybe you realise that you have made a mistake and that dispite the many many hints that maybe, just maybe, you have made a mistake and should do a little bit more research, in a rather roundabout way I will admit, you contine to insist that you are right despite the fact that we are, figuratively speaking, RIPPING YOU TO SHREDS!I didn't need someone telling me I am trying to belittle rape victims though.
Think on that a little. :smile: